Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dallas Cowboys: Unknown Quantities

Lions Agree to Terms with Curry, Now Waiting on Stafford

Tom Kowalski is reporting that the Lions have agreed to contract terms with Wake Forest linebacker Aaron Curry.  A deal is in place, and now the Lions appear to be waiting for Georgia quarterback Matthew Stafford's next move.  Here is more from Kowalski:

The source said he believes that Stafford's agent, Tom Condon, will eventually agree to a deal with the Lions but probably won't do it until it gets closer to the Friday deadline. The price of the contract can only go up in the final hours so Condon will likely push the issue as far as he feels he has something to gain.

According to the story, the Lions aren't going to wait for Stafford beyond Friday.  With a deal already in place for Curry, this gives Detroit an immense amount of leverage.  That is undoubtedly part of the reason why the Lions wanted to get a deal done with Curry so quickly.  This puts the pressure on Stafford and also gives the Lions a backup plan if things don't progress with the Georgia QB.

Note that I said Aaron Curry is the Lions' backup plan in that last sentence.  That obviously hasn't been reported, but by reading between the lines, it is pretty obvious who plan A and plan B are in this situation.

Earlier today it was reported by Dave Birkett that Tom Lewand met with Lions owner William Clay Ford to get a deal with Stafford approved.  NFLDraftBible.com also reported that Ford signed off on a deal worth $40 million in guaranteed money, but we all know how little credibility that site has left.  The Lions, as expected, denied both reports, saying they are "absolutely untrue."

Kowalski basically debunked both stories as well, reporting that two sources said Lewand did not meet with Ford today.  To add on to that, ESPN's Rachel Nichols reported on SportsCenter that Martin Mayhew said negotiations with Stafford are "going well."  Nichols actually talked to Mayhew, and the Lions' GM made sure to point out that Stafford is not the Lions' only target at this point.  Even so, unless Mayhew is completely lying right now, it is evident that a deal has not been finalized just yet.

This situation could be viewed in two different ways.  The first is that the Lions want both Curry and Stafford to agree to a deal and then will make their final decision after the contracts are already worked out.  The other view is that Stafford is the Lions' top target, which is why they are waiting for him to agree to terms and are simply using Curry for negotiating purposes and as a backup plan.  It certainly seems like the latter scenario is the accurate one, as all signs point to Stafford. 

Obviously things could change if a contract isn't agreed to, but I would be surprised if it got to that point.  I guess we will find out just how bad Stafford wants to be the top pick and just how bad the Lions want Stafford.  If the money becomes an issue for either side, then Aaron Curry has a good chance of being the top pick.  As stated already, though, I would be surprised if the Lions and Stafford let that happen.  I guess we will find out for sure in the next 48 hours or so.

Comment 374 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

so we wait..

this should be a fun 48 hours.

by JCruize on Apr 22, 2009 6:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Here's my thing -

From what I’ve heard, Schwartz wants Stafford (which, admittedly doesn’t make much sense) and Mayhew wants Curry.

Today I read that they both said they will not make a decision unless both are on board… So where does that leave us? Not sure, but what it does tell me is that at the very least we have a shrewd GM. That’s one hole the Lions may not have to fill in the near term, at least.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 6:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Where?????

Where did you hear that from??

by msivits on Apr 22, 2009 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks, I read that already though

I was implying Mayhew wanted Curry and Schwartz wanting Stafford

by msivits on Apr 22, 2009 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

That seems to be the rumor

It doesn’t make sense. You would think Schwartz would be more of a defensive guy and build the team from the lines out, but who knows.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hope they don't get off on the wrong foot...

Makes no sense Schwartz would want a QB first after being under Fisher that long, or maybe Mcnair showed Schwartz the value of a franchise QB????

by msivits on Apr 22, 2009 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know

I’m just relaying what I heard. I’m jobless right now so all I do is look up NFL crap.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Me too

Sometimes I feel guilty spending time on the web when I should be spending more time looking for a job.

by James L on Apr 22, 2009 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here I am at work… looking up NFL crap…

by CLF on Apr 23, 2009 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I used to do that

Then they blocked my internet access to only work related things.

The banking industry is bunk anyways.

Drafting a quarterback first overall is like watching your mother-in-law drive over the edge of a cliff in your new Mercedes.

-Brian Billick

by Nate D. on Apr 23, 2009 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe they both really just think...

Stafford’s gonna be a good player :)

Had to get my 2 cents in…

by DrewsLions on Apr 22, 2009 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'll keep looking

I can’t recall, but it was recently that I heard that. I believe it was on the NFL network.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good question

I haven’t heard anything about Jason Smith, but maybe he is someone they could settle on.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 6:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is a great move by Mayhew

When was the last time you heard that option B was set to go before option A. Put’s all the pressure on Stafford’s side. In the end Stafford will probably sign the contract, but props to Mayhew…

by msivits on Apr 22, 2009 6:38 PM EDT reply actions  

What if...

we take Curry? How far does Stafford slip,and how much money does he lose? He would be stupid not to yake an offer

by CR on Apr 22, 2009 6:39 PM EDT reply actions  

True

But I could see Condon holding out for more money. It’s probably a matter of a few million dollars but that has been known to cause issues before.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

That...

and I could see Condon forcing the Lions at the clock to make the decision. It goes both ways. How bad do the Lions want Stafford and how much are they bluffing that they don’t want him?

Am I making sense?

by TonyDC on Apr 22, 2009 6:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

no....

you’re not making any sense. Mayhew is setting an example… he will not budge.

by CLF on Apr 22, 2009 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am saying....

I could see Condon waiting to see if the Lions really draft Curry if the Lions don’t back off the financial demands. BAsically jsut playing chicken with the Lions to see if they are bluffing.

by TonyDC on Apr 22, 2009 7:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah I could see that

Like I said in the post, we’ll find out how bad the Lions and Stafford really want each other.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Teams would DEFINITELY

trade up for Stafford, if they’ll do it for Freeman and Sanchez. On the right team, Stafford could have a great year. He wants to start immediately from what I’ve heard, and it may look more appealing to him.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 6:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Could this be?..

