Wild Card
There has been much ado lately about Detroit's unsettled quarterback position. They had five different quarterbacks take snaps last year, yet the team seems completely uncertain who, if the season started today, would be the starting quarterback. I've heard every option thrown out there. From Kitna taking over again, to Culpepper staying on, to resigning Orlovsky, to drafting someone, to trading for Matt Cassell, to looking at guys like Warner or Collins in free agency and the list goes on and on. The intriguing part of this for me is who is not being talked about might be the best option.
Of course, this early in the year, management is not going to come out and endorse a starter at the QB position. Not on a team that just went 0-16. But the guy they are not mentioning could be the wild card they are holding as leverage through the draft. No one's heard hide-nor-hair of Drew Stanton the last few weeks and there's several ways to take this silence.
First, he may simply be a non-issue. Schwartz and Linehan may have looked at his progress, style and mechanics and just said, "he's got too far to go and has no chance to start". Simply put, he may be a project... nothing more. Maybe there is just nothing to read into and he's just a guy under contract that gives them a little insurance as a third string guy who comes relatively cheap. This could very well be the case, but I have to say that I don't buy into this approach easily. In the few starts and small amount of playing time, he was no worse than any starter that got a full week of snaps in practice. To be fair, he was probably the most exciting player that suited up last year at the position. Kitna was his usual "try-to-do-too-much-with-not-enough-talent" self and continued his barrage of fourth quarter interceptions. Culpepper was simply rusty and not ready to start. Orlovsky played well at times, but appeared timid and did not take enough risks. With Stanton, he never really wowed you, but you could see his enthusiasm and athleticism and could feel his potential with each snap. I just can't imagine that he won't be given a chance next year.
The second way you can look at the Stanton situation is the fact that he could be the guy management has in mind for the starter. Is this really so far fetched? He was a second round pick and going into his third season. He should be ready to start right now. I know that he's had a rough start to his career, but with a full off-season under Linehan and some meaningful snaps/starts in pre-season, he should be ready to lead this team. Mayhew may just be keeping this situation under wraps as leverage in the draft. It could be that they believe in this kid and they have absolutely no intentions of drafting Stafford or Sanchez with the first overall pick. They can even use this as trade leverage - although it'll be tough to trade out of that top pick anyway you slice it. The funny thing is that no one is asking Mayhew, Lewand, Schwartz or Linehan questions about Stanton. It's as if the media and fans have forgotten we have him. I think this is mostly due to Marinelli/Martz/Colletto's mismanagement of him over the last two years. People are just writing him off. Also, he's under contract and so there is no reason to talk about him from that respect. The fact is, he could indeed be the wild card that Mayhew has up his sleeve. It might just surprise everyone come draft day or when they trade Kitna or release Culpepper or make some other surprising move that gives the first indication that Stanton might be given a shot.
This, of course, is all purely speculation on my part. But management still has to have a plan for Stanton, regardless of whether it is challenging as a starter, trade bait or as Linehan's pet project. I just find it a bit intriguing that no one has been talking about him and management has not mentioned him when discussing the quarterback situation for next year. They might just have big plans for him. What do you guys think?
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The silence is interesting.....
But my best guess is that he is just a non-factor. I always think back to Rod’s quote saying that he didn’t want Stanton to embarass himself out there. When you are a winless ball club you give the ball to your 2nd round draft pick quarterback. The only way you dont is if he is just awful in practice and gives you no reason to hope and believe in him. It must be simple as that. He’s just not any good.
Not their guy
I agree that I’m still intrigued by Stanton. If for no reason other than the uncertainty. We’ve seen enough of the other guys to have a pretty good idea of what we’re gonna get. Unfortunately I can’t see Stanton as part of the long term plan of the new regime. Typically when there is a major overhaul like the Lions just had, the incoming staff is reluctant to put the keys to a player that they didn’t bring in themselves. This happened with Miami and John Beck, Buffalo with JP Losman, and Jacksonville with David Garrard (he was drafted by Coughlin to be Brunell’s successor but when Del Rio took over wanted his own guy and drafted Leftwich). I want to be clear that i am NOT comparing Stanton’s abilities (or lack there of) with any of those quarterbacks but the situation is similar and I think Schwartz and company are going to want to put their stamp on the team. If they go with one of the current QBs on the roster it’ll probably be one of the more experienced ones while drafting the QB of the future either this year or next.
