Detroit Lions Notch a Good Loss in New Orleans
Everyone just calm down.
I’ve heard a whole lot of comparisons to the 2008 Detroit Lions after Sunday’s 45-27 trampling at the hands of the New Orleans Saints.
It’s understandable; they did lose by 18 points, and they are the 2009 Lions. It’s natural to compare them to last year’s version.
As I remember, though, the 2008 Lions lost to roughly the same Saints 42-7, and that was without an injury to their top cornerback against the league’s most prolific passer.
So let’s get the bad stuff out of the way first.
Yes, the Lions lost. Yes, it was an 18-point loss, and their 18th-straight loss. Yes, they became the first modern-era team to have a losing streak spanning three seasons. No, they didn’t even cover a double-digit spread (13).
Yes, Drew Brees threw six touchdown passes and a second-string running back had a career day. Yes, Matthew Stafford had a bad day, showing his inability to finish drives and a propensity to throw interceptions at the worst possible time (two of his picks were caught inside the 20-yard line).
Kevin Smith was shut down and Calvin Johnson had only three catches, though one was for what should have been a long touchdown.
Heard enough? Good. I know the Lions lost big, and in many ways it looked very bad. Now let me follow that up with two very important words:
So what?
That’s right, I don’t care. Anybody who expected to open the season in New Orleans with a big, statement-making win needs to start up a support group with Joey "Blue Skies" Harrington, Jon "10 Wins" Kitna, and Kevin "20 Touchdowns" Smith.
Temper your expectations, people. If you didn’t believe it before, believe it now. We are not looking at a playoff team. Deal with that. The Lions are going to lose a lot of games this season, and the Saints are one of the toughest games on the schedule, so what’s the problem?
Now, having said that, with as bad as it looked, it wasn’t as bad as it looked.
See, despite the final score, the game wasn’t a blowout. At no point did the Saints pull their starters and start beating down the Lions with second-string players. In fact, it was still a reasonably winnable game (though a long shot) until Stafford’s third interception.
Though they never led, the Lions never trailed by more than the 18 points they lost by. In fact, after falling behind by 14 points early on, they battled back to within four points early in the second quarter.
At any given point, the Lions were one missed opportunity away from making it a much closer game.
Much of that has to do with Stafford. The interceptions he threw were momentum-killers, and he was unable to get touchdowns instead of turnovers or field goals.
But he’s a rookie quarterback, and he’s making rookie quarterback mistakes. This is his first real game against NFL competition, and therefore the first in which he must realize that his gifted right arm is not enough to carry him to success without good decision-making.
His problems and mistakes are coachable, and he will learn, but expecting him to know it before he steps foot on the field is unrealistic. These are games Stafford has to have before he learns what throws he can make at this level and how.
For that matter, these are games the entire Lions team has to have.
They fought hard, but at the end of the day, they were outgunned. The Saints are a team thinking playoffs, and the Lions are looking to snap an 18-game skid.
I’m not going to say this is a moral victory, because I don’t believe in moral victories. For a team that hasn’t won a game in almost two years, the only moral victory this season will be the numeral "one" on the left side of a hyphen.
That being said, as losses go, this one could have been worse. The Lions were supposed to lose this game, and they did, but they didn’t perform below any reasonable set of expectations.
They will get better, visibly, as the season goes on. More than half of this year’s 53-man roster was not on last year’s 53-man roster, so chemistry is a major issue.
And hey, the Lions have all kinds of issues, all over the field. We know this, but don’t throw them under the bus yet.
The only question right now is whether the Lions are playing better than last year, and if they’re headed in the right direction.
After one game, the answers to both questions are yes. It’s unusual to say that after a 18-point loss, but this is a team under unusual circumstances, who lost to the same team by 35 points last season.
So everyone calm down and enjoy the show. Start a pool at the office for the Lions’ first win. Smile politely at the guy who picks "2010." But don’t be that guy, don’t throw your hands up in September.
This ride is only beginning, and it will get better soon.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Pride of Detroit's main writer, Sean, or the site in general. FanPosts are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable fans.
0 recs |
20 comments
Comments
Exactly On Buchanon
I made that point on another post somewhere on here too
by BennieBladesFan on Sep 15, 2009 12:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree 100%
This week at home against an overrated Vikings team should be exciting. I cant wait.
by IowaLion on Sep 15, 2009 12:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
agreed so pumped
Kevin Smith let em kno, Ernie Sims Break em, Calvin Johnson you already Kno
2009 Detroit Lions 6-10 to 8-8
by DetroitLions 4 life on Sep 15, 2009 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
section130
any body know if its gonna be a ‘white out’?
by CLF on Sep 15, 2009 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ha... section 109... wondering the same thing....
by DrewsLions on Sep 15, 2009 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
section 115...
and I’ll be tailgating in the Eastern Market, gonna be an early start driving in from Muskegon. If anyone else plans on grilling out there beforehand let me know, maybe get a POD meet and greet going on.
by lions_sucker on Sep 15, 2009 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
SHEEEEEIT
I’ll be driving from Boyne City. sounds like we’re going to eat be fore the game at Elwoods.
