Stafford's performance in his first six games nearly MIRRORS Peyton Manning's
(Note from Sean: Bumped to the front page for the interesting comparison and good research.)
Matthew Stafford had a really bad game yesterday. Still, if you want a pick-me-up from some historical perspective, his overall performance through six games is very, very similar to that of another #1-overall rookie eleven years ago who turned out to be pretty good:
Peyton Manning, rookie year, first 6 games:
Game 1: 1 TD, 3 INT, 8.16 ypa, 56.8% comp
Game 2: 1 TD, 3 INT, 5.70 ypa, 63.6% comp
Game 3: 0 TD, 2 INT, 4.39 ypa, 45.5% comp
Game 4: 1 TD, 3 INT, 9.66 ypa, 59.4% comp
Game 5: 1 TD, 1 INT, 5.96 ypa, 52.2% comp
Game 6: 2 TD, 2 INT, 5.73 ypa, 48.8% comp
Total:
6 TD, 14 INT = .428 TD/INT ratio
113 comp / 210 att = 53.8% comp
1364 yards / 210 att = 6.50 ypa
--
Matthew Stafford, rookie year, first 6 games:
Game 1: 0 TD, 3 INT, 5.54 ypa, 43.2% comp
Game 2: 1 TD, 2 INT, 5.07 ypa, 60.0% comp
Game 3: 1 TD, 0 INT, 6.69 ypa, 58.3% comp
Game 4: 1 TD, 1 INT, 8.22 ypa, 66.7% comp
Game 5: 0 TD, 1 INT, 5.09 ypa, 42.4% comp
Game 6: 2 TD, 5 INT, 5.23 ypa, 52.4% comp
Total:
5 TD, 12 INT = .417 TD/INT ratio
115 comp / 214 att = 53.7% comp
1265 yards / 214 att = 5.91 ypa
Side-by-Side Comparison:
6 TD, 14 INT = .428 TD/INT ratio (Manning)
5 TD, 12 INT = .417 TD/INT ratio (Stafford)
113 comp / 210 att = 53.8% comp (Manning)
115 comp / 214 att = 53.7% comp (Stafford)
1364 yards / 210 att = 6.50 ypa (Manning)
1265 yards / 214 att = 5.91 ypa (Stafford)
TD-INT ratio:
Manning threw one more TD and two more INT's than Stafford.
Manning's TD-INT ratio beats Stafford's by eleven hundredths of one percent (that's not very much).
Completion %
Manning completed 113 of 210 passes.
Stafford completed 115 of 214 passes.
Manning's completion % beats Stafford's by one tenth of one percent.
Yards per Attempt:
Manning's 6.5 ypa beats Stafford's 5.91 by 1 foot, 9-1/2 inches.
Side note:
Stafford has had to play one game of his first six without Calvin Johnson. Marvin Harrison did not miss any of Peyton Manning's first six games.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Pride of Detroit's main writer, Sean, or the site in general. FanPosts are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable fans.
1 recs |
108 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
Huh
Maybe he’s doing it on purpose? hehe jk
by supupeoples on Nov 9, 2009 9:49 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Normally this kind of thing would give me hope
but these are the Lions and I will hold judgement until furtehr evidence of progression comes in (ie: another season under center). One thing in our favor is Matt Millen is gone so drafting should be much better in 2010 and beyond!!!
Good numbers you put together N4ry4.
I spray paint my dog Honolulu Blue and Silver
Pic - me and the great Herman Moore
by NYCLionsfan on Nov 9, 2009 9:56 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
The Colts' records leading up to Manning's rookie year
91 – 1-15
92 – 9-7
93 – 4-12
94 – 8-8
95 – 9-7
96 – 9-7
97 – 3-13
So you could make the argument that Manning was coming to a much better team and still didn’t do well.
by LionFaninCA on Nov 9, 2009 10:28 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Those old Indy teams
Plus, as crazy as that sounds those few good years they had before Peyton Manning were not so much a great team as, Jim Harbuagh had some sort of freaking magic in that span that still baffles me, I got an old Harbaugh colts jersey and a poster on my wall to this day. Why we cut him for Ty “Interception” Detmer is beyond me.
by Beerhero on Nov 9, 2009 2:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
add into those era's the following now successful franchises or franchises that have lived success recently
new england…remember those days?
l.a. rams…although they are right back there…
n.y. jets
san diego
arizona
by londonlion on Nov 10, 2009 1:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Shows that patience is a virtue
And that the TEAM AROUND Stafford needs to get better too. People also like to forget that he is the 2nd youngest QB EVER to start in the NFL.
GO LIONS! RESTORE THE ROAR!
by Twon82 on Nov 9, 2009 10:28 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
+1
Is that true?? 2nd youngest to ever start an NFL game>> >>> didn’t know that Twon.
I spray paint my dog Honolulu Blue and Silver
Pic - me and the great Herman Moore
by NYCLionsfan on Nov 9, 2009 10:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Love the comparison...but...
…the most telling numbers are the 6 games played by each. For those of you ready to crown Matt Stafford the next Peytong Manning, or at the other end of the extreme spectrum, Joey Harrington, I think it’s only fair to remember that it has only been six games.
As unfair as it is to say that Stafford is a bust because he threw 5INT yesterday, it’s just as unfair to say that he’s going to be as good as Peyton. I understand the purpose of the post was to point out that even someone as great as Peyton struggled initially. I guess I’m just hoping at some point the comparisons will go away. It is nearly impossible to compare a team that finished an 0-16 season with anyone, as this may be something that is never accomplished again.
by Mushy on Nov 9, 2009 10:32 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
+1 Mushy
Its all projections and hearsay. What we need are more data points until we can draw any conclusions about Staff.
