Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: How Not To Criticize Tom Brady For The Patriots' Loss

Quarterback possibilities and did the running game really get better?

Assume for a moment that we will not be taking a quarterback with the first overall pick.

On board at the moment we have Orlovsky, Kitna, Culepepper, and Stanton. Kitna has all but been released so I think that we can realistically rule him out of the picture leaving us with Culepepper, Orlovsky and Stanton. In all reality I belive that you're looking at Daunte as being the starter for the beginning run of the 2009 season. I do not however see him as being healthy for that long. Which will eventually lead into Orlovsky starting. I don't think with the players we have in place right now that Orlovsky could really thrive or be a difference maker in the game, and when the team finds out that Culepepper's injury is season ending they're going to need to make a play at a FA QB to fill that 3rd spot. I didn't think Mayhew was the type of person to shake things up, but he did that when he went out and signed Culepepper late last season. Drew Stanton seeing some playing time I think is a real distant possibility.

I'm not going to lie, I'm one of those people that's on the Drew Stanton bandwagon. Grew up in Michigan, played very well at MSU and didn't make any great big huge mistakes when he did see playing time last year. Like say for instance running out of the back of the endzone, or coming out of retirement. I do not however think he has the potential to be the QB of the future. He's not the next coming of John Elway but I do strongly believe he is the teams best chance at winning some games this year. As mentioned previously on this site he did just as well as Orlovsky under center and didn't have the benefit of receiving all of those snaps that a starter does during the week that Orlovsky did.

Now lets rebuttle my initiall assumption. Lets say we do draft Matt Stafford what is the best way to go about his learning curve? Do you throw him to the wolves and hope that he can build some type of chemistry with Johnson early? Or do you allow him to mature on the sidelines while learning the system? In the recent years I can only think of a few first round QB picks that have panned out to be worth a crap: Eli Manning, Ben Rothlesberger, Phillip Rivers, Carson Palmer and now Matt Ryan. With the exception of Matt Ryan all of those QB's were drafted by a team that already had a lot of key components in place. Especially Big Ben and Eli. 5 QB's in the last few years worth a crap 3 of them taken in the same draft. Also on that list of 1st round picks Michael Vick, Patrick Ramsey, Joey Harrington, David Carr, Kyle Boller, Rex Grossman, Byron Leftwich, JP Losman, Jason Campbell, JaMarcus Russel, Brady Quinn and Alex Smith. If you go all the way back to 1990 you'll see maybe 3-4 more quarterbacks that really panned out to be anything taken in the first round. Manning, McNabb, McNair and Bledsooe.

Honestly with the quarterback being the most important piece of the offense I think we need the tools at hand to set that QB up for success before we start picking one at the first overall pick. We could argue that Calvin Johnson and Kevin Smith are in fact weapons and I can't really argue that but I will dispute the running game being good enough to lean on while that QB learns the NFL ropes.

We're all given the positives of how the running game "pieced together" towards the end of last season. Smith's YPC went up and so did his YPG. I say the numbers are slightly misleading. I say look at when he improved. Late in the season when he won back the starting job, when more teams, playoff contending teams, realized that they don't need to put forth much effort to beat the Lions. So the point that's not in the numbers is that those YPC and  YPG could have been "boosted" so to speak by the fact that the Lions were playing 2nd team defenses and not looking at dominant starters like they would if they were a viable threat week in and week out. Schwartz and Mayhew need to realize that almost EVERY aspect of this team is essentially broken with the exception of Calvin Johnson, and the way to make the biggest impact right away is by improving the lines. Let's hope they see that come draft day.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Pride of Detroit or its writers. FanPosts are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable fans.

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

How about Derek Anderson?

Positives-

1. Plenty of game film showing he can be a starter at the NFL level.
2. Young… His career is just starting
3. Rocket of an arm
4. Won’t cost a #1 pick
5. Could start right away
6. Cheaper than signing a #1 pick QB
7. Less risk

Someone else can point the negatives.

Here’s Killer’s article…
http://www.mlive.com/lions/index.ssf/2009/02/is_derek_anderson_a_possibilit.html

by CLF on Feb 19, 2009 10:49 AM EST reply actions  

I like it

He’s also better than any other option right now. A good but not great qb that would be a great fill-in while we build the rest of the team.

by wumanchu01 on Feb 19, 2009 12:57 PM EST reply actions  

So I read....

Where Stafford is a grad of the same Highschool as Bobby Layne…..

Here’s an ESPN Video on Stafford (sorry if it has been linked before)

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=3905701

by CLF on Feb 19, 2009 4:44 PM EST reply actions  

Draft Stafford..

and throw him to the wolves. Many great quarterbacks played for horrible teams their first year. Peyton Manning, Troy Aikman, etc. The struggled, but all showed flashes of greatness even on bad teams. As the teams then built the talent, the time and progress of the young quarterback matched the maturity of the team. I think it can sometimes be tougher on a young quarterback to produce on a team full of Super Bowl-ready veterans rather than learning along with other young players.

by DrewsLions on Feb 19, 2009 5:00 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah, he played...

well last year (that’s sarcasm in case I needed to spell it out). You think Stafford’s a risk, but want to trade picks for Anderson knowing we need all those picks in other areas?

by DrewsLions on Feb 19, 2009 9:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe...

They should take D. Anderson to the private workout with Stafford to compare :P

by CLF on Feb 20, 2009 8:04 AM EST up reply actions  

Actually, that's not...

a half bad idea. Not remotely possible, but a good idea.

by DrewsLions on Feb 20, 2009 2:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Manning

Payton threw for almost 3800 yards and 26 TD’s in his first season, and Aikman was never a great QB he was decent at best he had 1 season where he threw for more than 20 TD’s. That team was carried by an O-line and Emmit Smith, Aikman benefited from the Play-action pass and a Slant route to Michael Irvin. Stafford does not have the Aikman like tools in place nor was he as impressive as Payton Manning coming out of college.

by rmatheny on Feb 19, 2009 11:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's blog that is your source for everything Detroit Lions.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Samuraijack_small
Decision 2012: Left Tackle For The Lions
Dylan_small
The 2nd Inaugural Pride of Detroit Mock Election
Dylan_small
P.O.D. open thread #1

Recent FanPosts

Nfl-honors-show-football-b541a6888f6679d3_small
Matthew Stafford ( Alumni) QB of the year
Samuraijack_small
The 23rd Pick: A 20-Year History
Small
2012 Skill Position NFL Draft Sleepers
Small
2012 Offensive Lineman NFL Draft Sleepers
Small
A game within the game for Superbowl XLVI
Small
2012 Cap Situation & Free Agent Possibilities
Small
2012 NFL Draft Prognosticating
Small
Buying Wins Long Term
Baby_with_rat_ppm_small
Help! 5 round BPA list needed for Mocking the Draft live draft

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Pod_small Sean Yuille

Writers

Detroit-lions_small simscity

Untitled-2_small Latif Masud

41li1jpy5il Mavyrk