I have one caveat here and that is Mayhew and Lewand. Since they were part of the decision making process that brought Stanton in, they may still have some attachment to him and may ask Schwartz to give him a shot.
Ill have to Disagree
Drew has played in three regular season and two preseason games in two years. Two injuries have severerly limited his practice time and game experience. He is not even close to your average 3rd year player in experience. He was healthy finally the last 8 games or so of last year and saw only very limited time on a team that was searching for options so hard that they signed a guy in Daunte who hadn’t played well in forever. And while the coaching staff wasn’t the best at evaluating talent I still think that is important that nobody trusted Stanton.
I have to admit, the only potential I saw while watching Stanton was the possibility of an injury.
All that said I would love for him to be the answer in house so we don’t have to waste a pick on a QB. I think he will be back and given a chance, and hopefully he spent all his time missed studying film and learning what to do, leaving him left with what to do.
Its a funny story actually.
Give Him a shot
if you don’t give him a shot then there is another Lions Bust you could end up throwing away 2 picks on this guy him and a guy to replace him all i know is i would rather them give Stanton a chance then Draft a QB in the 1st round this year if he doesn’t work out Draft a guy coming out next year
Just remember. It was Jim Colletto that made remarks about not wanting Stanton to embarrass himself. Colletto should be embarrassed. A TOTAL LOSER wherever he’s been. So glad he’s gone. I’m a Michigan fan, but give the kid a chance. Much like Dizon. Find out what you have. Culpepper, NO. Jon Kitten, NO. Resign Dan-O and work with what you have.
Non-Factor
I like Stanton as a project, but if I’m looking forward to next season, I’m keeping Culpepper. He has taken a lot of knocks for how he played last season, but we’re talking about a guy who hadn’t played any football in some time getting thrown under center five days after getting his playbook.
While I understand there was a reason for his extended layoff (sub-par play for an awful team while pushing himself too quickly after a career-threatening knee injury) Culpepper is a decent NFL starter with mobility and toughness… and he WANTS to play for us. Culpepper to Johnson, with a beefed-up offensive line, could remind us of Culpepper to Moss. We all know that CJ works harder than Moss ever did.
As for the rest of the quarterbacks, I think we keep Orlovsky as the back-up and then cut everyone else so we can sign someone off the scrap heap for next to nothing… a Gus Frerotte type.
"Order your soul; reduce your wants; live in charity; associate in Christian community; obey the laws; trust in Providence."
-Augustine
culpepper is done
culpepper in his last season with minnesota….BEFORE the injury:
6 TDS, 12 INTS
he was nothing without moss. it baffles me how so many lions fans keep making excuses for culpepper’s poor play over the last 3 years. “he played for bad teams”, “he had injuries”, “he didn’t know the system”. let’s face facts here. culpepper SUCKS and now he doesn’t even have his mobility any more. he’s never had the skills to be a pure pocket passer and he’s due a $2.5 million roster bonus this year. the lions need to cut him and re-sign dan-o on the cheap. i dont’ really care if they give stanton a shot or not because i just don’t think he’ll be in the long term plans for the future. but that $2.5 million can be used to bring in some free agents at other positions. the culpepper experiment was a mistake to begin with. it’s time to move on.
Sleeper
I think he his more the sleeper guy.. Thrown under the bus by the former OC who probable told the head coach Rod , who was clueless in the offensive side of the ball, that he was not ready. I don’t think that they could adjust the team to his style of play and wanted to leave as much the same as possable so not to disrupte what little progress thay had made. Give him time and reps and he will be better than daunte or jon and cost less. Resigning Dan O. I think is a must with a bad o-line he still put decent numbers and was connecting with Calvin and the running game was coming along.