In the meantime the debating is quite fun……………I really hope Staff turns out to be a great QB and one that leads us to great places. The jury is still out, obviously and we need to be patient, which unfortunately there’s not a lot of in today’s NFL.
I spray paint my dog Honolulu Blue and Silver
Pic - me and the great Herman Moore
by NYCLionsfan on Nov 9, 2009 10:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Very good point, Mushy
I don’t think the argument can sway in either direction too far. I think the theme here should be “don’t get too discouraged”. No fate has been sealed yet. Stafford has the same promise he held as the first overall pick. We just now know that this team is still very, very bad and he will struggle with so little help.
by DrewsLions on Nov 9, 2009 2:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well said
We, as fans, often expect to much to quick. We also make rash judgements.
2009 = The start of the Lions Golden Age (We hope).
Zack Follett: he will hurt your mind.
by Hyperion Ecta on Nov 9, 2009 8:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
thanks
for some positive info.. I did not know where to go with the feelings I have this morning… darn… that’s a few winnable games we could have had…
GO LIONS 2009! the transformation begins.
by DINORDO on Nov 9, 2009 10:33 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thank You For Posting This....
……Ive mentioned this a few times in some other peoples posts……It takes time
by BennieBladesFan on Nov 9, 2009 10:38 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
One other thing.
I haven’t seen any comments on this, so maybe I am remembering this wrong. On that last drive Stafford threw a jump ball up to CJ on the sideline that Johnson got both hands on…but failed to come down with the ball. Just wondering if anyone else noticed that. It’s a little disheartening when the guy you NEED to play well is also coming up short when given an opportunity to help his young QB and help his team.
by Mushy on Nov 9, 2009 10:52 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I noticed that too
I wanted to see a replay, but I don’t think they showed one. Did it look easily catchable, like a more difficult catch to make?
by n4ry4 on Nov 9, 2009 10:54 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Gotta love DVR.
I watched it several times. It would have been a good, maybe even a tough, catch for other receivers on the team…but I was pretty shocked that Calvin didn’t haul it in. He easily had one full hand on it, and the majority of his other hand. I’m sure it sounds like I’m nitpicking…but if I’m going to roast Stafford for the throws that were off the mark, I’ve gotta get after our supposedly Pro-Bowl receiver missing catches in key situations.
by Mushy on Nov 9, 2009 11:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
there was also the long pass where he planted his heels out-of-bounds. I know coverage was tight, but he managed to catch it, he just didn’t have his feet in the right spot.
by n4ry4 on Nov 9, 2009 11:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
he had already stepped out of bounds...
can’t step out of bounds & be the first player to touch the ball…that was due to the coverage. solid throw though.
by londonlion on Nov 9, 2009 12:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh yeah.
I had almost forgotten about that too. Look, I love CJ and I’m hoping that at some point people will be talking about Stafford to Johnson like we talk about Peyton to Marvin….but Calvin has to step up his game too!
by Mushy on Nov 9, 2009 1:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Montana to Rice
Sounds like a few more rings to it.
by lionsfan64 on Nov 9, 2009 11:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Who Else.......
I am also willing to bet Ryan Leaf’s numbers were about there also…….If Stafford gets a decent running game and o-line, then I feel we can evaluate him………
by douglazz63 on Nov 9, 2009 10:57 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
No, Leaf was way worse
44% comp
5.5 ypa
1 TD / 12 INT
through his first 6 games
by n4ry4 on Nov 9, 2009 11:05 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Just for funsies...
…how did Joey look?
by Mushy on Nov 9, 2009 11:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
better, actually
83 / 158 for 1009 yards, 5td, 6 int
52.5% comp (just over 1% less than Stafford & Manning)
6.3 ypa (better than Stafford, not as good as Manning)
.83 TD-INT ratio (way better than both)
If you want to see any others, go to www.profootballreference.com, Search for the player, and click the “Game Log” link to see individual game stats
by n4ry4 on Nov 9, 2009 11:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That's a great site
Lots of historical stats on teams and players. I discovered it a few weeks ago while Googling and have since linked it many times in comments here.
What? He can’t block a dead gopher? Humph, details.
by GRLion on Nov 9, 2009 12:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
SO STAFFORD IS GONNA BE WORSE THAN JOEY!!!
OH NO!!!
by Mushy on Nov 9, 2009 1:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
OUTSTANDING work
Very nicely done! Obviously, just because Einstein got bad grades as a kid doesn’t mean everyone with bad grades is Einstein—but to everyone who’s ready to throw in the towel on Stafford, know that it’s impossible to evaluate a quarterback based solely on his first few games as a pro. If he’s not markedly better next season . . . THEN you can start to worry.
Peace
Ty
http://thelionsinwinter.blogspot.com
by ty@thelionsinwinter on Nov 9, 2009 11:32 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Good number breakdown
Really liked the stat comparison. Nice job and keeps me hopeful.
Some things I saw not shown from the numbers is the types of passes and reads Stafford has been able to make. His first couple of games, all he was doing was throwing lasers. But this game, he threw a few nicely arcing balls that were right on the mark. That Bryant Johnson TD was amazing. And the Calvin out of bounds catch also was nicely thrown. It’s promising to see him make the read that coverage is one on one and then attack the CB by making a nice throw where the WR can make the play.
Another thing I saw came from the Pettigrew TD catch. He threw it high and in front of the TE. The ball could only be caught by a leaping Pettigrew. He utilized Pettigrew’s strengths: height, leaping, and position. That way, if he missed, the ball would go incomplete, which is a safe play in the redzone. So I really thought that was a nice play call, read, and execution.