Political cover by the Lions. Are they being cognizant of the fact that most of the world other than Lions Fans want the Lions to draft Stafford. This way, they put the ball in Stafford’s court, and Stafford is then to blame if a deal doesn’t get done. This is just a theory, but hopefully Stafford and Condon stay greedy.

by damnitdamnitdamnit on Apr 22, 2009 6:40 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

I honestly can't

say that I believe Stafford is the choice. Basically telling Curry that he is the back up is not the message that you should be giving your #1 pick if Stafford doesn’t sign. Odd tactic if nothing else.

My guess is they lowballed Stafford and said take it or leave it for political cover as mentioned above, figuring that if he takes it good, if not, better.

by WBL on Apr 22, 2009 6:44 PM EDT reply actions  

Good point

But I’m guessing Curry was told they will make their final decision after all negotiations are done, though he probably realizes he’s not the top target. I’m sure he wouldn’t care if he ends up being the pick.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Very true

I could see the Redskin making a move for him

by CR on Apr 22, 2009 6:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah, I don't think he will drop

Like Nate said, teams are reportedly thinking of moving up to get Sanchez and Freeman. If the Lions passed on Stafford, you can bet he wouldn’t last long.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

WBL

I hope your right…Great play if so

by CR on Apr 22, 2009 6:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Redskins, Broncos, Jets, Tampa, and even Seattle (a backup for a few years) could all feasibly target QBs. Given the lack of talent at the position this year, Condon might want to see if there’s interest from teams in moving up for Stafford

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 6:47 PM EDT reply actions  

Stafford won't last long if the lions pass on him...

The Sea hawks could take him or get a great offer for him…

by msivits on Apr 22, 2009 6:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Who is the QB in St. Louis?

I am having a brain fart…would they take Stafford or at least bluff?

by TonyDC on Apr 22, 2009 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah Bulger

He’s young, just been beat up. There have been reports of them possibly taking a QB, and if Stafford is available I think that chance increases exponentially due to the fact that Bulger still has market value.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

who is injury prone and 32

Yeah, I think St. Louis would take him

by JazzyBBP on Apr 22, 2009 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bulger is 32?

Wow, time flies, I didn’t realize he was that old.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah....

that is what I thought. They could totally be in play for Stafford. If the Seahawks are in play, why not the Rams? Spags may be a D-Coordinator, but he knows the value of a god QB.

by TonyDC on Apr 22, 2009 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh for sure

Although I think with the departure of Pace, they need their comfort LT. I’d say Smith fits the Pace mold better than Monroe (although, being a VA man, I like Monroe better).

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

well...

I like what Mayhew is doing, putting on the pressure on Stafford. He clearly does want to come here and we clearly want him so lets get a deal done. I would be content with either Stafford or Curry.

by lionsfan22 on Apr 22, 2009 6:49 PM EDT reply actions  

I would imagine

Seattle would take Sanchez before Stafford.. He’s more of a quick-release, west coast guy.

I also think Carolina is a dark horse in the QB derby… they need an upgrade to Delhomme and could get Peppers out to move up and get a QB.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 6:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Peppers

has to sign a tender by Friday or he can’t be moved

by CR on Apr 22, 2009 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like Smith

Less than Stafford… the TE to LT shift worked well for Jason Peters, but I’m just not convinced Smith isn’t being overhyped.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

He might

Be overrated a little, a little bit of a workout warrior. But he’s a hard worker and he always wants to be the best. This is encouraging because you know he won’t waste his talent because he’s lazy (like Shaun Rodgers)

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cheer up

Smith is not worthy of the #1 pick…..

by FreeBradshaw on Apr 22, 2009 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

What makes you say that?

I think Jason Smith will be an elite LT

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

He may be close

but he is not Joe Thomas or Orlando Pace type good. Not even Jake Long good.

He’ll be a very good NFL starter, something that you can get potentially later in the draft.

by FreeBradshaw on Apr 22, 2009 6:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, agreed

I just don’t trust a guy to be considered as “elite” at his position if he was converted not too long ago… If I’m not mistaken, no more than 2 years ago.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's not elite

Yet. The way he works gives him an opportunity to be elite

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree

The reason I disagree with you is look at the Bills/Eagles trade for LT Jason Peters. He was a converted TE to RT and in his 3rd season he was made a LT. The two seasons he played that posisition he made the probowl.

by Usmarine0341 on Apr 22, 2009 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe

We’ll see how it plays out. he’s still a bit raw and has tremendous upside

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh definitely.

I just don’t think we have the coaching staff to coach him up to his potential. Who’s our OL coach anyhow?

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's not the same Lions staff

I’m not sure who the O-Line coach is but we know we won’t have Rod Marinelli telling him to worry less about working out and more about planting trees in the community

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Smith could

easily become Long, Pace or even Thomas the guy has a great work ethic, is probably as good pass blocker as any of them and just needs to work on improving run blocking…

by msivits on Apr 22, 2009 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

His greatest attribute is his work ethic. He will never settle with being less-than-elite as long as he’s on that field. He studied game tape of Eugene Monroe without persuasion from coaches how do you say no to that determination? It’s clear he’s not in the NFL for the money

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I've read

that the Rams actually like Monroe…

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

It might be because

Monroe is more NFL ready, they need a replacement now. They don’t have Orlando Pace anymore and if the dude can’t step in now and play like an NFL caliber LT, they’re in trouble. Smith should be able to do this, but Monroe certainly will

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Monroe

Would be a great fit here too… Pure LT, a little weak on the run blocking but a solid, solid pass blocker. Only knock is his durability.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

But with Smith's upside

You can’t pass on that. We’re not going to be good immediately so might as well sacrifice the present for the better of the future. Sure Monroe may be better immediately, but do we really need a good LT now? I would rather have him be even better later

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

not by a long shot...

I was listening to NFL Sirius on the way home and a scout said NONE of the tackles in the draft are as good as Clady(last years pick.)

by CLF on Apr 22, 2009 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Clady is very good

I remember hoping he would drop last year. Imagine him instead of Cherilus.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or ...

