Pride Of Detroit: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Tobias Harris signs with Tennessee

Time to Get Back to Business

Although the seventh week of the NFL season isn't technically complete just yet, I'm ready to start looking ahead to the Rams game on November 1 and the rest of the season in general.  The bye week was a nice break for both the team and fans, because everyone really needed a week off.  The team needed it to rest up and get healthy, and for me, at least, it was nice to just relax on a Sunday for a change, though I'm anxious for the Lions to get back on the field.

As we look ahead to the second part of the season, the schedule doesn't exactly get any easier.  Before the season it looked like that would be the case, and although the Rams present one of the most winnable games on the schedule, it's not going to be all that easy after Sunday.  Here is a full look at the rest of the schedule:

vs. St. Louis Rams
at Seattle Seahawks
at Minnesota Vikings
vs. Cleveland Browns
vs. Green Bay Packers
at Cincinnati Bengals
at Baltimore Ravens
vs. Arizona Cardinals
at San Francisco 49ers
vs. Chicago Bears

I break down the final ten weeks of the season into five different parts.  The first part is the Rams game on Sunday, which, like I said, is one of the most winnable games on the schedule.  I won't have as much faith in the Lions winning if Matthew Stafford and Calvin Johnson don't play, but the Rams are not very good.  That is a game the Lions should and have to win.

Star-divide

Moving on to the next little section of the schedule, the Lions have two tough road games.  The Seahawks have been a very inconsistent team this season, showing they can be beat.  I would give the Lions a legitimate shot at Ford Field, but Qwest Field is one of the toughest places to play in the entire league.  The same can be said for the Metrodome.  The Vikings already beat the Lions in Detroit, and despite their loss to Pittsburgh, they are playing solid football right now.  Of course, the Lions did have a halftime lead against the Vikings before falling apart in the third and fourth quarters, so an upset isn't exactly out of the question.

The next part of the schedule is a pair of home games that occur basically within days of each other.  The first is against the Browns, which is also one of the most winnable games on the schedule.  The Browns have at least won a game, but they are on the same level as the Rams as far as I'm concerned.  The Packers, on the other hand, are a very good team, as we found out last week.  Playing them on Thanksgiving should be fun, and I think anything could happen in this game.  The Packers will obviously be favored, but an upset would not surprise me.

The fourth part of the schedule is two tough road games against AFC North teams.  The first is at Cincinnati, which is certainly looking much tougher than I ever expected it to be.  The Bengals are a good team, and they showed that yesterday by absolutely destroying the Bears.  The other road game in this section of the schedule is against the Ravens.  They have struggled a bit lately, but playing at Baltimore won't be an easy task by any means.

The final part of the schedule is a pair of games against NFC West teams and the season finale against the Bears.  The Cardinals come to Ford Field on December 20, and although I originally thought an upset was possible in this game, I'm not so sure after watching Arizona go into Giants Stadium and leave with a victory.  They seem to be getting things going again, and while December 20 is a long time from now, that appears to be the toughest home game left on the schedule.  Next up for the Lions is a game at the 49ers.  They appear to be a much better team than most anticipated, and who knows what kind of team they will be by the end of the year.  Alex Smith is now their starting quarterback, and if he suddenly turns his career around, they could be a team that makes some noise, especially with Michael Crabtree finally playing.  The final game of the season is against the Bears at home.  The Lions showed that they can beat Chicago earlier this month, though it was only for one half.  A four-quarter effort at home against the Bears that includes no special teams mistakes could mean the season ends on a positive note.

So, what does all of this mean?  Well, after looking at each game, I came to the conclusion that the realistic best-case scenario for the rest of the season is a 5-5 finish.  For that to happen, the Lions would have to win the games they should (Rams, Browns), pull off a couple upsets at home, and steal a game on the road.  I think it is asking too much for a couple upsets on the road to happen or the Lions to finish with a perfect home record from here on out, so I settled on 5-5 as the best-case scenario.  The worst-case scenario, on the other hand, is a 1-9 finish.  For that to happen, this recent injury bug would have to stick around for the rest of the season, and outside of one win in either the Rams or Browns games, things would go poorly in every other matchup.

To come to a happy medium in between the best- and worst-case scenarios, I think a 3-7 finish is the most likely scenario for the rest of the season.  In this scenario the Lions would beat St. Louis and Cleveland and then pull off an upset in one of the other home games.  I'd like to realistically predict that the Lions will win a road game this season, but none of them look all that winnable.  The Lions' best shot at a road win will probably be at San Francisco, but the 49ers could be battling for a playoff spot by the time this game happens, so that would make it even tougher.