He did seem to get a bit too excited after easily moving down the field and scoring in the first quarter. Then, when pushing the ball, he reverted to more laser throws, which created the INTs. Once he settles down and learns to pick apart the subtle ways defenses make adjustments, rather than panic or get overly aggressive, he’ll be a fun guy to watch Sunday’s. Heck I can’t wait until we see him on Monday Night for that matter.
by UniBallOut on Nov 9, 2009 11:55 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
joeys numbers for the first 6games he started not total games he played
remember joey harrington came off the bench the first 2 games but here is his numbers for the first 6 games:
110comp-215att 1260yards 6td 8int 51.2comp% 5.86ypa 3wins 3losses
by PINOPUNCH79 on Nov 9, 2009 12:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
i meant....
the first six games joey started
by PINOPUNCH79 on Nov 9, 2009 12:11 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
The TD to Bryant Johnson was a big deal..
That was a throw less than half the QBs in the NFL make with any consistancy…honestly
http://cmufootball.blogspot.com/
by CapitolLions on Nov 9, 2009 12:26 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
P Man
showed a nice progression, as the numbers indicate. Staff has shown regression, as his numbers indicate.
P Man had 2 300+ games, Joey Jr.=0.
Harrison never had a 1000 yd season or 100+ catches until the following year.
In fact, P Man had 0 receivers with over 60 catches, 2 with 50 or more, realied heavily on passes to the RB, who led the team with 86 receptions.
by rbanner on Nov 9, 2009 1:09 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Weird receiving stats so far this year
Here are the stats for our top 4 pass-catchers through 8 games. Can you name them?
No fair peeking at stat sites!
Player A 26 catches, 207 yds, 0 TD
Player B 24 catches, 352 yds, 1 TD
Player C 21 catches, 239 yds, 1 TD
Player D 20 catches, 276 yds, 2 TD
The most interesting thing about those stats is how closely bunched they are. No dominant receiver (might have something to do with somebody being double/triple-teamed on seemingly every play). Even a surprise in there, too. Make of these stats what you will.
What? He can’t block a dead gopher? Humph, details.
by GRLion on Nov 9, 2009 1:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
and injuries
calvin is player b
bryant is player d
ksmoothe is player a
dennis is player c
by londonlion on Nov 9, 2009 1:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You got 3 of 4 correct!
The surprise is Player C…….it’s Brandon Pettigrew.
(slot WR Dennis Northcutt has 17 catches, 161 yds, 1 TD)
TE Casey Fitzsimmons also has 12 catches, 81 yds, 0 TD
TE Will Heller has 10 catches, 141 yds, 1 TD
What we see is what some of us suspected might happen based on Offensive Coordinator Scott Linehan’s past experience…….heavy use of the TE position in the passing game (and the running game). Lions TE’s have 42 catches. Lions WR’s have 65 catches. Lions RB’s have 46 catches.
What? He can’t block a dead gopher? Humph, details.
by GRLion on Nov 9, 2009 1:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
This also shows hopefully some development by Pettigrew
Remember, he missed a couple weeks of camp. Grew’s still catching up. He seems to be getting it more lately. Also, he’s getting more plays with Stafford now, and the repetition helps them develop a rapport, especially if that repetition is in games.
In all, that’s a pretty healthy ratio of RB and TE catches. Part of that is WR drops; part of it is CJ being covered like a blanket. Part of it is check-downs by a rookie QB. Part of it is bad OL blocking, which makes those check-downs necessary. Part of it is Linehan’s play-calling, including the heavier use of screen passes this year, and more passes to the TE’s.
I’m happy with the TE’s and happy with ’Grew’s development so far.
The other important thing that I see is a path to improving the pass-catching corps. To some, this solution will be obvious, but let me spell it out.
Linehan’s pass offense emphasizes the WR1, WR2, RB, and TE as the main 4 pass-catchers (by comparison, in 2006 Mike Martz spread catches evenly between Roy Williams, Mike Furrey, and Kevin Jones until Jones got hurt). He will also change formations and mix in one of the following as a 5th eligible receiver: a 2nd TE, a FB, or a slot receiver(WR3). These guys are the spices, but the main staples of the offense are the wideouts, the RB, and the #1 TE.
What that means is while it’s nice to have depth and complementary pieces, guys like Dennis Northcutt, Derrick Williams, even Jerome Felton, are not the heart of the passing game. That may be obvious. These guys also have other roles, such as running/blocking/special teams. The heart of the receiving corps is CJ, BJ, ‘Grew, and K-Smooth. If you want to significantly upgrade our pass-catchers, IMO, that’s where you have to do it. Tinkering around the edges won’t get it done.
Which brings us to Bryant Johnson. Either he’s good enough, or he’s not. Calvin Johnson is……..well, Megatron. Kevin Smith is a fine pass-catcher. Brandon Pettigrew is making up lost ground and doing fine for a rookie. I like his long-term potential. No complaints. Bryant Johnson, meanwhile, is no rookie, but he’s been inconsistent this year. He had a great TD catch against Seattle, a week after he dropped 147 balls (or so it seemed) vs. STL. For his career, his stats have been fairly average. He’s got some size and speed, but is he a playmaker? Is he a true #2 posession WR? Can he be reliable? Is he good enough?
It may be obvious, but IMO the question of the pass-catching corps begins and ends with Bryant Johnson.
(yes, Staff is Staff, but he’ll be Staff next year too…..and Staff will still be here. Can BJ succeed with him?)
