Sprint Game Ball Of The Week: Nick Harris
This post is sponsored by Sprint.
I know what you're thinking. A punter? Really? How can a punter be deserving of a Sprint Game Ball?
Trust me, I realize it seems odd to give a punter a Sprint Game Ball, especially for a performance that included one of his punts being taken back for a touchdown, but allow me to explain.
After coming off of losses, especially ones that aren't close, it's often tough to single out one player for a good performance. Usually there aren't any that jump out at you after a double-digit loss, which was the case for the Cowboys game. Nobody's stats on offense or defense really jumped out at me, leaving me struggling to find a player to deserving of a Sprint Game Ball. So I moved on to special teams players and it hit me -- Nick Harris deserves recognition for his performance against Dallas. Why? Just take a look at his six punts from Sunday's game:
- (From 50) 48 yards, downed at the DAL 2
- (From DAL 47) 47 yards, touchback
- (From DAL 41) 37 yards, downed at the DAL 4
- (From DET 49) 47 yards, downed at the DAL 4 (The Lions got a safety on the very next play.)
- (From DET 44) 53 yards, picked up and returned from the DAL 3 for a 97-yard touchdown
- (From DAL 46) 46 yards, touchback
Of Harris' six punts, three were downed inside the five-yard line (John Wendling downed two of them). The one that was returned for a touchdown should have been the fourth downed inside the five, as Wendling again batted it down to keep it out of the end zone. Unfortunately Bryan McCann came out of nowhere and picked the ball up for a flukey 97-yard touchdown after it looked like the Cowboys would once again have awful field position.
Perhaps it says a lot about a game when a punter receives the Sprint Game Ball, but Nick Harris is definitely deserving based on how he played against the Cowboys. Three times he put Dallas on its own goal line, and one time that resulted in a safety. If not for McCann coming out of nowhere and picking up the ball on that touchdown return, Harris would have put four of his six punts inside the five, which is just remarkable. It didn't change the outcome of this game, but often times winning the field position battle like this can be the difference in a game, and Harris most definitely did his part in helping the Lions try to end their road losing streak.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm sort of speechless. This is a pretty damning indictment about how the rest of the team played.
Was there anyone who deserved it more? Nate, for instance?
Yeah Burleson wouldn't have been a bad choice
I guess I just wanted to reward Harris since his play stuck out more than anyone else.
Pride of Detroit, for Lions fans | SB Nation Detroit, for Detroit-area sports fans
Didn't count for shit, but Harris played well. So did Burleson, making up for that penalty.
the team needs to play smarter. Take it from me, building your fans’ hopes up with great plays sprinkled here and there mixed in with atrocious penalties and errors is not the way to create stability.
I don’t want add player does not have blue collar mentality,
even if he is great player. Piston should not quit your job. - OK from J
Great choice
I had the distinctly unhappy experience of watching the game with a dallas fan (man, it was a looong afternoon) and other than that miserably lucky return most of my few moments of pleasure came from observing said cowboy fan react in horror to their field position following Nicks masterful placement.
Our drives just stall at the 50 or 45 of the opponents side.
By what usually? Penalties.
"Winning is not everything. It is the only thing."
USUALLY Really? Did you check?
Here is the Link to the NFL.com Play by play: http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2010112105/2010/REG11/lions@cowboys/analyze/box-score#analyze-channels:cat-post-playbyplay
Out of eleven drives [I won’t count the last one that started with a minute to go in the game] two of the drives were stalled by penalties [#2 by a Raiola Hold, #4 by a Peterman clip and Burleson False Start]. Drive #2 ended in a FG from the 33 and #4 in a punt from the Dallas 42.
Drives #1 [Dallas 43], #3 [Dallas 47], #6 [Det 49], #7 [Det 44], and #10 [Dallas 46] all ended on downs with no penalties. Two drives resulted in TDs and two ended on turnovers.
I don’t like penalties either, but the offensive penalties did not stop this team from winning the game.
by NorthLeft12 on Nov 24, 2010 11:59 AM EST up reply actions
Penalties are a contributing factor to everything, they can suck momentum, cause frustration, which causes loss of concentration to a young team.
Your right, they don’t lose games, but no one thing loses a game. We were in the Red zone I believe, if not for that Peterman Clip, loss of possible points, a chance at more momentum lost. The games momentum and drive for a team is lost in a series of events.
As in, 97 punt return, late hit on kickoff return, fumble.
"Winning is not everything. It is the only thing."
Again, I am not defending the penalties...just asking that they be put in perspective.
The Felton turnover after the TD return, which itself was a terrible special teams eff up, was a bigger negative to me. Although the Lions responded to the following Dallas TD with a very good TD drive of their own.
This game was a second consecutive very poor effort by the O Line. Besides the penalties and lack of run blocking, they gave up three sacks that ended drives and put the Lions out of FG range as well.
I really don’t get why the O Line Coach is not getting more heat. NFL fans can’t seem to see past the Head Coach or OC.
I dunno.
When I brought it up I got told our o-line coach is a good coach and can only teach what Linehan tells him too. I don’t buy it, but that’s the cop out.
CLF was right. Stanton should be starting, and Hill can’t do anything until he’s behind in the fourth quarter.
I agree, especially with that last statement
But it is the coaches of higher positions that take the heat. Like when something goes bad in this country, blame the president. Heat comes with the title. I hope Linehan and Schwartz have been having nice chats with our O-line coach. Who is he anyways?
"Winning is not everything. It is the only thing."
Not true......I've been yacking FIRE YARNO,,,for the last 3 weeks.
Just to send a message, if no other reason. He has assistants that can handle what’s left of the season.
I agree totally
hes the first casualty the monday after the minnesota game.
by YpsilantiJeff on Nov 24, 2010 2:18 PM EST up reply actions
not sayin I'm just sayin
Don’t you have to win to get a game ball? Its sad that Nick Harris was an option to me that just shows how piss poor we played when the punters performance sticks out. I say give the ball to suh for no other reason than he can shove down Bradys throat! LoL
Did I mention..I love the Phonz!
by The Profiler on Nov 25, 2010 12:17 PM EST via mobile reply actions


