The above-described most likely scenario for the rest of the season assumes that Matthew Stafford and Calvin Johnson return to the starting lineup soon and don't suffer any more injuries, and that this team in general gets healthier than it has been so far this season.  If injuries continue to pile up, then I could see the worst-case scenario happening, but if this team can stay healthy for the most part, it has a shot at finishing 6-10, which is what I actually predicted before the season.

More than anything, the one thing I hope to see the rest of the season is continued improvement on both sides of the ball and special teams.  If the Lions could put together a solid finish with noticeable improvement, that would be great momentum heading into 2010 and beyond. 

What do you guys think?

0 recs  |  Comment 53 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I'm just looking forward to the day when 4-12 is not considered a good season.

However, after last year and the way the team was run for 8 years, I would be happy with a 4-12 finish.

I root for the Tigers, Pistons, Red Wings and yes, the Lions.
www.twitter.com/zajareich

by ReichardZ on Oct 26, 2009 4:57 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

5-5 is too much to ask

the only two real winnable games are the browns and rams games. They are coming off a bye, so they should easily win against the Rams, and I think they are gonna take care of business the Browns in town.

At max, I can see them winning one more game other than those two. Most likely, the Seattle game. Last year, we got destroyed by the 49ers with JT Osulivan at QB, and no wideouts. I think the score is going to be closer this year, but they are still gonna lose. San Fran is a solid football team, and they should have Crabtree and Alex Smith fully into the offense by the time the Lions face them.

I say they go 3-13 this season, and end up with the 4th pick in the draft

The beginning of the end of the misery

by latif on Oct 26, 2009 5:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

That's why 5-5 is the best-case scenario

Everything has to go right for it to happen.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Oct 26, 2009 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I spray paint my dog Honolulu Blue and Silver

Pic - me and the great Herman Moore

by NYCLionsfan on Oct 27, 2009 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It really comes down to injuries at this point. I am really curious how Stafford and Johnson are feeling. Can be we cut Dullpepper yet?

by Beerhero on Oct 26, 2009 5:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Beerhero said it best

it all comes down to who we have on the field… without stafford and megatron we can probably beat the rams and browns but that’s it. If they can get back on the field I think the lions win 4 of the last 10, rams, browns, seahawks and a packers upset on thanksgiving… if we don’t beat the rams and browns we’re staring at another top 3 pick and our salary cap will be even more fucked…

by stumpy8100 on Oct 26, 2009 5:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

More than anything I hope we put together a good finish so our pick isn’t too high.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Oct 26, 2009 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

as much as i hate to say it i want a top 5 pick we need a LT so bad

the dudes name is sliping my mind at the moment but most mocks have him going in top 5 and have us picking at 8 or so

but back to topic at heand

vs. St. Louis Rams =w
at Seattle Seahawks = coin flip
at Minnesota Vikings = L
vs. Cleveland Browns = w
vs. Green Bay Packers = coin flip
at Cincinnati Bengals =L
at Baltimore Ravens =L
vs. Arizona Cardinals =L
at San Francisco 49ers = coin flip
vs. Chicago Bears = coin flip

Just Remember matt... what would Daunte do??

by det32 on Oct 26, 2009 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like the optimism

but there is no way the Lions are beating the 49ers or Packers…maybe the Bears after seeing them get crushed by the Bengals but after the 26-0 loss at GB…hope they lose to get a top 5 draft pick for next year – need a LT to protect $71 million dollar investment.

by LionsfaninCT on Oct 26, 2009 7:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Russell Okung of Oklahoma State is the LT you are thinking of.

He is, right now, the consensus best LT in college.

Although a name that is starting to get a lot of play is Charles Brown from USC. Two other guys that sound really interesting are Bruce Campbell of Maryland and Anthony Davis of Rutgers. These three guys are pegged as Tackles with the athletic ability to play on the left side as opposed to guys who are really Right Tackles [ie. Trent Williams and Ciron Black].

by NorthLeft12 on Oct 26, 2009 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Charlie Brown moved from TE to LT

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/559356

Good thing he’s not a kicker.