What? He can’t block a dead gopher? Humph, details.
by GRLion on Nov 9, 2009 2:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
i'm real happy to see grew's growth
i think if we get 600+ & 5 tds from bryant i will be happy…especially with some strong contributions from grew … but cj being on pace for only 700 & two tds worries me. he needs to break out. andre johnson, reggie wayne, randy moss, they all get extra attention. i know he has missed basically three games…but…he needs to break out in the second half.
by londonlion on Nov 9, 2009 2:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
We need the other 3 main pass-catchers to take the heat off Megatron. K-Smooth, ‘Grew, and whoever we put at WR2 ALL have to be credible threats, in order to lessen the coverage on Calvin. In the final analysis, that may be the big question with Bryant Johnson. Is he good enough threat to make plays that teams can’t just ignore him and load up on Calvin?
What? He can’t block a dead gopher? Humph, details.
by GRLion on Nov 9, 2009 2:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
what about...
williams? he and stafford clicked during the preseason, he made some pretty badass catches down the left sideline, he has wheels, what about giviht?ng him a shot at WR2? I mean the guy was a world wrecker at penn state, I say let him have a chance.
"If your not with us...
you're with the terrorists!!"
by alpha lion on Nov 11, 2009 9:59 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Derrick Williams was not the best receiver at Penn State......
He was the best kick returner…..and was very explosive in that role. However, as a WR at Penn State, Williams was out played and outdone by Deon Butler, who was Penn State’s WR1 the entire time that Derrick Williams played there.
by KDawg on Nov 12, 2009 2:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
When Williams was drafted
the Lions said it was a special teams pick.
by rbanner on Nov 12, 2009 3:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
but as alpha said
he perhaps clicked the best w/ staff during the preseason…they seemed on the same page almost 100% of the time…williams went after the ball too didn’t wait for it to come to him which i love in a wr
by londonlion on Nov 12, 2009 7:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Has Williams got the size and strength to be a #2 possession receiver complement to Calvin?
His size, strength, speed, agility, and skill set seem more like a typical slot receiver.
What? He can’t block a dead gopher? Humph, details.
by GRLion on Nov 12, 2009 8:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Grew really impressed me against Seattle
It’s good to see him progressing nicely.
2009 = The start of the Lions Golden Age (We hope).
Zack Follett: he will hurt your mind.
by Hyperion Ecta on Nov 9, 2009 8:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I knew he would improve, even when people were starting to doubt him
He missed camp time, and therefore started slow. Seen it happen before. But he had talent, and I had faith.
What? He can’t block a dead gopher? Humph, details.
by GRLion on Nov 10, 2009 2:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Common Formations in Linehan's offense
I-Normal (WR1, WR2, TE1, RB, FB)
I-Big (WR1, TE1, TE2, RB, FB) (sometimes used for Max Protect)
Singleback-Normal (WR1, WR2, WR3, TE1, RB)
Singleback-Big (WR1, WR2, TE1, TE2, RB) (often used for Max Protect)
Note the prevalence of WR1, WR2, TE1, RB in these formations. You also don’t see many 4-WR/5-WR formations this year. Mike Martz left town.
What? He can’t block a dead gopher? Humph, details.
by GRLion on Nov 9, 2009 2:24 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Manning vs. Stafford
This is comical. This is like going to a nearby hospital and finding a 3 day old baby that looked like Albert Einstein did at birth and proclaiming, "This child could be the next great genius." All QBs suck their rookie year. What made Manning stand out occurred the next year. He jumped from a 71 QB rating to a 91 rating his sophomore year. He never looked back. In doing so, he became a good QB. In 2004 it jumped another 30 points to 121 in which he became a great QB. He solidified it with 2006 Super Bowl win. I could probably find 100 really bad QBs that had identical numbers to Stafford his first year. Does that mean Stafford will be bad? For you to make any type of comparison when Stafford is so new is fruitless.
by Titts Magee on Nov 9, 2009 2:29 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
About as fruitless as...
proclaiming he is a failure and should be benched?
I agree…though most find its best to fight comedy with comedy.

by CLF on Nov 9, 2009 2:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
CLF
you are way too funny dude. Where do you find this stuff? HAHAHA
I spray paint my dog Honolulu Blue and Silver
Pic - me and the great Herman Moore
by NYCLionsfan on Nov 9, 2009 3:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Its a secret... I'd tell ya, but then I'd have to kill ya.
Poor bambi.
by CLF on Nov 9, 2009 3:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
CLF you are too fucking funny
your making this shitty post-Lions implosion Monday actually bearable!!!
I spray paint my dog Honolulu Blue and Silver
Pic - me and the great Herman Moore
by NYCLionsfan on Nov 9, 2009 3:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Haha
Dude you are too funny
I spray paint my dog Honolulu Blue and Silver
Pic - me and the great Herman Moore
by NYCLionsfan on Nov 9, 2009 4:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
POD needs you
we all need the comic relief you bring to the site. Thanks for the laughs, dude, I needed that
by JazzyBBP on Nov 10, 2009 11:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't forget that the Colts supplied him...
with Edgerrin James and Reggie Wayne in the coming years as well as a great offensive line. The Lions have to do that with Stafford or we will never see his true potential.
by DrewsLions on Nov 9, 2009 2:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We can only hope Staff turns out that way
I don’t really expect Staff to become as good as Peyton, since I believe Peyton could be the best QB to ever play the game, but, I think Staff can be a top 10 QB in the future. He just needs help, he ain’t gonna be able to do it by himself.
2009 = The start of the Lions Golden Age (We hope).
Zack Follett: he will hurt your mind.
by Hyperion Ecta on Nov 9, 2009 9:04 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Seriously?
