2009-2010 Lions Schemes
...And how our draft picks fit into them.
I have to admit: during the draft yesterday, I was flabbergasted. I saw multiple opportunities for the Lions to improve huge roster holes immensely and they totally whiffed on them. However, after doing some research (including digging through my brain for forgotten information), I have determined that our draft picks by and large, were the right decision.
Pick No. 1 (No. 1 overall): John Matthew Stafford, QB, Georgia
For the 7th out of the past 9 years, a quarterback is selected #1 overall. Matt Stafford is what scouts and coaches call a "prototypical quarterback"; a QB with great size and build. He can do anything a coach will ask him to do in some measure, including the ability to run with his mobility in the pocket.
In Scott Linehan's system, the quarterback is a guy who can heave the ball deep. The running game is a focal point. By drawing safties into the box and forcing corners to bump in order to provide run support, the QB must have an arm to throw the deep ball (think Peyton Manning to Marvin Harrison). The QB must be able to make the big play when the defense is not looking. He must be the undisputed leader of the team; confident and full of moxy. Accuracy should be best with the short passing game, where the quarterback will have to thread the ball on slant and drag routes to keep the defense honest.
As much as I hate to admit it, Stafford was a perfect pick here. Better (as of now) than Sanchez, Freeman, Bradford, McCoy, or any of the other QBs would be for our system. He can do all the things I've mentioned, and potentially more under a former HC and accomplished OC who specializes in QBs.
Pick No. 2 (20th overall) Brandon Pettigrew, TE, Oklahoma State
Pettigrew was the undisputed top prospect at tight end in this year's draft. He is a complete package, even if he's a little old school: he excels in the blocking game, using his massive frame to push around linebackers and even defensive ends with ease. Has good hands, although they were underutilized in Oklahoma State's scheme.
Our offensive scheme, as I mentioned before, will be centered on a power running game coupled with a deep threat passing scheme. Pettigrew should fit this mold and be with us for a good long while. His blocking abilities are undoubtedly what he was drafted for. He will be on the field for many plays, as Linehan prefers to use a Strong-I or two tight end set. The tight end is an integral part of his scheme, allowing for an extra blocker in the run game, and a safety valve for the QB on passing downs if his outside threats are covered.
Once again, a perfect fit. A stronger blocker than reciever, although great at both. Pettigrew is going to double as both an extra lineman and reciever every down. He can seal the edge for Kevin Smith to run through, or leak out and run a route to capitalize on Calvin Johnson's ability to draw double coverage.
Pick No. 3 (33rd overall) Louis Delmas, S, Western Michigan
Louis Delmas has been described as many things, most of them involving some sort of weapon. The phrases "torpedo", "heat seeking missile", and "kamikaze" are commonplace in reference to him. He is a stout run defender with good speed and a nose for the ball. A little undersized, Delmas counteracts his physical deficiencies with a tenacity that coaches salivate over. He is somewhat suspect in pass coverage, with concerns about his intelligence coming forward after he scored a 12 on the Wonderlic test. Ultimately, his passion for the game and similarities drawn to Ed Reed brought him to the forefront as the top prospect in his position.
Now we come to the defensive side of the ball. I was HUGELY disappointed by this pick initially, as I believed this was our chance to get the quarterback of our defense in either Rey Maualuga or James Laurinitis. Lucky for me, I was incorrect. We did get our quarterback.
In Gunther Cunningham's defensive system, we will be running a 4-3 defense similar to the Tampa-2 we ran last year. The major difference between the two schemes is the switch to man coverage from primarily zone. Our players will be accountable for their men, and with our front seven being used mostly to attack the quarterback, our defensive backs have to be able to stay with the reciever.
Gunther is an ex-defensive backs coach. In his scheme, he uses a safety as most other schemes use a middle linebacker or inside linebacker. Delmas will be the main playcaller, and the one to recognize changes in the offensive set. With a good vantage point of the field, he will be capable of audibiling the defense in order to prevent the defense from taking advantage of our plays, and also serve as the captain of the defense.
I didn't think so at first, and I am still skeptical, but I think this was a great pick. We got our Mike, guys. He's just not in the position we thought he'd be. I was under the impression that our middle linebacker would be the Urlacher or Ray Lewis of our D. Instead, Delmas will hopefully serve as our Bob Sanders, and since our defensive coordinator is an ex-defensive backs coach, I'd say we better served our team to develop a potential all-pro in our back four. Go figure, a Detroit Lions team with a good secondary?
