Pride Of Detroit: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Along The Olentangy for Ohio State Fans!

Canal Street Chronicles writes article on Detroit's draft pick

Hi Guys,

Over at Canal Street Chronicles (SBNation's New Orleans Saints site), we are currently doing a community mock draft. Regular readers such as myself each were assigned a team in the upcoming draft, and were responsible for making that team's selection. We would then do a writeup of who the team would draft and why, and it is posted on the main page.

I was the proud writer of the Detroit Lions pick, and my article was posted this afternoon at the link below:

http://www.canalstreetchronicles.com/2010/3/5/1357438/csc-community-mock-draft-the

Please feel free to stop by and let me know what you think! I had a lot of fun researching your team and looking over your potential draft needs. I did a good amount of research over here at Pride of Detroit, and I think you guys have a great community!

I do take a few jabs at the Lions organization over the past decade (it's kind of hard not to), but I have to say that if there is another team besides my own I would like to see succeed, it's you guys. My jokes are directed at your front office, not towards you as fans.

So stop on by and let me know what you think. Am I right? Wrong? Mentally deranged?

Thanks!

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Pride of Detroit or its writers. FanPosts are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable fans.

1 recs  |  Comment 51 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Just the 1st round

It’s a pick a day, so around the time we hit #32 the draft starts.

After my research, though, I would have probably picked a guard with the 34th pick for Detroit. Either that or an OT to be converted to guard. Maybe a DE if a good enough one was available.

by Devin Grabarek on Mar 5, 2010 4:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Kyle Wilson or Jahvid Best are the targets. If both gone, then BPA which might wind up being a CB anyways, like Robinson from FSU.

Does anyone else want Toby from Stanford in the 3rd? I know he isn’t super fast, but to run a 4.5 at his size is impressive.

by Char Char Drinks on Mar 5, 2010 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Can't argue with either or those.

Though I personally doubt Jahvid Best will be available. I know a lot of mock drafts show him being there, but I think someone will snatch him up before.

by Devin Grabarek on Mar 5, 2010 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

In case anyone was wondering

The person who picked for St. Louis chose Sam Bradford #1, so Suh fell just perfectly for the #2 pick.

by Devin Grabarek on Mar 5, 2010 4:40 PM EST reply actions  

I like the Idea man

and it’s what I HOPE happens. The only problem I see is that we traded for a 3 technique tackle now, which means we might be looking to trade down. Big props though man I really enjoyed the hell out of it!

I have a 9" personality

by Waitingfortheroar on Mar 5, 2010 4:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah,

I did the write-up about 6 hours before free agency began . . .

But Suh would still fit in just fine.

By the rules of our mock, I couldn’t trade down, anyway, so it was a moot point for my research. I think if you can trade down, and the deal is right, you should.

by Devin Grabarek on Mar 5, 2010 4:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Then again . . .

. . . it seems like everyone with a top 5 pick wants to trade down so they don’t have to tie up so much money in an unproven player.

by Devin Grabarek on Mar 5, 2010 5:00 PM EST up reply actions  

which just makes bad teams worse

IMO. (sigh) . . . However you need def lineman that can consistantly rotate so I’m all about Suh or Berry.

I have a 9" personality

by Waitingfortheroar on Mar 5, 2010 5:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey Monkey

Don’t count out Berry as our first pick, pending what else happens during FA..

by davis0169 on Mar 5, 2010 5:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I certainly don't.

I think Berry is great, and would be a good pick. It’s a high spot to draft a safety, but as I said in the article, he is really good enough to consider.

Truth is, if Suh was off the board, I would really sweat over choosing between him and Gerald McCoy (and possibly an OT, but that’s because I’m higher on almost all of this year’s tackles that most draftniks).

by Devin Grabarek on Mar 5, 2010 5:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Not sure of my definitive order

Russell Okong from Oklahoma State, Trent Williams from Oklahoma, and Bruce Campbell (the one without a chainsaw for an arm) from Maryland. Some will say Campbell’s a reach.

In general, though, I just think offensive tackles are great to draft high in the 1st, because they are relatively safe picks (in that even if they don’t live up to the hype, you can often shift them inside and still have a starting player), and because they rarely make it to free agency unless they are too old, have serious injury risks, or are subpar players. I think the quality of a QB (and the development of one as well) is greatly linked to quality tackles.

by Devin Grabarek on Mar 5, 2010 6:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I hadn't heard much about

Campbell till the combine so it sounds like a stretch. How long have you been so high on him?

I have a 9" personality

by Waitingfortheroar on Mar 5, 2010 7:25 PM EST up reply actions  

did he show upper body strength?

He was the one with the really low 40 time right?