Listen Detroit, I feel for ya…it’s been rough on you for a long time. I hope you don’t believe that Matt Stafford is the next Peyton though. Let’s be realistic here, Peyton is arguably the best to ever play the game. I wish Matt luck, but this comparison is silly. He may play like Manning’s rookie year every year of his career!!
by rwayne on Nov 11, 2009 6:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Nothing like being a cocky Colts fan.....
Bragging about their even more cocky QB……just because he is as good as he is now, does not mean that he is the best that has ever played. Nor does it mean that it is unrealistic to think that any given rookie QB might be just as good as, if not better, than Peyton Manning.
by KDawg on Nov 11, 2009 8:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Besides
The point of the post wasn’t to anoint Stafford as the next Peyton Manning. It was simply to point out that a bad rookie season isn’t the end of the world.
Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog
by Sean Yuille on Nov 11, 2009 11:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps you should read
Caputo’s last column.
by rbanner on Nov 12, 2009 3:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't have Caputo, but here's Cavuto
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,564742,00.html
What? He can’t block a dead gopher? Humph, details.
by GRLion on Nov 12, 2009 8:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
uhhh....LOL??
And what does that have to do with the price of tea in China?
I assume rbanner means Pat Caputo…….in which case his last article was about Stafford’s upcoming test against Minnesota…..
by KDawg on Nov 12, 2009 8:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
My take on his opinions.....
I disagree. Yeah, Stafford threw 5 INTS…..but to put the loss solely on his shoulders? I can’t see how that is true or even close to fair. However, I do agree that the upcoming game against Minnesota is a big one. I do not agree that his play (as a rookie) in this specific game will be the defining moment of Stafford’s career. If he plays well, it will show that he is progressing and not letting his failures get to him mentally. If he plays poorly, it just means that he is not yet at the level that we need him to be at. If that is the case, it is only a matter of time before he WILL be.
There are a ton of mitigating circumstances surrounding Matt Stafford, and his performances are affected to some degree by each and every one of them. I could go on and on listing circumstances that might make him play poorly or allow him to play well. And Caputo’s intangible signs? How can you judge a rookie QB on his intagible qualities, unless he plain does not have them? He has them…..or else all of the experts would not have been clamoring over him to begin with and we would never have drafted him. Peyton Manning (I hate to keep going back to the same example, but it is a solid one) sucked a big one during his rookie campaign. Did that mean that there were signs that he would turn out to be just another NFL QB? Peyton Manning had all of the intangible qualities as a rookie too…..the rest of it was just plain good coaching and team management. “Signs, Signs, everywhere there’s signs…..blocking up the scenery, breaking my mind…..do this, don’t do that, can’t you read the sign”?
Matt Stafford can not be judged based on his rookie year, on a team coming off of an 0-16 season that is in the beginning stages of rebuilding the shack that Millen built (not much left to build on either). We are basically an expansion team at this point. I will even go so far as to say that he can not truly be judged until at least year 3…..after we have had two more SOLID drafts to put some support figures around him. To say that he will never amount to more than just another NFL QB is ludicrous at this point. Caputo, and anyone else who thinks so, knows that as well as he knows what Angelina Jolie is like in bed.
by KDawg on Nov 12, 2009 8:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
"it is only a matter of time before he WILL be"?
How do you know that? What is the basis for that comment?
Kool-Aid drinking to the nth degree.
What “mitigating circumstances”? Thank you for the 5 Man Electical Band reference, but what the heck are you talking about?
As Caputo plainly states, this was about poor decision making.
Frankly, Angelina’s sexual prowess (or lack there of) has zip to do with on field performance by an NFL QB.
If this is what you expect from the No. 1 overall pick of the draft, then you will be happy with another decade of failure.
I won’t!
by rbanner on Nov 12, 2009 8:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You are as biased as he is......
This was said about Stafford, post draft, by a professional who actually knows what he is talking about (unlike Caputo).
Considered the most NFL-ready quarterback in the 2009 draft, Stafford had been the unquestioned leader of the Bulldogs offense since taking over the starting signal-caller duties as a freshman.
http://www.nfl.com/draft/2009/profiles/matthew-stafford?id=79860#profiles-tabs:players-overview
1) “How do you know that? What is the basis for that comment?”
How do YOU (or Caputo) know that he will not rbanner? You don’t. I drink kool-aid…..what the hell are you drinking? Peyote Tea?
2) “What "mitigating circumstances"? Thank you for the 5 Man Electical Band reference, but what the heck are you talking about?”
You make everyone jump through hoops to figure out what the hell you are talking about, so guess what…..you figure out what I mean for yourself.
3) “As Caputo plainly states, this was about poor decision making.”
Idiotic opinion…….
4) “Frankly, Angelina’s sexual prowess (or lack there of) has zip to do with on field performance by an NFL QB.”
Have you ever heard of something called a “figurative comparison”? Caputo knows that Matt Stafford will be nothing more than just another NFL QB (based on 7 games as a rookie and the very first game that he will have already faced the team he will again oppose), just as well as he knows what Angelina Jolie is like in bed. Did I STUTTER?
5) “If this is what you expect from the No. 1 overall pick of the draft, then you will be happy with another decade of failure.”
At least my expectations are realistic. You expect a rookie QB to come in and immediately be able to play like a Hall of Fame bound 10 year veteran, on a team with very little talent to support him.
6) “I won’t!”
I don’t care what you will and will not do……and neither does anyone else on this blog.
by KDawg on Nov 12, 2009 9:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So from your response
1. You don’t know and all you have in response is nanny, nanny, bo, boo.
2. You cannot tell me what you mean, even when asked, and all you have is nanny, nanny, boo,boo.
3. Caputo has given a preofessional and your response is…well…nanny, nanny, boo, boo.
4. Caputo ahs not seen Angelina in bed (presumably). He has seen Staff on the field. So perhaps you did STUTTER or, more likely, your response was nanny, nanny, boo, boo.