Brandon ALbert or Jeff Otah, both better than Cherilus in my book.

by damnitdamnitdamnit on Apr 22, 2009 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

True and true

There were a few OTs mentioned as first-rounders before the draft, and Cherilus was by far the least mentioned.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

As soon as they announced that

I about threw my remote… that was such a reach. Even Sam Baker was better than Gozder… hopefully he steps it up this year.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gos will be fine.... We even traded down so when we took him it wouldn't

be as big of a reach, remember we could of drafted Albert at 15 last year…

by msivits on Apr 22, 2009 9:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

If your #1 choice is Stafford

why the hell are you leaking that you signed Curry?

This is dumb and indecisiveness is never good.

by FreeBradshaw on Apr 22, 2009 6:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Indecisveness?

Uh, it’s pretty obvious they’re doing this to leverage Stafford into accepting their deal. It’s very smart.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bradshaw just hates Detroit

;) Wants us to fail at every turn…

Just playin bro.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 6:52 PM EDT reply actions  

good times

as rough of a season as the lions had last yr, this is a great time to be a lions fan,
it looks like we finally have a GM who knows what hes doin and a solid coach….
now its just a matter of time before the team is rebuilt

by Latif Masud on Apr 22, 2009 6:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Amen

It’s exciting, i don’t think I’ve ever been more excited for a draft before.

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 6:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know I havent

by CR on Apr 22, 2009 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mayhew

is starting to remind me (and I know it’s early so go easy) of Dumars a little. Seems like he knows how to play the games with the best of them.

by WBL on Apr 22, 2009 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just dont

Sign the Michael Curry of a coach lol. He was a great defensive player hint hint but he cant coach worth a lick

by Liontotheextreme on Apr 22, 2009 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Man

I was so damn happy when I heard we got Schwartz as our HC.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

Now the Pistons just need a Schwartz and maybe we can utilize that talent on their roster

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Give Curry Time.....

…..Hes coaching a bunch of cry babies……Next years team will be different.

by BennieBladesFan on Apr 22, 2009 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can't deny that

They already gave up on the season when Billups was traded. Sucks seeing him play so well for Denver when the Pistons have no shot of beating Cleveland.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Curry

Was put in a very difficult position. He was expecting the same old Pistons team, but then put in a different Element like AI and you lose all the previous cohesiveness. Put in a better coach and he could’ve made the AI experiment work

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I get this excited

Every year, and get let down. I just hope it changes this year.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 6:55 PM EDT reply actions  

This is great

I hear you Nate, i think we all do and Detroit has been disappointing to say the least for a number of years. BUT you cant blame Mayhew… at least yet. He has done everything right so far and as far as we can take it on an 0-16 image we had last year. Im not saying he is the best by any means but you have to agree ANYTHING is better than Millen. I know he couldnt have got that much value for Roy Williams if he tried

by Liontotheextreme on Apr 22, 2009 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Curry going 8th!!!

I read this today and it was somewhat laughable…I guess everybody is entitled to their own opinions. My opinion is that we should pull the trigger on Curry right now. Draft for the future-Draft Curry…!!

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/features/column.aspx?sport=NFL&columnid=60&articleid=32563

by mgersz on Apr 22, 2009 6:58 PM EDT reply actions  

Mayhew

has just shown some promise so far,love the Roy trade..Plenty of picks to play with, i just hope Coach was a good scout

by CR on Apr 22, 2009 6:59 PM EDT reply actions  

It don't even matter

With all the picks Mayhew has been getting (keep em coming Cowgirls!) we’re bound to hit on one of th em lol

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hopefully more than one lol

by CR on Apr 22, 2009 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's a Madhouse

I wake up up and everything has gone crazy. I’m officially happy with Mayhew and Schwartz. They’ve done an amazinf job so far, let’s hope it continues. I still think Stafford will be signed, I just think it might be for a little less than his agent had hoped for. I think being the No.1 pick means to much to him. If not, I say hooray anyway because than we get Curry, something of a win-win if you ask me.

2009 = The start of the Lions Golden Age (We hope).

by Hyperion Ecta on Apr 22, 2009 7:02 PM EDT reply actions  

THere's just one thing

The only reason I wouldn’t want to draft curry (and I know I’m going to get stabbed for this) is with the great, rangy OLB’s we have now, all our MLBs have to do is just protect the middle. He doesn’t have to roam around and make tackles, our OLBs can do that because they’re both great. Curry may be a waste of talent because he won’t have much of a responsibility.

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:04 PM EDT reply actions  

I keep hearing that

And my response is, why wouldn’t you want a guy who can do his job and more?

Once again, Peterson very likely may not be here next year. He didn’t sign an extension with us and his contract is up after this year.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Usually

It’s a foregone conclusion when you get traded to resign with your new team… for whatever reason, he opted not to.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I haven’t heard of that before, I would want to see how he plays with us for half a season before we sign him to guaranteed money…

by msivits on Apr 22, 2009 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

dosent peterson have 3 years left on his contract?

by CR on Apr 22, 2009 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know about you

But I’d be 100% OK with signing a 5 time pro bowler to an extension off the bat.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree but

isn’t Peterson 32 right now, he on his way down the hill

by msivits on Apr 22, 2009 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Better than

any of the LB’s we’ve had in the last 5 years by far.

You can’t have it all, buddy..

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

If he plays well

we can sign him to a longer contract that’s all I’m sayin…

by msivits on Apr 22, 2009 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like that way of thinking

Look at Leigh Bodden for proof of that.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I never thought highly of Leigh Bodden

Calling him “underrated” was just a way of Lions fans justifying trading arguably the best defensive player on the team

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Bodden

Like Sims, is better than he showed, and just played on a shit D.

He may not be Champ Bailey, but I’d rather have seen him and Buchanon than Buchanon and whoever.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well

What if he doesn’t have to do his job and more? I understand Peterson will be gone, but with his contract, we can get a replacement of his caliber, or even better, and we’re back in the same pickle again.

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

not necessarily

it just gives us more options. If we have a MLB who’s not just a run-stuffer but can cover a wide area, that means more stuff we can do with Sims and Peterson. We can blitz any of our LB’s and still cover over the middle well

Plus Sims and Peterson won’t be here forever (if Sims proves to undersized outside of the Tampa 2 and with Peterson getting older). I like having a young elite LB who can do everything.

by n4ry4 on Apr 22, 2009 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Plus

Think about it, Detroit (the city) LOVES this guy. He could be our Ray Lewis… the QB of the D, with the whole city behind him. Tell me that doesn’t make a player play better.