Non-factor
First, the positives: I love Stanton’s arm strength and his mobility but lets be honest here. When given a chance to play he did little. Now the negatives: (1) For every touchdown he threw, he threw a pic just a short time later. (2) For every nice run he had, still he had others where he immediately pulled the ball down and ran even with receivers open down the field. (3) He had to call time outs because he didn’t have command and control of the offense. The rest of the team didn’t help him much but he clearly wasn’t ready to start.
I’ll go with the young, project QB label. Stanton has some tools but he needs to sit, learn Linehan’s offense and learn to be a passer first and runner second. His running ability is a great luxury to have but he can’t rely on that as his first option in the NFL like he did at times last year.
W
What to do...
First off, I don’t think the Lions will resign Dan O., he has shown that the best he will be is 2nd string, and there are plenty of quality back-ups this year in free agency.
I also think that Kitna’s days are done in Detroit, and he will be released or traded. After he was benched and put on IR, he stopped showing up to games and told the media he was very unhappy with the situation. Even before he was benched, you could see his frustration with the team as he wasted time outs and argued with coaches every game.
As far as free agency goes, I think the best we could do is a quality back up, none of the higher-level players (Collins, Warner) would want to come here and I don’t see us spending a couple million on a qb that will retire in a year, when we have stop gap qb’s already on the roster.
The Lions have 2 realistic options. The first is to draft a qb this year if one proves to be a clear #1 pick and appears to be a safe pick after the combine. The other option is a little bit more complicated. The lions start Culpepper this year, as he (in my opinion) showed the most potential last year, because despite being given 5 days to learn plays, no training camp whatsoever and being off the field for almost a year, he showed a spark. He looked more competitive than any of the other qbs we had. He even looked like a true veteran leader, something Kitna never embraced. Even when he would get benched, he cheered on the other players and celebrated with them when they would score. He also is not as washed up or talentless as many would like to claim. When someone is as competitive as an NFL football player and has the talent, anything can happen (look at Warner, Collins this year). Anyways, you start Culpepper after a full/quality offseason and after rebuilding the oline and defense in the draft/free agency. You also have Stanton start his development, since it has been marred by poor coaching in the past. If you see him develop into a starting qb, you give him a shot next year to compete for a starting role, and either retain Culpepper(depending on performance), start Stanton, or draft a qb next year. But if Stanton still doesn’t look like a starter, you cut him, if Culpepper doesn’t look great, you either cut him or resign him as a backup(with a backups salary), and then you draft the qb we need.
Wow, that is probably alot easier to talk about in person than to write/read on a computer.
Anyways, here’s my problem with Stanton. For starters, he is injury prone. He blew his own chance to start/come in when Kitna got dropped when he broke his pinky. He blew the opportunity he got near the end of the season when he got that concussion. So everytime he takes a snap, we have to worry about him being hurt and out for a couple of weeks. If you look at all of the franchice qb’s pretty much ever, they have durability. Look at Brady, he gets hurt and people even doubt if he will ever start again. Injurys and qbs do not go together.
Now, many of you are saying, how can you champion Daunte while at the same time putting Drew down. He was injured, right. The difference is that one, Culpepper had established himself as a quality qb prior to getting hurt. I’m also not saying that Culpepper is our answer to the next ten years of football, I’m saying he’ll be the best option for the next 2-3 until we build a quality team and can afford the first round pick to be spent on a qb that can come in and be set-up to succeed with a strong o-line and a good defense that gives the offense a chance to score points and not always play from behind.
Culpepper hasn't been a quality QB in years
Not since he was paired in MN with Moss. he’s older, slow and also injury prone. He won’t stand in the pocket and follow his progressions, he’d rather pull it in and hobble off for a loss.
The experiment is over. Time to cut both Culpepper and Kitna. Draft a QB this year and let Stanton and the new guy duke it out in camp. If they don’t want to take a QB this year, snag a temp out of FA (Simms, maybe) and take a signal caller next year.
"A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five." ~Groucho Marx
AMEN
couldn’t have said it better myself. not only is he bad but he hasn’t played a full season in 5 years!!!
I completely disagree with all the negatives here...