5. 1 win is realistic? 2 wins is unrealistic? 3? Or is it your response is simply nanny, nanny, boo, boo.
6. You don’t care. This is the problem.
by rbanner on Nov 13, 2009 6:51 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You have seen Stafford on the field and so have I.....
as well as everyone else here. Does that mean that you know anything more that your own biased, retarded, opinion? Obviously not, and neither do we or Caputo for that matter. Caputo has given a professional opinion, and it stinks……something I am sure you are familiar with.
All I have is “nanny, nanny, boo, boo”? All you have is neahhhhhhh……stay away from sharp knives, your might hurt yourself in one of your spasms.
I can tell you what I mean. I choose not to because I am feeding you your own medicine. How’s it taste?
Realistic expectation for Matt Stafford is that he is a rookie on a very bad team. We should expect him to struggle, which he is doing. You expect him to be so good that he can turn the entire team and the losing culture of the franchise around immediately. Grow up child…..your expectations for Stafford are equivalent to an unknowing 4 year old’s expectations of getting gifts from Santa on Christmas.
I care about the FUTURE of the Lions…..I do not care about you or your moronic opinions. You are the problem here. If you left, the problem would be solved.
by KDawg on Nov 13, 2009 1:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I expect more than 1 win
And yet you call that expecting too much.
I give you the opinions of others (you should have heard Schlereth knock Stafford on Cowherd’s show) and yet you claim it is my “biased, retarded” opinion.
“the problem would be solved”? Yeah, I’m sure Stafford and Schwartz stay up at night worried about my posts?
You have no business calling anyone “retarded” after a post like that.
The problem is the execution between the lines on Sunday (or Thursday, as the case may be). I have 0 effect on that.
And if you did not get gifts as a four-year-old, blame your parents. Not me!
by rbanner on Nov 13, 2009 1:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not talking about wins.....I'm talking about Stafford
Quit trying to talk in circles…..you sound like John Engler when asked a question he can’t answer.
Oh yeah, Mark Schlereth is the epitome of football intelligence all of a sudden? Ron Jaworski is smarter, and that is not a compliment.
Anyone who thinks they can tell what kind of QB that Stafford will turn out to be, after only 6 games played, is a retard…..plain and simple.
At least you have the sense to admit that you have no effect on what happens on the field. That said, why don’t you shut up? My statement about “the problem” had nothing to do with Stafford or the Lions. There is no problem there. Stafford is a rookie and the Lions are a bad team in the rebuilding process. Ray Charles and Stevie Wonder can see that, why can’t you?
The problem, since there is no problem to speak of for the Lions that can be corrected this year (and your pedantic ramblings are doing nothing but irritating the shit out of everyone here), is YOU. The problem is right here on this very blog. YOU are the problem. You come here and spread your negativity like a dirty, crab infested, cum stained blanket and you don’t know when to shut your mouth! You act like your knowledge is superior to everyone else, you continuously ask people to clarify what they are saying, so that you can wrap the concept around your pea brain, yet you NEVER clarify what it is that you are saying (like it is just so plain and clear as black and white on a newspaper), and you twist everyone’s words to your own purposes even if it comes off as childish, yet you claim to be the eldest Lion’s fan on this blog…..very mature!
Anyone can see that there are problems with the current state of the Detroit Lions, yet you insist on stating the obvious day in and day out, with your I told you so attitude.. One player is no more to blame than any other! You can not single out one man on this team and hang the fact that we have only won one game solely on his shoulders! Not even Jeff Backus! So I said that your opinion was biased and retarded….I was assuming that you formed your own opinion and didn’t take the opinion of a slack jawed, brain damaged commentator who once played offensive guard for the Redskins. Did you know that Mark Schlereth couldn’t read until he was 7 years old? He also pissed his game pants because there was no restroom on the sidelines, earning him the nickname “Stink”. Some role model…..I’m glad you hold his opinion in such high regard. It speaks volumes to your level of intelligence.
Give the gift of silence rbanner…..we will all be grateful.
by KDawg on Nov 13, 2009 2:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
By the way
Before you make some infantile quip about Ray Charles being dead, I am well aware of that fact….and he can still “see” better than you ever will.
by KDawg on Nov 13, 2009 2:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Why don't you
shut up? The only “retard” comment is blaming me for the Lions problems.
Here is an example of an extremely negative quote: “Do we deserve less at this point?” when referencing the line on the Lions game. Guess who the poster was? That guy should simply shut up forever.
I am responding to your posts. What am I “saying”? The words speak for themselves. They are opinions from me, at times, but often, the opinions of others. For some reason, even though these are professions I reference, the opinions are “retarded” or “it stinks” or some other negative. And yet I get called Ray Charles for not being able to see?
When you get a job at ESPN, let me know and I will treat your comments with equal reverence.