What? He can’t block a dead gopher? Humph, details.

by GRLion on Oct 27, 2009 2:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't want a top 5 pick

They’re too expensive. Until the NFL gets a reasonable rookie salary scale, the benefits of a top-5 pick, given the statistical bust risk, just don’t justify the costs.

Maybe pick #5 would be okay, but I’d much rather be closer to #10. It’s easier to trade around from there, and there are plenty of immediate-impact guys you can get in the top-middle of the first round.

I might be in the minority here, but I don’t think we should be spending huge money and draft capital on a top-5 LT in 2010. We still have Backus because of his contract, and he’s not horrible (mediocre, sure, but not bad).

In the immediate term, I’d rather spend some mid-round picks on O-linemen who have a lot of upside, and work them into the rotation as they earn it, giving us immediate youth and depth. We should probably spend our top few picks rebuilding our defense—particularly the secondary, starting with a CB or two, and a DE or DT in there somewhere, wherever the value fits. But now I guess I’m talking about drafting position and not value again, silly me.

by n4ry4 on Oct 27, 2009 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I agree we need an upgrade at LT, but we’re handcuffed to Backus because of that contract. To get rid of him would create alot of dead cap money and the release of more players to get lesser, cheaper talent just to fill a 53-man roster. This is the only reason I don’t think the Lions will draft a LT in the first rd as it would tie up way too much $$$$ at 1 OL position. Thanks again for nothin’, Millen.
I think the Lions are going to emphasis defense with this upcoming draft which is supposed to be very deep with defensive talent. I would be happy with the BPA approach again, I just hope the BPA is defensive.

by JazzyBBP on Oct 27, 2009 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the BPA will be defensive

Something in the DT, DE or S stocks I expect.

2009 = The start of the Lions Golden Age (We hope).

by Hyperion Ecta on Oct 27, 2009 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nevermind about the cap issues in my comment

I forgot there is no cap in 2010. Draft Suh or Okung if they’re there

by JazzyBBP on Oct 27, 2009 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

has that benn confermerd??

if not what about this??

pick okung but have him play gard for a year help him learn the speed with not as much presher then move him to LT next year and cut sackus

donno if it would work out as well as it did in my head

Just Remember matt... what would Daunte do??

by det32 on Oct 27, 2009 11:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

or like rmatheny

said few post down put sacks at gard i donno i just want to upgrad are LT b/c if we do i think are off is set maybe a RB the fallowing year if smith hasnt broken out

Just Remember matt... what would Daunte do??

by det32 on Oct 28, 2009 12:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope to God that the

Thanksgiving game is competitive because I don’t want to risk losing our annual Thanksgiving game

by ImPuLsE on Oct 26, 2009 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't worry about it.

We’ve won as recently as ’03. Granted this year could be our 6th loss in a row, but we had a 5 year streak of losses in 1945-49 according to this website:

http://www.nfl.com/thanksgiving/story?id=09000d5d80437c09&template=with-video&confirm=true

It’s nfl.com and it says true at the end so it really is true right?

We’ll be fine.

by Lionsrmycrack on Oct 28, 2009 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rams, Seahawks, Browns

and MAYBE 9ers are the only games I see us winning

by ImPuLsE on Oct 26, 2009 6:12 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

What? He can’t block a dead gopher? Humph, details.

by GRLion on Oct 27, 2009 2:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

all in all

i think impulse is right, we might upset someone though. and i think we dominate the bears at home. when the smoke clears i think we end up with 4 to 5 wins. and still in the right direction, the lions show me improvement every game.

by timmy20 on Oct 26, 2009 6:17 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

And think about this

A team with 0 wins going to 4 or 5 wins is like a team with 8 wins going to 12 or 13 wins. Both instances would show signs of a team greatly improving

by ImPuLsE on Oct 26, 2009 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep

What? He can’t block a dead gopher? Humph, details.

by GRLion on Oct 27, 2009 2:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

All about the QBs

You just have to look at the opposing QB’s to find winnable games. Every decent to good QB just tears the defense apart. So the Rams, Browns and Niners are the only winnable games barring an injury to a starting QB somewhere else. I just hope we win enough not to have to pick first but lose enough to have Eric Berry still on the board. I really like the Rams and Browns games though, they could be in worse shape than us.

by Russ Aronson on Oct 26, 2009 6:54 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

And we will still

make their average to bad QB look like Joe Montana

by ATL Lion on Oct 27, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The back half does look much tougher than I realised

Realistically, I’d be pretty happy with an 5-11 finish. I’m thinking, Rams, Seahawks, Browns & the 49ers…but even that seems pretty unlikely. I think 3-13 is a pretty reasonable outlook.