All told, I'm still confused about the rest of the draft (including these picks) but I can see a method to the madness. Chin up boys, we just took steps to build quite a dynamic team. Think power running, deep ball throwing, run stopping, smashmouth football. I don't know about you, but I'm starting to like it.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Pride of Detroit or its writers. FanPosts are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable fans.
44 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Charley Casserly was talking on NFL network
That Stafford rated higher than Bradford, maybe they chose a QB and his TE this year and want to stock up on Defense next year when there is more dynamic players coming out?
When angry, count four; when very angry, swear. ~Mark Twain, Pudd'nhead Wilson, 1894
That's what I'm thinking
Ultimately they did what I wanted them to do – Established their leaders on offense and defense first thing, grabbed a weapon for Staff (everyone saw that coming) and then fleshed out the roster for the rest of the draft.
I will give it an initial grade of B-, with a B+ if the first 3 picks all pan out.
Nice Post
Very interesting stuff Nate D. I knew Stafford’s skill set was a good fit with Linehan, but it was interesting to read how Pettigrew and Delmas also seem like quality fits with the type of schemes we are running.
Can Delmas overcome his lack of pure intelligence?
“Delmas will be the main playcaller, and the one to recognize changes in the offensive set. With a good vantage point of the field, he will be capable of audibiling the defense in order to prevent the defense (I think you meant offense here) from taking advantage of our plays, and also serve as the captain of the defense”.
That sounds great Nate (no rhyme intended). My concern is the fact that he scored a 12 on the wonderlic, among other facts including his level of competition coming out of WMU. I sincerely hope that he plays as well as Scheffler and Jennings, but I am worried that he will struggle not only with reading offensive schemes at the pro level, but also with understanding our defensive system, being able to properly call plays and audible into the right plays to counteract offensive schemes, the speed difference between the MAC and the NFL, and NFL quality competition. I HOPE that he is as good as Bob Sanders or Ed Reed, because that would be awesome for our team, but I have my doubts and will take the wait and see approach.
Absolutely
I’m by no means saying that Delmas is a lock – much to the contrary, I think he’s the scariest player in our draft.
This is how I (optimistically) see Delmas: He’s Gun’s toy. Gun is going to coach the shit out of this kid, to set the tone for our D. Our coaching staff hasn’t done anything yet, so I can’t say it’s not going to happen. I can speculate on how they use him, and football intelligence IS something that can be taught, luckily.
I can't wait for the New Orleans game.
Will the Saint’s recievers start short arming the ball after Delmas lays the lumber a few times? Will the Safety Blitz knock Drew on his @$$ ? If the wins are going to be minimal I would at least like to see a little bit of BAM! take that out of our defense!
by Runnin' Rebel on Apr 27, 2009 5:00 PM EDT reply actions
Well done Nate
I think Schwartz is a smart guy and he picked guys who’s gonna fit our team. Marinelli did something similar, although he just picked guys with good character. That doesn’t always work. I have lots of faith in our team. I’’m virtually swimming in Kool-Aid!
2009 = The start of the Lions Golden Age (We hope).
Good Stuff
Rec’d. Provides perspective on why the Lions made the picks that they did. Maybe the Lions drafted thier biggest needs after all.
I think everyone heard me
With all the talk I had about how much I disliked drafting all 3 of these guys… Once you look at the big picture, it starts to make sense: In a talent-starved draft, our coaching staff and FO picked up the few guys that were head and shoulders above their competition. Couple that with those guys being in positions where our coaches will really know how to utilize them and coach them naturally, and you could see a few real studs coming out of the draft.
We’re basically getting the framework together for the house. Through the offseason this year and next year we’ll pour the mortar and move in (hopefully).
I really hope we get Larry Foote. I was hoping we’d trade for him right after the Super Bowl, but now that he’s come to the forefront in wanting to come here, the FO better get on their game and bring this guy over here.
by Nate D. on Apr 28, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Nice post!
I hope your right . I still dont like Staff as a 1st overall. We need a OL, a DL, and depth at LB. thats what I see. But you shed light on what they MIGHT be doing.
Thanks for the post
I have just been coming around to accepting this draft as part of a plan. Foote helps.