BTW, does anyone here know once upon a time KDawg’s mommy changed his diapers? About as much relevance as what Stink did or did not due when he was 7!
by rbanner on Nov 13, 2009 2:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Blah blah blah
Hi everyone, my name is rbanner…..I can’t think of any kind of intelligent comeback, so instead I will just sit here and cry like a baby and put words in people’s mouths. I will search for any relevant comment that the person of my current attention has made in the past, that may be used as a defense to take attention away from my own faults and stupidity. I am too old to understand the current use of the English language, so I misinterpret everything that anyone says so that it suits my ancient way of thinking. I respect nobody, but I expect everyone to bow down and kiss my feet because I am simply superior to everyone else, in every way imaginable. I am the be all and end all of every discussion, and I will not stop until I have the last word. I am a stubborn jackass who should invest in hooked on phonics so that I might better comprehend the written words I try to read. I do not understand sarcasm or a direct insult when I read it, so I just twist words around, indirectly making myself look even dumber and infinitely immature. I am as ignorant as a person can possibly be, yet I think I am the smartest person here. People tend to tell me to shut up or go away, but I just continue to hang around where I am not wanted because I like to force my negativity and ignorant beliefs on others. I thrive on the angry responses that I get…..it tickles me in a special way when I upset people. I have gone through my life being hated or loathed at a minimum, and while I am deeply miserable inside I can not stop being annoying, ignorant, condescending, patronizing, bitter, negative, and petty, so I will probably be miserable for the rest of my life. I have worked a lifetime trying to deny these facts to my mind’s eye, and I have done this for so long that I no longer even realize what a prick I truly am. I really wish I could just shut my mouth and say I’m sorry for acting this way, but old habits are hard to break and I am too pathetic to start being a man now. I will never admit that I was wrong, I will never answer a direct question that I am asked (especially if the answer will make me look bad), and I will continue to be set in my ways because I know no other way. F the world, F the Lions, and F you if you don’t like it……I am here to stay because I can hide behind my computer screen where nobody can break my nose or jaw and force me to leave. The internet is my favorite tool to cause anxiety and force my own misery on everyone I possibly can. Thank God none of you know where I live! WOOHOO!
by KDawg on Nov 13, 2009 4:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Surely he surpasses Raphie?
2009 = The start of the Lions Golden Age (We hope).
Zack Follett: he will hurt your mind.
by Hyperion Ecta on Nov 13, 2009 6:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Without a doubt.....
Just look below…..he has to have the last word and he never shuts his mouth.
by KDawg on Nov 14, 2009 2:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Intelligent Comeback?
Compared to your lack of focus, mishmash,; by post was a master opus!
If you have a specific “misinterpertation” complaint, state it?
Apparently, you don’t, just as you have no “intelligent comeback”.
What does one’s attitude have to do with whether or not they are correct?
And sinking to violence is cowardly. It seems means you cannot forge an “intelligent comeback”.
This is really a new low for you Dawg. Truly sad!
by rbanner on Nov 14, 2009 8:39 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll take that as a compliment.....
Coming from someone like you.
by KDawg on Nov 14, 2009 2:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You are a teenager aren't you.....
You aren’t an adult. No way.
by KDawg on Nov 14, 2009 10:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I've wondered that myself....
It’s easy to look up a few facts on the internet, sprinkle them in as claims of personal experience, and pretend to be much older. If it turns out he’s a teenager pretending to be 50+, it wouldn’t surprise me, considering the lack of maturity.
(Age, of course, is no guarantee of maturity……but teenagers tend to be more immature, due to the fact that they’re not yet adults. They’re still developing emotionally, and don’t have as much experience to give them perspective)
What? He can’t block a dead gopher? Humph, details.
by GRLion on Nov 15, 2009 2:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Anything to run away
from your failed attempts at defensing the indefensible.
by rbanner on Nov 15, 2009 3:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Just not going to continue to justify your nonsense
by stooping to your level. It doesn’t matter what defense there is or isn’t because you are set in your opinion no matter what anyone says, and you have the ill conceived notion that you are the only person who is right, when it is obvious that you are the only person with your opinion.
News flash brainless…..when you are the only person who thinks something is right, chances are it is wrong. Wake up.
by KDawg on Nov 16, 2009 2:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
News flash, genius (emphasis on sarcasm)
It is not my opinion “only” as I have shown you from source after source. You want to continue to talk about my sources childhood, fine. It has nothing to do with anything.
Glad you liked the Lions chances Sunday. How’d that work out for you?
by rbanner on Nov 16, 2009 5:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Source to source
You only pick info from morons who share your idiotic opinions. You cherry pick your info to suit your own purposes. Your opinions are most assuredly the minority.
by KDawg on Nov 17, 2009 2:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Stink is a moron?
Tark is a moron? Caputo is a moron?
Perhaps, but people actually pay them for their opinions.
When you get to that level, let me know.
My opinions may or may not be in the minority, but that does not mean I am wrong.
The bottom line is in the W column.
by rbanner on Nov 17, 2009 3:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
In your opinion
Which may happen to be the same as Fran’s, Stink’s, and Caputo’s…..opinions which I hold no value to, much like yours.
I do not have to get paid to have an opinion or declare what I see as right or wrong. My opinion happens to be along with the majority this time. We are a team rebuilding, not a team that can be expected to win a bunch of games. I think it is wrong to expect them to produce right away, coming off an 0-16 season with a new GM and coaching staff. They are starting from scratch!
by KDawg on Nov 17, 2009 11:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So the pros are morons
and you are the genius?
Who is expecting to “win a bunch of games”?
And why are they “starting from scratch”? Because those in charge should never have been hired in the first place?
Keeping the expectations low only assures a lack of success!
by rbanner on Nov 18, 2009 7:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
At least my opinion is supported by a majority of "the experts"
YOU were expecting the Lions to have some miracle season full of wins! YOU had set unreasonable expectations for Matt Stafford and this team! Those in charge are just as good as ANYONE else would be with the CURRENT team! Keeping the expectations REALISTIC is what keeps a majority of us FANS who will not ABANDON their team SANE!
People like YOU are the type of people that cause crime to occur, cause people to lose their cool, cause people to HATE. You enjoy it, and it makes me want to puke on your shoes. You want to say you aren’t wrong? Well you most definitely aren’t right either, in more ways than one.