First of all, Jim Colletto is the worst O-Coordinator of all time, and his O-Line brain absolutely can’t be trusted for QB assessment, he was woefully underqualified for the job and proved it. Proof is in the pudding, and in this case the pudding is the 4 downs and goal where on 3rd down Colletto inexplicably threw Kevin Smith a fade rather than Calving Johnson who was in single coverage. I have wanted to punch Colletto’s stupid, fat face and old man glasses quite often, but never more so than after his Stanton comments. As if the O-Coordinator of the worst team of all time had any inkling what he was talking about, give me a break. If you trust anything the 2008-2009 coaching staff said, you aren’t just stupid, you are colletto stupid.
Second of all, Stanton did show promise in the games he actually played, showing decent accuracy and good strength. His main problem is impatience and turning to the run instead of going through his reads.
He will be as good as any QB in the Detroit situation. So don’t waste a 1st -rounder or free agent money on a new QB. Here is a script for the lions first drive of 2009 regardless of who is at QB IF THEY DON’T DRAFT A GOOD LEFT TACKLE.
1st Down – Kevin Smith gets blown up in the backfield after Jeff “The Human Turnstyle” Backus let his man through with the resistance of the paper banner at the end of the opening game tunnel.
2nd Down – Cherilus gets so nervous with the knowledge that he is possibly the best lineman on the team that he false starts.
3rd Down – QB of the day (again, doesn’t matter who it is) scrambles around for 30 seconds trying to find an open man, but can’t because Calvin is in quadruple coverage and Standeford forgot his gloves that day. Painful, highlight reel-quality QB sack for a ten yard loss.
4th Down – Punt, then rinse and repeat for another 58 minutes
Plus, when the other team gets the ball, they have the same 0-16 team to throw against, minus our best Safety and Cornerback, BECAUSE THEY DRAFTED AND F-ING QB AND THUS WAITED FOR THE 3RD ROUND TO PICK DEFENSE>
Damn it, damn it, damn it, please be smart and rebuild.
by damnitdamnitdamnit on Feb 15, 2009 3:19 PM EST reply actions
Give stanton his shot
Gentleman let’s look at our choices here…
1st option Keep Culpepper, hope that him be reunited with his old O.C. helps him out and he can regains 1/2 of his old form. Why I think this won’t happen 1st his playing weight was probably around 285lbs, he’ll be 31 or 32 even though thats not that old, do you really want to build your team around a QB with his best day’s behind him. Lastly all his sucess came as a mobile QB and let’s face it that knee could be a time bomb.
2nd option keep Kitna, enough said
3rd option try to bring in Collins or Warner, I heard plenty of people talking about signing one of the two, WHY, both are at end of their career. Both are coming from teams with pretty good O-lines, so what makes you think their be able to stay off there backs here. Warner likes too throw the ball that’s what he is a gun slinger. Collins has history with our new HC but to me Collins is a game manager. An older version of Dan O. He won’t win alot of games for you neither will he lose them for you.
4th option draft a QB. I’ve heard this one alot too, my feeling if you don’t have an O-line to protect a franchise QB your wasting the pick I’ve never seen rookie QB do well behind shotty O-line and thats what we have right now. 2nd you can’t put that kind of pressure on a rookie QB to score 28 to 35 points a game because that’s how many of defence gives up. Their bound to go through growing pains and throw a couple bad picks, if our defence still sucks you can take those picks and turn them into 7 points real quick.
5th option, Drewslions is right Stanton played just as well as any of the other QB on the roster given his playing time. Culpepper looked rusty will it go I don’t know but I’d rather put the time into a younger QB, Did Stanton ever embarrass himself when he played, no. In preseason he looked pretty good before he got hurt. A QB is like a pitcher if you mess with their head and throwing menanics there going to lose it for a while. Now that Martz is gone and colleto gone maybe the OC won’t call him an embarrassment and work with the kid. Listen I’m not saying give him the job out right but why dont you resign Dan O for insurance and let the two battle it out. If they want these two QB to act as stop gaps before they find their franchise QB fine, then take this time and build your O-line and D-line your be surpised how much better your QB look when both side are playing good.