I still have some trouble with some of the middle rounds, but I will give them a lot more rope if they end up with a good MLB.
delmas
I don’t know how you could say safety was not a weakness when the entire seconday only had 1 interseption. Look at the numbers of opposing quarterbacks and it was not pretty. Can we say playing catch. laugh. I had no problem with the pick if he performs.
What I meant
Was that safety was less of a weakness than, say, Mike or OL. We have 3 capable safeties in Alexander, Bullocks, and the venerable Anthony Henry. We could have easily started two of those and drafted an MLB or other position, which, at the time baffled me. We’ve shored up the defensive backfield with two relatively big acquisitions in the offseason, and I saw other positions that could be of greater benefit during the draft.
I did not, however, recognize the emphasis Gun put on the S being the eyes of the team however, and like I said, you factor in his experience as a DB coach, and it really makes sense. I wouldn’t want a DB coach trying to groom our defensive leader in a position he isn’t as familiar with.
I Don't Know About Our 'Power Running Game'
The Lions had one of the worst running games in the league last year by any measure, and did not add much to improve it. Loper and Morris is all I know about. Our RBs are not power guys at all. They are finesse slashers. If you want a power game you better have at least three runners and a bigger line.
We will see.
I wasn't referring to where we're at now...
…but what we’re heading towards:
Chin up boys, we just took steps to build quite a dynamic team.
And to say that Kevin Smith is not a power runner… he makes his cuts, but it’s one cut and he goes down the field. He lacks top-end speed, and uses his solid size for an RB (6’1", 211 lbs.) as an advantage to run through defenders. Morris is a nice slasher compliment, but as I said, I was referring more to the scheme they plan on putting in place. Neither Linehan nor Schwartz drafted many of these guys, and they will be working with them to create the scheme they want. Don’t be suprised if Smith puts on a few pounds this season or next.
I can't remember ever seeing K-Smooth....
break into the open where he could showcase his top end speed…..can anyone think of an example where he was in the clear and was caught from behind?
I remember him making a couple of breaks
There was the 12-10 game against the Vikings where he cut a 50yd run. He didn’t really hit top gear but he didn’t really blaze either. A DB made the tackle after Smith was corralled toward the sideline.
2009 = The start of the Lions Golden Age (We hope).
by Hyperion Ecta on Apr 29, 2009 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions
So they got they angle on him
But he did not explode up the middle and get caught from behind….I think he is much faster than he gets credit for. That is all I was saying.
Nah
We haven’t reallly seen him in a true footrace yet, and I agree, I think he’s get some fleet feet.
2009 = The start of the Lions Golden Age (We hope).
by Hyperion Ecta on Apr 30, 2009 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions
K Smith
I think that Smith had a WAY better year than anyone gives hm credit for…a couple yards shy of a thousand, without having started all season; give some credit where it’s due. This young man is an animal and every bit as good as any of the other rookies he came out with despite how the league’s commentators have overlooked him…so far. Considerring the fact that we regularly played from a very significant point differential all season – and, thus, could hardly afford to truely exercise our running game – one might even consider his performance last year to have been SUPERIOR to those of his peers.. I definitely mean to include one FORTE (and quite unfairly, I freely admit) who will fail to repeat his rookie success in the upcoming future despite an impressive upgrade in the Bears Oline
Agreed!
I remember being at one of the preseason games last year, watching Kevin for (one of the) first times… He’s going to be a stud in this league. I think he can afford to put some weight on and start really manhandling some LB’s and DB’s. Can’t wait to see what Linehan has schemed for him and Maurice Morris.
Not to mention the underheralded addition of Terrelle Smith, a great FB in his own right.
Agreed
K-Smooth was very impressive last year. Too bad we tried to use Rudi Johnson a little too much early on though. Smith has got great vision and doesn’t go down easy. Hopefully we’ll see a 1000+ yard season from him this year.
2009 = The start of the Lions Golden Age (We hope).
by Hyperion Ecta on Apr 29, 2009 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions
How sad is it...
…that most NFL fans are hoping their team can win the division, make a run and dare I say it…make the Super Bowl. Lions fans are keeping their fingers crossed for a running back having a 1000yd season! Here’s hoping for a two interception season from our defensive backs!!!
I didn't think any questioned their talent...