2009 = The start of the Lions Golden Age (We hope).

by Hyperion Ecta on Oct 26, 2009 7:12 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree HE. 3 and 13 is realistic. Depressing, but realistic.

The silver lining is that we should get a choice between at least two of Okung, Berry, Suh, or McCoy. Depends who is in front of us on who we will be able to draft.

by NorthLeft12 on Oct 26, 2009 8:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We only play 3 teams with losing records in our last 10 games........

……….STL, SEA, CLE. We also play 3 teams that are currently 3-3…….BAL, CHI, SF, although I expect the Ravens and Bears to have winning records by the end of the season (maybe even the 49’ers, due to their weak division). I’m expecting to beat all 3 losing teams (even though beating the Seahawks on the road will be tough). That would make us 4-12, which matches my preseason prediction, with 2 of the wins also matching (STL, CLE). If Staff and Calvin are healthy though, we’re capable of stealing some wins vs. the Bears or Packers at home, or the 49’ers on the road. I hope we do. We might even surprise someone like BAL or ARI if they’re taking us for granted.

What? He can’t block a dead gopher? Humph, details.

by GRLion on Oct 27, 2009 2:56 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Outlook

It is sad, but I am just happy to not be the bottom of the barrel anymore. No one even talks about the Lions as one of the worst teams this season – I would like enough wins to continue that anonymity yet still end up with a decent pick in the draft. I am guessing 4-12 which should have us picking 4th to 6th.

I like us to win against the Rams and Browns – if we could beat Seattle that would be great, but I would rather see a win against the Bears in the last game of the season. I anticipate a loss on Thanksgiving, but please let us make it a game (both for entertainment value and to make sure we keep the game in Detroit). It I didn’t watch the Lions on Thanksgiving, it wouldn’t feel like Thanksgiving. I would rather not have turkey than the Lions . . .

by Lions-fan-SLC on Oct 26, 2009 7:48 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I was becoming more optimistic after Staff was announced as the starter but.....

these freaking injuries are dragging out what I hoped would be the part of this season where the young core of the team would get used to playing with each other. Funny, but it is mostly the veterans who are staying injury free [Foote, Peterson, Backus, Raiola] and the youngsters who are falling like flies.

by NorthLeft12 on Oct 26, 2009 8:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Backus never gets hurt

He’s a machine. Jeff Backus is the Robot of Mediocrity.

What? He can’t block a dead gopher? Humph, details.

by GRLion on Oct 27, 2009 3:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Backus

He may move to LG if we decide to take a LT in the draft. I honestly hate Backus, not because he’s terrible, in all honesty he’s average, but it’s because he was such a high pick and is paid so much that he’s not really worth all the hassle.

by rmatheny on Oct 27, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

schedule

i think if the lions are healthy they will finsih 4-12 and considering last season that would be a success. As long as stafford progresses and dosent pull a jamracus russel and looks bad then things should be fine. if they get a top 5 pick and get okung they can start with maybe 6 wins then move their way up.

by David7 on Oct 26, 2009 8:07 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Hate to be Johnny Raincloud...

… unless we start looking only one game at a time, and preparing for one game at a time, we could go 1 & 15 for the season. I hope our guys are hungry and come back with an attitude. Lamp chops with apple sauce would be very tasty…

by Keevatron on Oct 26, 2009 8:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Fortunately some of our most winnable games are coming right up

STL next, followed by SEA, then CLE 2 weeks later.

What? He can’t block a dead gopher? Humph, details.

by GRLion on Oct 27, 2009 3:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

They Will Beat Stil and Cle

……thats 3 and they will one that they arent suposed too for 4 wins…..My guess is against the Bears at home. 4 – 12 and 5th pick in draft……Trade down and pick up another 2nd and 4th rounder…..Keep adding picks and players

by BennieBladesFan on Oct 26, 2009 9:17 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

That's a good idea

in theory, but those first five picks get so much guaranteed money that they’re hard to trade away. Our best hope is that a QB is hyped up and a team has a strong need of him, much like the Browns-Jets Scenario for Sanchez. Just a note as well, looks like that trade really burned Cleveland, as bad as their QB’s are they should have taken Sanchez.

by rmatheny on Oct 27, 2009 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Cleveland made the right move at the time

They couldn’t have known back then that both their QB’s would suck it up this year. Quinn was a recent first-round pick, and Anderson had just had a great season one year prior. It wouldn’t make sense for them to draft a QB at #5 overall unless they knew they would immediately need one.