Note that I’m not comparing ability, just his presence here.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying Curry won't be great

I think he’ll be AMAZING, I’ve always loved MLBs and I would be ecstatic for Curry, but with our OLBs already better than decent. Why not just plug in a Mckillop or Brinkley to just plug the middle? We don’t need much more than that.

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

love the idea

 but Sims has been far from decent

by CR on Apr 22, 2009 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

There has been talk in forums if not the team

If we did go draft Curry, would he play middle or do we move sims to middle so curry can play outside

by Liontotheextreme on Apr 22, 2009 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sims for a second rounder

by CR on Apr 22, 2009 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

That creates a hole

That might not be real easy to fill. Sims is considered one of the best Will’s in the game.

Just doesn’t look that way when you have no one else on the D who contributes.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Definitely the Middle

The FO already confirmed this. Ernie is too small to play the Mike, and Julian is an OLB all the way.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I thnk he'll be back to form

Once he doesn’t have to make every play

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

i hope so…i have watched him over run enough plays

by CR on Apr 22, 2009 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'll quote PFW's draft guide

“Some of the best (OLB) today – Keith Bulluck, Chad Greenway and Ernie Sims – are so athletic that they get out of position overrunning plays and trying to do too much.”

…to compensate for his shitty D.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

He tries to do too much

Because he has to do everything. He knows if he misses the tackle then, everybody else on the defense is gonna miss the tackle.

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

That Makes No Sense.....

……Hes a freak…….With those 3 LBS wed have the best LB coprs in the NFC…..FERA PEOPLE…..Thats what w eneed.

by BennieBladesFan on Apr 22, 2009 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Correction

a Sims, Curry, Peterson combo would be teh best LB combo in the league, easily.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

This board is going NUTS

HAHA, well over the last 24 hours I’ve seen this one specially light up but news of the up coming draft means its crunch time. We have only 3 days till the draft and lets talk about 20, i mean we know that unless a miracle happens we are getting either Curry or Stafford, but what are we going to do on our 20

by Liontotheextreme on Apr 22, 2009 7:05 PM EDT reply actions  

If we take Stafford

We take the best MLB available @ 20 and the best OL @ 33 (Mack, Unger, IMO)

With Curry, we take DT @ 20 and OL @ 33

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

If we take Stafford

We go the Atlanta route and grab Oher (if available) at #20. If not Beatty at #33

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Get an interior O-Line

Why is everyone so obsessed that we HAVE to take a LT?

We have a HOLE at LG, and Backus is not a lock to be as good there.
Put a stud interior lineman next to him and watch him improve.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

AGREE!!!!!!

Duke or the kid from Wisconsin

by msivits on Apr 22, 2009 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

You must protect the blindside

There’s a reason it’s the most important position on the Offensive Line and why just being a LT makes you so much more valuable. If a Qb is expecting to get hit in his back every play, it makes him shaky and he’ll want to get rid of the ball quicker. It’s all mental. With Backus in a rookie Qb would get jumpy and let go of the ball waaayy too early. And what’s the point of trying to make Backus improve? It’s not like he’s young. I would rather grab a young Olineman and watch him improve

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

There will be more OTs

in the future… and since we’re obviously not taking one of the ‘elite’ guys this year, why go for a 2nd rate OT when you can get an elite IL

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would rather shore up

The most imporant aspect of football now rather than later. If our defense wasn’t so horrible I would grab Smith and then Unger or Mack and make that O-Line a strength. I can’t stress improving the trenches enough. When you break it down, football is just one big guy against another big guy. Let’s get our big guys

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm crossing everything I have

That we get Smith or Monroe. I’m for getting the O-Line early. IF we draft Stafford that’s when I’m crossing my fingers for Oher

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Because..

Jeff Backus is terrible, I don’t care if the rest of our line was from a pop warner team, Backus would still be the week link. My friends and I have a drinking game based on my TIVO and Backus’ incompetence.

by damnitdamnitdamnit on Apr 22, 2009 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

well at

least Backus serves one purpose

by JCruize on Apr 22, 2009 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lol

Does it involve false starts?

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah well

We also have Rollover… Who may be decent, but can’t guard anyone he’s so small

Especially with GB going to a 3-4, he’s gonna have a hard time handling the big nasty they take as their NT

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't like Beatty

All that much either. But you have to protect the blindside if you grab a QB, Unger and Mack, while they may help Backus out, won’t counter his mediocrity

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Disagree

He’s not terrible. Raiola is worse, Backus has had NO ONE next to him his whole career.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Beatty......

……Is a beast…..would take him at 20

by BennieBladesFan on Apr 22, 2009 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's

Servicable. If he adds strength, he goes in the top 20

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hopefully not here

Thats a reach and a half, seeing as Oher will probably be available.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

About which point?

That it’s a reach or that Oher will be available.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oher

He might have a slight chance dropping to 20, he’s to good…

by msivits on Apr 22, 2009 7:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

oher

can start at LG. Like Ogden did the learn how to play in the NFL

by JCruize on Apr 22, 2009 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Doesn't

Oher have like, football intelligence issues or something?

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

He has a learning disability

But he’s stated in interviews that it doesn’t affect his ability to learn blocking schemes

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Seriously?

Maybe that’s true, but man… That’s a rough call.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

But you know if the Lions are seriously interested, they’d be talking to coaches, friends and Oher himself ad nauseum to ensure the disability is nothing that affects his performance on the field. I’m not sure what his wonderlic is, but if it’s high, our fears are unfounded.

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oher's wonderlic score

was 19 compared to Monroe’s 24 and Smith’s 23

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

IF

IF he adds strength, he didn’t do it in time for the draft. So he goes in the 2nd rd

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

But

In the NFL if you are worried about strength that is one of the easiest thinks to fix. If he hits an NFL program he should see some great results.

by qbdoyle1 on Apr 22, 2009 7:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

at his

pro day he did 5 more reps than at the combine

by JCruize on Apr 22, 2009 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Reading all the scouting reports

It appears all of his faults are atrributed to lack of strenght, Not enough push in the run game, gets pushed back, doesn’t anchor well etc.