We do have options, I'm unsure whether they are good ones.
The choices you presented does give the front office an abundance of choice for this coming season, but are they good choices. I’m not sure they are.
1st- Culpepper- I don’t think he’s entirely bad, he’s not the future of this team but if he can keep the spot at least partially warm for a future QB than OK. But, that’s only if he can prove himself worthy of starting by beating out the other QB’s on the team. I also think that CJ has just as much talent to be a second Moss for Culpepper to hook up with, he just needs another guy in the secondary to take some pressure off CJ.
2nd- Kitna- Like you said, enough said.
3rd- Free Agent- Personally, I don’t think Warner or Collins will do much different from Culpepper. Plus, I don’t see them leaving there respective teams. If someone like Simms is brought in then they should have the same chance as the others, and if they come out on top, so be it.
4th- Draft- If Stafford grades out as the no.#1 prospect, I say take him. Hopefully, he can survive one year of sacks and INTs and still have the mental ability to gain confidence in his 2nd year with a hopefully better team.
5th- Stanton- Like a lot of you have said, I think their is some talent in Stanton. Whether he is our future, Unlikely. Like all the others, if he can prove himself at training camp then he should start.
by Hyperion Ecta on Feb 15, 2009 5:53 PM EST up reply actions
If Stanton is the wild card
then Mayhew is dealing with a dead deck. I am fine with them giving him a shot and I would rather see him in there come September than Stafford but I am not expecting much. He is too brittle and was a poor decision maker in college. My gut tells me that Stanton will never truly get a shot in Detroit and will be tossed on the pile of other Millen busts. If he gets a shot I wish him the best but, again, my expectations will be very low.
by tigerfaninChicago on Feb 15, 2009 5:00 PM EST reply actions
Culpepper = straw man
Drew, great post.
I’ve said for quite a while that Culepper was the straw man brought in for Stanton to knock over. I thought at the time that Mayhew brought in Culpepper to be the guy that goes down with the ship, the one who suffers the slings and arrows of the boo birds, while Stanton remains an uknown quantity. If they’d just thrown Stanton in and he’d done poorly (as he probably would have, given how hard it was to look good for the Lions last year), the Lions would be almost forced to draft a QB. Now, however, Stanton is an unknown quantity, so if the Lions don’t draft a QB he’s still a ‘maybe’ as the QB of the future.
Moreover, if the organization is really high on Stanton, they might want him to “win” a traning camp compeition between him and “the veteran starter”. If “the veteran starter” is Culpepper, he’s going to be easier to beat out than Kitna or Orlovsky . . .
Peace
Ty
http://thelionsinwinter.blogspot.com
by ty@thelionsinwinter on Feb 16, 2009 1:15 PM EST reply actions
I've said it a million times...
that the ‘08 Lions biggest mistake was not seeing what they had in Stanton. This mistake will probably cost them a draft pick – the top overall to boot. Now they have to play it safe because they don’t know what to expect from Stanton. They will more than likely be forced to carry a vet and draft a young guy because Stanton now falls so far into the void of the unknown. Just another reason that the Lions were justified in firing Marinelli.
I'd rather see Stanton lose, I've seen the other do that already.
Its funny anyone would call Stanton injury prone, who wasn’t at QB last year? Also, I remember Stanton winning games behind a similar offense and with a garbage defense at Michigan State. Beef up the offensive line with one of two first round picks and use one of the two third round pics on a quality back up RB so Kevin Smith doesn’t end up like Kevin Jones. You do this and you still have a first, second & third round pick and free agency to beef up on defense. To only evaluate a player based on practice is dumb and short sighted. Maybe even tailor the offense to him like countless other teams do with their QB’s. How much game time did Pete, Ware, Majakowski, Kraig, Batch, and especially Harrington get to develop? I’d definitely say more that Stanton. Writing him off after a few snaps and a couple injuries is just dumb because any QB would have been injured behind our line last year. Don’t waste a pick on a QB because it will not have an instant impact. A QB early has never turned around a team with as many needs as Detroit right now.

by 




