It seems to me, that what most people who were upset about the draft (including myself), were upset about which players were picked when others were available. I think Pettigrew is a solid NFL caliber TE (as he should be with a 1st round pick), but when defensive tackle, offensive guard, and middle linebacker were such glaring needs it just doesn’t make much sense. I love the fact that he’s a blocking tight end, and it would be great to get a power running game going. That being said, it is extremely difficult to commit to a running game when you are down by 21pts at the end of the first quarter in almost every game. As far as Delmas goes…at least he was a defensive player, and yes, as bad as this defense was S and just about every position was a position of need. He seems talented, I hope for the best, but if he is a little touched in the head I would much rather see a veteran player calling plays and leading the defense on the field. If they end up signing Foote, the only thing left to do is keep our fingers crossed and hope for the best. There is always next year to address the O-Line and D-Line.
Well I don't wanna be mean...
…but I hear under his jersey he has a T-shirt that reads “This helmet is not optional”.
That is hilarious!!!
And I am not one to bash mentally challeneged people either…..and by that I mean mentally retarded. Delmas is not mentally retarded, but he is not the brightest crayon in the box either. My friends and I, after reading that he scored so low on the wonderlic, were calling him “Dumas” instead of Delmas. The name’s Dumas….dumbass…..lol (I loved that commercial).
The wonderlic..
means nothing when it comes to football. Marvin Harrison scored a 12. Drew Henson score a 42, while Marino score a 15. Oh, so did Terry Bradshaw. You keep trashing Delmas because of a test. The question do not translate to the football field.
Let me guess
http://www.unc.edu/~mirabile/Wonderlic.htm
Was this your link?
While these scores may be accurate, they are not verified. Read the disclaimer on the website.
I am wondering why you are being so defensive JCruize? I was joking for one, and secondly I do think a players intelligence plays a key factor to their success. This guy is going to have to learn a complex defensive scheme. It has been said that he could be responsible for calling plays and audibles on defense. Personally, I would rather have someone with above the below average mark of intelligence Quarterbacking my defense. Sure, the guy may play smart…..but was he the guy calling the shots for WMU’s defense? Did he have to understand and recognize multiple offensive schemes and defensive responsibilities in college? I think not. The results of the Wonderlic test provide the individual’s ability to cope with the complexities of any particular occupation. The general consensus among psychologists is that cognitive ability—as tested on the Wonderlic—is the most reliable predictor of an individual’s professional performance. Scoring poorly is a strong indicator that an individual does not think quickly and struggles to solve problems with ease. Does that sound like a person that you want reading complex offensive sets and calling audibles or defensive plays? You made mention of two hall of fame QB’s in your post. These guys are clearly the exception to the rule. Out of the thousands of men who have taken the Wonderlic test, these two guys bucked the trends and succeeded. Drew Henson has been a failure, but is that indicative of his intelligence, or the fact that he was never coached to start in the NFL? He got his chance to start, but was he coached into that role or was he thrown into it and expected to succeed? Marvin Harrison needed to know 3 things to be successful….which route do I run (In, Out, Slant, Post, Go, Drag, Flag, or Screen), get open, and catch the ball. he didn’t have to read the offense, he didn’t have to call plays, he didn’t have to call audibles…….he had Peyton Manning (The brains of the offense) to do all of that. Louis Delmas is going to call plays and audibles for our defense? He has to know what set the offense is in, he has to be able to recognize situational contexts, he has to be able to think quickly and concisely, he has to be able to know what his role is in each defensive set, he has to know what the roles of everyone else is in each defensive set, he has to know what the best defense is to counteract each offensive set, and he has to know what teams do with different personnel packages, among other things. Does his score of 12 on the Wonderlic say that he can do all of that? Quite contrary……it indicates that he will not be very successful at doing exactly those things. Will he be the exception to the rule? We should hope so. Playing safety in the NFL, especially being the captain of the defense and the one man who is responsible for calling plays and audibles, is not all about running, hitting, and defending passes. The modern game of football is a thinking mans game, no matter which way you cut it.
Oops.....I should say hundreds of NFL prospects.....thousands of people have taken the Wonderlic test
I’m not defending or criticising anyone but I don’t much care for the Wonderlic test. It’s never really been a good indicator of how a player will pan out.
Fair enough
Purely from a psychological standpoint, can you argue that it doesn’t matter? Physically, and quite possibly even instinctively, the guy has all of the tools. I am just hoping that his intelligence does not hinder his physical ability and instincts.

by 