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

As well as I

I like Mack and Unger and even Duke Robinson. But they don’t play the most important position on the OLine.

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would feel

guilty not taking defense in the first round though

by msivits on Apr 22, 2009 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

So should Schwartz

If it comes to that… Nah, if they take QB they take MLB @ 33… mark my words.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's possible

While filling out some mocks of my own (every team not just the Lions) Oher kept falling to us on accident. It appears alot of teams in front of us have more needs than OT

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think that would be a great situation with J Laur a possibility to still be on the board at 33

by CR on Apr 22, 2009 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

That is if Stafford is the pick

by CR on Apr 22, 2009 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

If they sign stafford...

They have to get a lineman for the left side with #20 or #33…. its a wasted pick otherwise.

by CLF on Apr 22, 2009 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

but why

cant the Lions get a guard. in the second?

by JCruize on Apr 22, 2009 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I fully expect

Mack, Unger, or Wood @ 33.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

That’s why it’s good we have 3 high picks. If Stafford is drafted, one of the other two will be an OL for sure.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

You beat me to it

Had the same thoughts just a second after you

by qbdoyle1 on Apr 22, 2009 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

if we get

stafford. We still need a MLB.

by JCruize on Apr 22, 2009 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Maualuga is available at 20, I would take him and wait on an OL

If he’s not, get an OL and hope James Laurinaitis falls.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Laurinitis @ 20

That’s my guess.

San Diego is going to take their next Junior Seau.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

MLB

Is pretty deep in the 3rd rd. With guys like Mckillop and Jasper Brinkley (a favorite of mine) being available. If we don’t draft MLB in #20 or #33 the options are still plentiful

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah more I read on Brinkley I like him too

His weight concerns me a little. But he is a true thumper…

by msivits on Apr 22, 2009 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Brinkley

You have to look for contributors deep in the draft, true, but I just find fault with filling a roster spot that is currently empty with a late round talent, especially at such a pivotal position.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed

But kid was great before he hurt his knee, it takes a year to come back from serious knees surgery he had… Could be a steal if we take him late and he is healthy…

by msivits on Apr 22, 2009 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

True, true

I guess I just assume we could never find a gem late in the draft.

This is what years of draft conditioning will do to you..

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't follow college FB that close

I heard D. Beckwith is worth a look as well.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

You can learn wonders

From mocking sites (draftcountdown.com is my personal preference) I saw some film of Brinkley in the 2008 season and he wasn’t very impressive because of his knee injury. But after his great combine numbers its clear he is back to 100% and he was good before that injury of his. I just hope it isn’t lingering

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great pick

I did not want any offense in the first round but if we are going to get Stafford then I think we need to go OT to protect him. Oher would be a great pick.

by qbdoyle1 on Apr 22, 2009 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

OT

Barely counts as Offense. It’s been a weakness of ours as long as I can remember

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I understand your point

but how can you say that an OT is not on offense. I want all defense but since Stafford probably be the pick we have to protect him. As you said this has been our weakness for a long time and we cant afford to have our new golden boy on his back all day.

by qbdoyle1 on Apr 22, 2009 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

His point

If I got it right, is that that’s such a position of need that it transcends the Offense/Defense argument.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

Nate D hit it on the head. I know that was a bit of a cryptic comment lol

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can see that

I just want to make sure that if in fact it is Stafford we have to protect him. Either with #20 or #33 we have to get something now.

by qbdoyle1 on Apr 22, 2009 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lions Will Trade.....

….out of 20 and pick up NE 3 2nd rounders……..Especially if Clay Matthews is there or another LB that Billicheck likes.

by BennieBladesFan on Apr 22, 2009 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

NE will take

Connor Barwin as their next OLB because he can play TE as well

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

That would be

A great move if Maualuga and Oher didn’t drop (assuming we need those positions) I’m also slowly falling in love with Vontae Davis (no homo) his athleticism has to outweigh possible attitude problems

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

At DB

I really, really like Sean Smith. He’s huge, and can play safety as well.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like Smith

As well, but in terms of talent, he’s not as good as Vontae Davis by any means. Davis is top 15 if cornerback was more of a need for teams and if he didnt clash with coaches and other players in his past.

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

He goes

…to New Orleans I think

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Depends

If Malcolm Jenkins falls to NO, they’d pick him up in a heartbeat. He’s a perfect fit

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 8:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jenkins

Is top 10. Mangini is probably going to take him after the Crabtree debocle. My biggest question mark is where does Crabtree go? I say the Jags, as Oaktown seems to be after Maclin.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 8:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

NFL NETWORK>...

Just confirmed this report… live on tv.

by CLF on Apr 22, 2009 7:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Atmosphere

It certainly seems the Lions Brass has created the prefect storm in order for them to get the best possible deal…

And Hypothetically if we don’t take Stafford and he slips out of the top 4… does this create a situation where Sanchez or him fall to 13-19 or do they both go between 8-13?

by Goose21 on Apr 22, 2009 7:08 PM EDT reply actions  

they will both be gone

by CR on Apr 22, 2009 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

I don’t expect any QBs to all when the drop off is so big after Stafford, Sanchez, and Freeman.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

No way we grab a QB later unless Sanchez drops further than freeman, and I don’t think I want Sanchez.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Sanchez will be...

GONE, out of here lol, no way does he get past the 49ers at 10, no way. First you have Us, Seattle, all the way down to 49ers at 10, they’ll jump on sanchez quicker than an airplane

by Liontotheextreme on Apr 22, 2009 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't forget Denver

They worked him out yesterday I think. Sanchez will probably be gone before the Broncos’ first pick, but if he isn’t I think Denver might take him.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think the

broncos will go all defense in the first

by JCruize on Apr 22, 2009 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I see Denver

Picking up B.J Raji if he falls. They need a beast like that on the line

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think he will

I have Raji to Denver… heard today that Jacksonville isn’t very high on him, and he fits better as a 3-4 DT.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think

They’ve got bigger needs @ LB with the 3-4 change. They’ll take Tyson Jackson over Raji, trust me. He’s been flying up the boards.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Really?