I got a cheap Drew Stanton Jersey on ebay for $20.
by CLF on Sep 16, 2009 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, I'll be rocking my authentic Stafford jersey...
got a KILLER deal on it. My son will also be sporting his Stafford jersey… replica… I’m not that crazy!
by DrewsLions on Sep 16, 2009 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah.. so the killer deal...
not so killer. Got my jersey yesterday and it wasn’t in very good shape from shipping. Damn. Guy’s gonna replace it, but won’t happen in time for the game. So… I’ll still wear this one to the game and send it back afterwards. That’s the least they owe me for not getting it here quicker. BTW… the price was $50. And yes… if the shipping process hadn’t “melted” tissue wrap to the sleeves, it was a true blue NFL Reebok authentic jersey for 50 bones. Okay, so it’s still a killer deal as I’m getting a replacement.
by DrewsLions on Sep 17, 2009 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i got a black reebok cj one last year for the same in cdn$$
by londonlion on Sep 18, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow....
So you got you jersey for about $46 USD…..nice
Drew….I’d like some info about your source if you don’t mind. Kdawg26m@yahoo.com
by KDawg on Sep 18, 2009 7:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
BINGO!
I saw many things I expected:
Brees passing for a monstrous game, a balanced attack from New Orleans, an effective Saints Secondary led by the leagues leading interceptor in Woodson taking advantage of a rookie, an inneffective dline
but also saw many things I was excited by…
Staff hitting CJ for what should have been a huge TD play (not the last), an explosive special teams unit (still think they are missing follett), corners making some coverage plays, delmas making plays from the safety spot, our lb’s looking like they trust eachother to make plays & not getting caught out of position.
it will be a tough front half…but if the team holds together & keeps their resiliancy about them like they showed (it will get tougher towards week 5 & 6, game over game) i am really excited to see the results against teams we are better than in the second half. a lot can change between now & then…but i am really excited to see this team play in games where we should win. that will tell the shape of this team in its true colours…either we have hope…or a mountain of work ahead…more than any of us have thought.
by londonlion on Sep 15, 2009 1:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Very well said
It’s great to hear that the majority of us here at POD are still optimsitic about our future. Sure, we lost the first one, big deal, it was always gonna be a tough one to win and we gave it our best shot and nearly came out smelling like roses. We have just gotta pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off and get ready for the Vikings, because I think we have a legitimate shot at winning that game.
2009 = The start of the Lions Golden Age (We hope).
by Hyperion Ecta on Sep 15, 2009 7:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
We do have a shot at beating the Vikes.
Just like we had a shot at neating the Saints. Nice to hear someone else say we could have won that game. We didn’t and the season goes on. Staff will still make mistakes, we won’t win them all, but I sure look forward to the Vikes this weekend and hope the D-line can at least slow down A.P. and give us a chance at beating them.
Nice post Voice. Stay strong and supportive my fellow POD members. It can only get better.
by Lead Hunter on Sep 15, 2009 8:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
that was not a winnable
game by any means first drive for the saints should of told you that…
by zeke313 on Sep 15, 2009 9:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Respectfully disagree...
A few key plays made the difference in that game, and if not for a couple of offensive stalls and rookie mistakes by Stafford, it was very winnable.
The offense sputtered occasionally, but the special teams were huge, and we were unable to capitalize on their mistakes.
Consider this:
If, instead of throwing interceptions in the red zone, the offense was able to score touchdowns, that’s 14 points on the board (accounting for Stafford’s two picks inside the 20). And if just one of the drives that resulted in a FG resulted in a touchdown (Hanson kicked a 24-yarder in the third quarter after a drive stalled inside the 10), that’s an additional 4.
4 + 14 = 18. How many did the Lions lose by?
Okay, so the Lions DIDN’T do those things, and that’s what separates them from perennial winners like the Steelers and Patriots. They have a long way to go. But calling that a “winnable game” merely refers to the fact that they had opportunities to make the game play out much differently.
by VoiceoftheLions on Sep 16, 2009 12:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good post and great rebuttal here
I must say, I am puking sick of seeing people say that the game last Sunday was not a winnable game…..BS!!
You made the same points here, in rebuttal, that I made on another thread previously. So I agree with you 100%. I would add that if we had taken away half of the 13 minutes that the Saints beat us by in the time of possession battle, that they may have scored one less TD (or more considering how easily the scored at times). If we had capitalized on our missed opportunities (not to mention that they were GREAT opportunities) while also doing a better job managing the game, WE WOULD HAVE WON THAT GAME! Not just we might have won it, but we WOULD have won it. Saying the game was not winnable is so short sighted that it makes me sick to my stomach.
by KDawg on Sep 16, 2009 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
some real important points.... or not
What’s most important to me is that I saw a few opportunists out there. That some situations even on defense arose and plays like Delmas picking up the fumble and running in for a touchdown happened. When Brown was receiving kicks I felt anything could happen. Remember, this is Detroit were talkin about no excitement allowed. You know what, I am still stoked about watching what happens next cuz opportunities will be there for us against the Vikes. Games can be won even if you don’t play your best.
by uggugg on Sep 16, 2009 3:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 