Plus, their trade with NYJ netted them an additional mid-2nd round pick and a bunch of players that the coach wanted.

It may not work out with them in the long run, but I’m always a fan the idea of moving down, acquiring extra picks, and filling the roster with more quality players.

by n4ry4 on Oct 28, 2009 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I Wish.....

i could be half as optimistic as you guys. we barley beat Was, a team that hasnt scored more than 17 pts in a game this year. apart from that game and the pit game (still trying to figure THAT one out) there hasnt really been another close game. 3 would be about as good as it gets, but i wouldnt be surprised with only 1 or 2. there might be a slight opportunity if ARZ starts coasting early like they did last year, but i highly doubt it.

as for picks, yeah, i wouldnt mind some of the highly rated OTs, but im much more concerned about the D. im looking at DT Suh. and whens the last time we drafted a respectable CB? Andre Goodman? pffff.

by haywood on Oct 26, 2009 11:52 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't think more than 3 wins is out of the question

We already have one win.
STL is terrible, and we’re playing them at home, after a bye week.
CLE is terrible, and we’re playing them at home.

That’s 3. All we need is one other victory in eight games to get to 4. Hell, I wouldn’t rule out two victories if Stafford and CJ can get healthy.

by n4ry4 on Oct 28, 2009 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stafford

seems to likely be out for the Rams game according to Mortensen at ESPN, citing that he is more “week to week” than “day to day” however if we do see Staff suit up against StL I wouldn’t be surprised. ESPN has gotten things wrong many-a-time in the past.

by rmatheny on Oct 27, 2009 5:34 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

EVERY game is a potential LOSS if Staff and CJ are out

Let’s face it – our Lions need to play perfect just to beat the Rams and Browns and that’s with Staff and CJ in the line-up, without them I think we may be the worst team in the league, or one of the worst anyway.

I’m thinking 2-14 at this point honestly with the injuries we have.

I spray paint my dog Honolulu Blue and Silver

Pic - me and the great Herman Moore

by NYCLionsfan on Oct 27, 2009 9:25 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Backus

I think there are going to be a lot of disappointed fans next April. I would be willing to bet all the money I have they will not take a LT with the first pick. Whether you like it or not, Backus is here til his contract is up which is case you were wondering…is 2012.

That being said, if Stafford and CJ don’t play they could very well go winless the rest of the year. If they play. St Louis, Cleveland, Green Bay and Chicago at home IMO. Yes the Green Bay game was ugly last week, but if we had any semblance of an offense the game would have been much closer.

by severs28 on Oct 27, 2009 9:46 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Bah

If he underperforms and they have a chance to take a new face thats better, they will pay him to be a backup until 12.

by ATL Lion on Oct 27, 2009 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

SJ

game against rams is a coin flip. stephen jackson might run all over us. if calvin isn’t healthy and cant go, doesn’t matter if stafford plays!

by jeremy j on Oct 27, 2009 3:09 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

CAREFUL

that is blasphemy in the Church of the Sacred Staff!

by rbanner on Oct 27, 2009 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good post Sean

But I think I’ll keep my opinion to myself on this one.

by KDawg on Oct 27, 2009 3:45 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Welcome to Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's blog that is your source for everything Detroit Lions.
Start posting about the Lions »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

66_small
Lions put Stephen Peterman on IR, sign WR Eric Fowler
Small
More Bad News
Detroit-lions_small
On Paper: Lions vs. Browns
Bubblesadjustment_small
Hearts out to Chris Spielman
Small
What if... ?
Awesome_small
This Should Cheer You Guys Up
Clip_small
Thinking Bout the Good Ole Days
Lion_small
BLACKOUT
D_smother_small
Draft Dream or Nightmare?
Cwood_small
intresting article by K. Seifert

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Gang Green Nation
How to Beat the Cheats-- Sunday Preview
Mobile Live
Garrett Wolfe Out For the Year (Updated)
Mobile Live
Friday Notes: Lions Place Stephen Peterman on IR, Sign Eric Fowler

Managing Editor

Pod_small Sean Yuille

Writer

New-lions-logo_1__small DrewsLions