Thats who I picked for GB in the POD mock draft. Most didn’t agree with me

by JazzyBBP on Apr 22, 2009 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

As did I

I researched the SHIT out of my mock, and I bet it does well :D

They need a 3-4 DE due to Kampman getting kicked out to OLB… Jackson is a stud. Only problem is if he goes earlier to KC or Cleveland

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sanchez.....

…..will be the better pro in my mind…..SO ID RATHER HAVE HIM!!!

by BennieBladesFan on Apr 22, 2009 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Doesn't fit our scheme

We need a QB with a big arm to fit Linehan’s vertical passing scheme. Daunte is actually a great fit.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't...

Stafford had the more difficult offense…. Sanchez is going to be more of a system QB.

by CLF on Apr 22, 2009 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

USC

Is a pro offense. How does that make him a system QB?

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

use

Stafford had a harder timein his offense doesn’t mean it was more complicated

by ATL Lion on Apr 22, 2009 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

USC

Uses more of a system, west coast offense. UGA uses a pro style. They’re both pro style O’s but USC also plays in one of the weakest divisions in the NCAA Div-I

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

i'm confused

isnt the west coast offense one of the most popular offenses in the NFL. How can it not be a “pro style offense?”

by WBL on Apr 22, 2009 10:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

As I said

The west coast is a pro-style offense. It, however, is a system offense, meaning players need specific measurables and abilities to fit into it. Georgia plays a more open playbook against better competition, so Stafford gets the nod, most of the time.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yup

Joey came from a pro-style, and the Lions tried to make him a west coast QB. Didn’t work out to well. Gotta have the right QB for it

by JazzyBBP on Apr 22, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

i know.

i was just being a dick. sorry.

by WBL on Apr 22, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hahaha

No prob, thanks for apologizing ;)

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not convinced

That San Fran is going to go QB. They like Shaun Hill, and want to give their #1 overall one more year. There’s a wellspring of their type of QBs next year. Gotta think long term.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:16 PM EDT reply actions  

I cant even keep up with this post

I have no idea what anyone is even posting now this is great. Look what you created Sean. Nice job.

by qbdoyle1 on Apr 22, 2009 7:17 PM EDT reply actions  

It's a monster, lol

Even I am more addicted to it than I used to be, and it’s my site. Haha

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

And the

Lion Nation comes alive!!!!!

by JCruize on Apr 22, 2009 7:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Love the maddness

by CR on Apr 22, 2009 7:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Sean

P.S. there’s over 200 comments in the past 20 min, this is the biggest chat I’ve ever seen here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by msivits on Apr 22, 2009 7:32 PM EDT reply actions  

If this is big, wait until the draft

I’m going to have to create so many overflow threads. It’s gonna be nuts.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ugh

Don’t mention the draft I can hardly wait!

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

And I can't wait to see what it's like this season

Game days will be lively, that’s for sure.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Finally

I can complain to someone other than my cat when teh Lions do a 2 yard pass on 3rd and 5

by ATL Lion on Apr 22, 2009 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

lol

leave mr. cuddles alone

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mr. cuddles

has been more accurate with his mock draft than Mel kiper

by ATL Lion on Apr 22, 2009 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

But does he have a hairpiece?

And can he speak over everyone else all the time?

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's not that bad

And if we neuter Mel, he won’t be either

by ATL Lion on Apr 22, 2009 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have such a hard time

even watching the debates between him and McShay… I used to like McShay, then I realized they’re just playing off each other for ratings. He’s better than Kiper, but that’s not saying much. It’s like two feuding brothers.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

ESPN

Plays this McShay-Kiper rivalry for ratings. Their nothing more than actors in my eyes.

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rec'd

That is great.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not as good as...

Michael Smiths comment on the Lions….

“They went defeated last year.”

by CLF on Apr 22, 2009 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like the

comment. Some how it makes it less painful

by JCruize on Apr 22, 2009 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I love it

Gives me something to do.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:33 PM EDT reply actions  

Im new to this site and its been great already…cant wait for the season

by CR on Apr 22, 2009 7:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Stupid ?

But since everyone seems to be on this thread I figure you guys will know.

Does the draft start at 4pm ET? If it does, is it my bad memory or does the draft usually start much earlier?

by ATL Lion on Apr 22, 2009 7:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes

It’s moving towards primetime. Last year it was 3 as compared to the normal noon start time. NFL’s goal is to move it to primetime eventually. Probably in a few years the first-round will be on Friday night.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

thatd be great

im an orthodox jew who cant use electricity on saturdays (its the sabbath) and every damn year i get so anxious waiting for the sabbath to end so I can see who the next great Lions hope is. If they move it to friday night, ill just get the paper the next day

"Sometimes Joe (morgan) doesn't like facts to get in the way of his opinions."- billy beane
"That was a great pick...if this was 2002" Me, to guy who selected Barry Zito in a fantasy draft
www.27ClubPeak.blogspot.com

by harendaman365 on Apr 23, 2009 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

You're correct

It’s usually at 12, but for some reason they bumped it up. No idea why.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:41 PM EDT reply actions  

yes 4 PM

I am guessing they moved it later in the day to get it more in prime time. They are trying to make the NFL draft as big as anything else on TV. That is my guess, strictly ratings.

by qbdoyle1 on Apr 22, 2009 7:42 PM EDT reply actions  

That is correct

Like I said, it is inevitable that the draft will be primetime. More of a matter of how long until it happens rather than if it will.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bah

If they move it to primetime I lose my excuse to drink all day watching too much TV. I hated when they moved the 3rd round off of day 1.

by ATL Lion on Apr 22, 2009 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah the coverage this year has been amazing

It seems that no matter what station you listen to it is about the draft. I can’t believe how big this draft has gotten. It’s great and it will be a huge money maker for the networks. My guess is within 2 or 3 years its going to ABC

by qbdoyle1 on Apr 22, 2009 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

ESPN wouldn't do that

They’re moving the BCS to ESPN, so they would definitely want to keep the draft.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dont you think they might get more veiwers

if they were not on ESPN. They should buy the exclusive rights to the draft and show it on their affiliate ABC. I don’t know ratings that much but I wonder if they can draw in the average fan on a major network at least for a little while. the NFL is getting so big and popular it is amazing

by qbdoyle1 on Apr 22, 2009 7:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know if it would be that big of a difference

If MNF were still on ABC it would be a possibility, but the NFL has no ties to ABC anymore.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good point

I keep forgetting that they moved MNF

by qbdoyle1 on Apr 22, 2009 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I dont know

If you live in or around Detroit, but it’s insane here… Valenti and Foster were begging listeners to talk about the Wings, hahaha.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't doubt it

I don’t listen to their show because I despise Valenti, but from what I hear they focus on the Lions more than any other Detroit team.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

You too?