You are pathetic. Your own life is so devoid of happiness that you have to come here and try to make our lives as miserable as yours. You are a sad excuse for a human being. You have nothing better to do than slam the owner of the Lions, the GM, the coaching staff, and even the players? What is the point if it is not to PISS people OFF?
by KDawg on Nov 18, 2009 12:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Post fantasy
as you cannot deal with reality. “miracle season”? “full of wins”? “unrealistic expections”? This is all make believe that you have conjured up, Harry.
You were the one posting you liked the Lions chances against the Vikes. How’d that work out for you? Whose expections on that game were “unrealistic”?
You talk about threats of violence on people and have the nerve to call anyone else “pathetic”? Look in a mirror.
The point of the post (as if I need to repeat myself) is to show how the current regime has run down a once great franchise for decades.
This is a fact. Why would you even try to dispute it?
I am not againt the team. On the contrary.
But ownership and management have FAILED the fans. Do you really argue that?
by rbanner on Nov 18, 2009 7:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I never made any threat, Jack.
And if I did, I would follow through.
You are the master of twisting people’s words around to suit your interpretations.
I can’t deal with reality…..HA HA…..you’re the one who’s own dementia is preventing you from remembering what you say. That’s the problem with spouting lies, starting controversy, and running your mouth like the Niagra Falls.
I did like the Lion’s chances against the Vikings. How was that unrealistic? We should have beaten them the first time around, and we were not out of the game the second time until the 4th quarter. Just because I said I like our chances does not mean that I “expected” them to win. It means I liked the chances that we could win.
By “the current regime” you are referring to William Clay Ford? Everyone else has come and gone. Ford hires and fires people, and then he is hands off. In the end he is the only man accountable for the success or failure of the organization as a whole…..there is no arguing that. However, I believe he made decisions that he thought would be successful. Why would he intentionally try to run his own team into the ground for decades?
Holy shit……you admitted to being a Lion’s fan (even if indirectly). Alert the presses! No matter what the owner and management does, it all comes down to the players. You could have the best Owner, GM, and coaching staff in the world and still fail if your players did not play up to their expected levels. Nobody knew that Charles Rogers, Mike Williams, Joey Harrington, etc etc would be busts. You can say all day long that there were signs…..but signs do not mean shit when it comes down to the brass taxes. The draft is a crap shoot, and all you can do is look for potential and try to draw it into reality.
I think it is funny that you are still coming in here and checking this thread. My point is proven over and over…..you can not stand it unless you get the last word.
by KDawg on Nov 19, 2009 6:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nobody knew?
Perhaps not, but Mariucci didn’t want Joey to start when he did, did not want Mike and probably did not advocate for Rodgers according to Fanhouse and interviews I have seen with him.
It is funny you keep posting nonsense and state your point is proven.
Maybe you should have moved on to game 7? Or maybe you would see that that one blew up in your face?
by rbanner on Nov 20, 2009 10:26 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Mr Last Word
LOL…..point proven.
I’m all done. You win. You are the master. I am wrong and you are the all knowing. When I start dreaming of arguing with your dumb ass, it is time to move on.
by KDawg on Nov 20, 2009 2:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
TMI
I want no part of your dreams. I simply have no idea where you get the idea you have proven any point.
Hell, you may well get to blast on me next week, because if Staff is going to have a good game this year, Sunday is the best candidate!
by rbanner on Nov 20, 2009 3:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I love you rbanner.....
I hope you never get tired of running your mouth. I hope you never leave this blog. I hope you live to be 103 years old, just so your wonderfully enlightening presence can remain here for a few more years. Please stay rbanner…..PLEASE DON’T LEAVE US!! FOR THE LOVE OF GOD PLEASE DON’T EVER LEAVE!! You are the next best thing to apple pie. You are the wind beneath everyone’s wings…..and the hot air of all of our balloons.
You are the MAN, and so today I salute you…..
(We interrupt this blog for a commercial break):
Bud Light presents…Real Men of Genius.
(Real Men of Genius …)
Today we salute you, Mr. Unathletic Sports Supporter Guy.
(Mr. Unathletic Sports Supporter Guy …)
You know everything there is to know about the world of sports. Except how to play them.
(No coordination…)
You talk sports for eight hours a day. Which is seven hours and 45 minutes more than anyone listens.
(Is anybody out there?)
Those who can, do. Those who can’t, teach. Those who can’t do, or teach, talk.
(I’m really good at talking …)
So crack open an ice cold Bud Light, Mr. Unathletic Supporter. You may never make the company softball team, but you’ll always be a hit with us.
(Mr. Unathletic Sports Supporter Guy…)

For all you do…..this Bud’s for you.
by KDawg on Nov 12, 2009 10:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
+1
rbanner…….
I kinda wish you would rban yourself. Or just go away…..
I really like this blog, and enjoy debating with everyone here, (except you).
I think you should start your own blog. You can call it
“Ifuckinghatethelionsandidonteverwantthemtowincausethatwouldmeanthaticantspoutmyoldassmouthofandberightaboutonethinginlife.com”
I think the domain name is open, I’ll give ya a hit every once in a while. (NOT!!!)
GO THE EFF!!!! AWAY!!!!! GO LIONS!!!!!!!!!
by j16941 on Nov 13, 2009 7:31 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We should make a post dedicated to those
You gotta love the Bud Light commercials.
2009 = The start of the Lions Golden Age (We hope).
Zack Follett: he will hurt your mind.
by Hyperion Ecta on Nov 13, 2009 6:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs





