Yeah, HATE Valenti, although today, ironically, I sent in my opinion on our 1st and 2nd rounders and they recommended me for GM :)

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks

I’ll make sure and put that on my resume submission ;)

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

That'd be funny

Additional Comments: Strongly considered for the position of Lions GM

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Wings can have the rest of the spring.

Let the Lions have their weekend. Besides what’s to talk about? The Columbus series? Seriously?

by WBL on Apr 22, 2009 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hopefully they sweep them so there's no game on Saturday

I would like to not have multiple TVs running.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I get to watch

none of the above. I have a presentation on Tuesday for a class. No time for the Lion’s SuperBowl or the Wings this weekend. Bums me out.

by WBL on Apr 23, 2009 2:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

I got two finals on Monday but will still be watching every second of the draft. It’s not something that you need to full pay attention to except for bout every 12 minutes, its the perfect thing to study to.

by Curse of Bobby Layne 50 Years Strong on Apr 23, 2009 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hopefully

The 1st round will be shorter than last year’s.

I’ve made it a ritual to watch the draft for the last 5 years or so… It’s bigger than the SB most of the time… minus the last two SB’s which were amazing

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:44 PM EDT reply actions  

This is our Super Bowl

Last year’s first-round was only 3 and a half hours since they shortened the allotted time for first-round picks. I remember 2007, though. That was the longest first-round in history. I live-blogged the entire first day of the draft, too. It went from like 12 to 11 or something ridiculous like that.

Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's Lions Blog

by Sean Yuille on Apr 22, 2009 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's the one

Longest 1st round ever.. I never blogged or anything, just got jacked up and watched it, and I was laughing so hard at Berman and Co. get so irritated with each other by the end of it.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

well face it

it is almost a Super Bowl for Lions fans.

by JCruize on Apr 22, 2009 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I refer to it as "The Lion's Super Bowl"

Just so my wife understands why I want to watch it.

by ATL Lion on Apr 22, 2009 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

Our opponents are the 19 teams between pick 1 and pick 20 gotta love our odds

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hahaha

So proud of my Leo’s sniff look at us now, growing up so fast..

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 7:48 PM EDT reply actions  

I've decided....

That I will be happy whether we draft Curry OR Stafford. Both have tremendous promise and both would fit our growing team very well. This is a total win-win situation.

Also, I think Mayhew is playing this brilliantly. I think they could go with either player as well, and signing Curry before Stafford allows them leverage in getting a better deal. They really can’t lose with this tactic.

by AZ Yooper on Apr 22, 2009 7:58 PM EDT reply actions  

I go back and forth

But ultimately, I totally agree. No matter the outcome I will welcome our #1 with open arms (just maybe not QUITE as open…). If anything, this has been a lesson in actually believing in your FO.

Kudos, Mr. Mayhew. Please hand me my Kool-Aid.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

To me

I won’t be thoroughly dissapointed with any player chosen with the #1 (unless Crabtree’s name comes up) I’m not saying every player is a sure thing, but with every positiion being a need, it’d be very hard for the Lions to commit a stupid pick here.

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 8:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I cant believe I am going to say this but...

I think the Lions have done something right, Mayhew!! What he has done under the pressure of Detroit has really been impressive. No one wanted him as the GM and all he does is continue to impress. I know every one of his moves have been judged and looked at and I think he has done a very good job. So as it stands on this day, April 22, I actually approve of the direction this team is going under Meyhew. Man, it feels wierd to say the Lions got something right!!

by qbdoyle1 on Apr 22, 2009 8:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed

Alot of turnarounds from horrible teams lately (ATL, Miami) but this might be the biggest one of all, Parcells has some competion

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well..

I’m optimistic, but you might want to pull back on the reins a bit. 95% of what we see is dependant on this draft.

Mayhew might be a shrewd negotiator, but our scouting department, (IMO) is still suspect.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who knows

but I can at least I can be optimistic as of right now. Seeing that I have been a Lions fan all my life I know that optimism can be shut down very quickly. As quickly as a Matt Ryan TD pass on the 3rd (or so) play of the season.

by qbdoyle1 on Apr 22, 2009 8:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

If that doesn work

How about 3 TD’s by ATL in the opening quarter. that was also crushing

by qbdoyle1 on Apr 22, 2009 8:10 PM EDT reply actions  

I believe

That Michael Turner’s first or 2nd run on the Falcons was a TD as well.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 8:14 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah

Halfway through typing a comment I’d have 20 more that I wanted to respong too lol

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

On Yahoo's front NFL page

It has a link to a article about our #1 that has the title of “Wise Guys”.

When was the last time you saw the words “Detroit Lions” and “Wise” put together?

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 8:48 PM EDT reply actions  

I go

to my church’s Wednesday night thing and when I get home I find this post with 300 comments already. I read what I could but I’ve got to move on.

by James L on Apr 22, 2009 9:00 PM EDT reply actions  

DId you know?

Stafford went to the same high school as Bobby Layne? That’s bad karma man

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 9:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Also

He uses the same name system as Joey Harrington

Real names:

John Joseph Harrington
John Matthew Stafford

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 9:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow

I forgot about that

What’s next? Is his dad Andre Ware?

by detpistons3 on Apr 22, 2009 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes and his secret man lover is Mel KIper

by Curse of Bobby Layne 50 Years Strong on Apr 22, 2009 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

secret?

"Sometimes Joe (morgan) doesn't like facts to get in the way of his opinions."- billy beane
"That was a great pick...if this was 2002" Me, to guy who selected Barry Zito in a fantasy draft
www.27ClubPeak.blogspot.com

by harendaman365 on Apr 23, 2009 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

thats good karma

someones got to break the curse

by kevough on Apr 22, 2009 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

On the Contrary

I think it’ll renew it! :P

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why is that bad karma?

Sounds like providence to me. The last Lions championship came from that school…

by DrewsLions on Apr 22, 2009 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Isn’t the curse suppose to be over this year, as he said they wouldn’t win for the next 50 years.

by Curse of Bobby Layne 50 Years Strong on Apr 22, 2009 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I know

I just don’t trust that Bobby didn’t send John to come ruin our party for another few years…. ;)

All of this is very tounge-in-cheek, though, I don’t believe in superstitions. Just weird facts.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

At this point

i can care less who we draft,lets just get this show on the road!!!

by zeke313 on Apr 22, 2009 9:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Another thing to think about

If Stafford and Bobby Lane went to the same high school, and if Stafford is to be anywhere near Lane in effectiveness, I hope Stafford can drink a lot of beer. Cause he is going to have to be a beer drinking brawling dude to come close to Bobby Lane! Really disappointing to even think that the Lions could waste a draft pick on Offense in the first round…the best Lions teams have been good because of their defense…of course “their best” is certainly relative!!!

by ftblphan on Apr 22, 2009 9:48 PM EDT reply actions  

I like that article

But it doesn’t give much in the way of filler…He doesn’t back up his argument much.

With that said, I never though about the teams (Chicago, Tampa) who never get their QB. Chicago hits closer to home, being in our division, but once again, what does it matter if we get 35 points a game if we’re giving up 52?

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Please Draft Curry..!

I’m just not sold on Stafford as a “franchise” QB. I’d draft Curry, save some $$ and go after Pat White in the 2nd or 3rd round. You can quote me today – Stafford will not be worth the value of a 1st round pick.

by Drumset on Apr 22, 2009 10:02 PM EDT reply actions  

And Curry is not

worth the 1st overall pick either.

Pat White is a waste of time too.

by FreeBradshaw on Apr 22, 2009 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

But Curry is the consensus "safest" pick

look at the Lions roster, my fellow skeptic dude. How many players are on it from the 02-06 drafts? (five drafts, over 30 picks) 2-Sims and Bullocks
I, as many other fans, want safe picks
just sayin’

by JazzyBBP on Apr 22, 2009 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nice article, North

I have to say that I agree with most of it. I sometimes don’t care for the “history as an indicator” thing, because each player is an individual and there are just so many variables to a player succeeding or not. Sometimes it’s surroundings and really not much to do with the player at all. But the overall concept displayed here is pretty sound… in my humble opinion, anyway.

by DrewsLions on Apr 22, 2009 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree Drew

That is my philosophy with people in general. Everyone has strengths and weaknesses in whatever they do, the key is to put people into situations where their strengths can be utilized and their weaknesses can be somewhat covered up. That doesn’t mean you don’t try and work on the person’s weaknesses either.

I think the best coaches in the NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, [wherever] do that all the time. The worst coaches try to apply a system, irregardless of the players on hand and available.
 You always hear about players who failed with other teams turning their careers around with another. I think most of the time it is because of finding the right situation, not because of some great personal improvement by the player.

Look at Dennis Rodman. The guy did not fit the mold of pretty well any NBA player. But with the Pistons he got to show exactly what he could do.

If they do draft Stafford, I hope the Lions coaches are good enough to smooth out the rough spots and use him in a way that he can succeed.

by NorthLeft12 on Apr 23, 2009 5:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, it does come down to...

faith in the front office and coaching staff. Last year, we were overmatched in both departments. I think this could be the strongest staff in a long time. That being said, they haven’t proven anything on the field yet. It’s a reputation thing right now.

by DrewsLions on Apr 23, 2009 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

go stafford

line backer dont rule fransice

by kevough on Apr 22, 2009 10:42 PM EDT reply actions  

I think

Ray Lewis, Lawrence Taylor, and Mike Singletary might beg to differ.

by WBL on Apr 22, 2009 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

whats a fransice

when making idiotic points, please try to at least spell correctly

"Sometimes Joe (morgan) doesn't like facts to get in the way of his opinions."- billy beane
"That was a great pick...if this was 2002" Me, to guy who selected Barry Zito in a fantasy draft
www.27ClubPeak.blogspot.com

by harendaman365 on Apr 23, 2009 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

I will be so sick if Detroit takes Stafford. Really, you have to be joking with me. Detroit gave up 31+ points 10 games last year. How does Stafford help that sitting on the bench? Detroit also needs a Left Tackle. All the good tackles will be gone by 20. If you take Stafford at 1 and a Tackle at 20 how does this help your defense? I drive to Detroit every year to see 1 or 2 games. If Detroit takes Stafford I will not support their team. Stafford has done NOTHING to deserve that kind of money. HE WILL BE A BUST! Draft Curry, keep your fans happy.

by daredevil9 on Apr 22, 2009 11:17 PM EDT reply actions  

Detroit can't draft scared

I’m sure Mayhew did the work on Stafford, if he was scared of him not being the guy they would take someone else, money only stands in the way…

by msivits on Apr 22, 2009 11:20 PM EDT reply actions  

The FO

has said they won’t draft anyone unless Mayhew and Schwartz are in agreement. At this point its all smoke and mirrors. They could secretly be taking Jason Smith for all we know.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Mayhew might want Curry and Schwartz might want Stafford but I don’t think there at teeth and nails about it right now. Smith is something they both could agree on and not be sore over…

by msivits on Apr 22, 2009 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was just making an example

I highly doubt smith is even part of the equation anymore, as Condon represents both Smith and Stafford… working against yourself is not good business, especially when your reputation is at stake.

by Nate D. on Apr 22, 2009 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

In reality Smith is best option

Smith would be the best choice. With only 3-4 starting Left Tackles in this draft and that being Detroit #1 need, it would be the best pick. Then go Defense at 20 and 33.

by daredevil9 on Apr 22, 2009 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's blog that is your source for everything Detroit Lions.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Samuraijack_small
The 23rd Pick: A 20-Year History
Samuraijack_small
Decision 2012: Left Tackle For The Lions
Dylan_small
The 2nd Inaugural Pride of Detroit Mock Election

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Pod_small Sean Yuille

Writers

Detroit-lions_small simscity

Untitled-2_small Latif Masud

41li1jpy5il Mavyrk