I have a 9" personality

by Waitingfortheroar on Mar 5, 2010 8:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Pretty sure he ran a 4.8

Which is kind of ridiculous for an o-lineman (unless I’m thinking of somebody else)

by Kalzilla on Mar 5, 2010 9:25 PM EST up reply actions  

yea.. he was the fasts OL in the combine

http://draftboardinsider.com/cgi-bin/prospect.cgi?id=1093

i like him b/c he is biger then okung.. much better run blocker… not as good of a pass but he just a much more even OT has no weakness but isn’t jaw dropping in any thing either

by det32 on Mar 5, 2010 9:27 PM EST up reply actions  

OK

I just read most of that article and tried to become a member just so we could chat. As most of us see it, It’s going to come down to 3 players pending no trade downs. Suh/Berry and an after thought to most of us is Okung. You mentioned something about no one drafts Safeties this early and that’s not altogether right since it’s happened 3 times in the modern days, and we are one of those teams that did it. We drafted Bennie Blades with the 3rd overall pick back in the glory years (Barry Sanders) days. So now that we have a snot knocker in our backfield like Delmas it wouldn’t surprise any of us if we did take Berry in the first round to sure up our backfield. With those two guys back there it would definitely give our D-line some extra time to get to the quarterback. We have been having this debate for the last couple of days and now with us getting a DT already and Bosh we are not hurting as bad as before on the line. It would make all of us happy if we got Suh and 95% of us happy if we got Berry at the #2.

by davis0169 on Mar 5, 2010 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

It's true that some safeties are drafted that high

but it is still relatively rare. Again, if any safety appears to be worth it in the past decade, Berry is the guy. Part of the reason safeties aren’t drafted with the 2nd pick has to do with (the temporarily defunct) salary cap. It is a position that few teams want to spend a high percentage of their cap on, compared to say QB, DE, DT, OT, and occasionally CB.

As an LSU and SEC fan, I’ve seen a lot of Berry and think he is worth all of the hype.

by Devin Grabarek on Mar 5, 2010 6:23 PM EST up reply actions  

well done

We have been pulling for suh and berry for months and a few Mccoy supporters. Don’t feel bad even us fans take shots at the teams office its VERY hard not to. I hears William clay and Al davis have a agreement that the last one alive gets control of both teams.

The best there is, The best there was, and the best there ever will be - Bret the Hitman hart

by The Profiler on Mar 5, 2010 5:42 PM EST reply actions  

haha

and can only draft players who run a 4.3 or can throw it 70 in the air

I have a 9" personality

by Waitingfortheroar on Mar 5, 2010 5:47 PM EST up reply actions  

we get 2 sets of draft picks that way.

The best there is, The best there was, and the best there ever will be - Bret the Hitman hart

by The Profiler on Mar 5, 2010 6:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks Profiler

Yeah, I’ve read enough of the comments on this site to see that you guys take some worse shots than me at the Lions. Still, I wanted to make sure I didn’t come across as cocky or aggressive. It’s sort of a “I can make fun of my sibling, but if someone else does I’ll kick their @ss” kind of thing. Just didn’t want to come in and poo poo on your team, even if you guys do.

You raise an interesting question, though, that I’d love to hear all Lion’s fans take on: if you could switch out William Clay for Al David, would you?

I think I’d have to stick with Clay, because I’m about 90% certain Al Davis is a vampire and will never die.

by Devin Grabarek on Mar 5, 2010 6:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Al davis also played the crypt keeper did you know that LOL.

As a Lions fan I felt a great respect seeing the Saints finally get there day and the cardnials get there shot at it anyway. I just hope someday the world will get to see the blue and silver on that big stage as well. I’d stay with clay I think he’s not smart but hes consistent Al is all over the place.

The best there is, The best there was, and the best there ever will be - Bret the Hitman hart

by The Profiler on Mar 5, 2010 6:45 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah WCF all

day. I mean WCF is unsuccessful but, Al davis is 100% insane

I have a 9" personality

by Waitingfortheroar on Mar 5, 2010 7:01 PM EST up reply actions  

It's funny,

But after watching my team win the title, it has completely changed my perspective on peripheral teams that I root for. Whenever there was a Superbowl, I used to root for the team that had a player I liked, the team that the Saints didn’t have a rivalry with, etc. After going through the experience, though, I will be rooting for the team that has never won it, or the team that has gone the longest without winning it (so long as my team isn’t involved). After so many years of sadness, anger, boredom, frustration, etc., it really was a great feeling that justifies all the suffering that comes before it. And I really hope every fan of every team gets to experience it. The Atlanta Falcons might be my least favorite team, but if they made it to the big dance, I would root for them simply so their fans could experience that happiness.

And thus, I like Detroit. You have been in the Bermuda Triangle of Talent with the Saints and the Cardinals, and now that each of us has made it to the Superbowl, I hope you guys do too.

by Devin Grabarek on Mar 5, 2010 7:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't forget about the Buc's

They were putrid as well and even they won 1.

by davis0169 on Mar 5, 2010 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

yes please

don’t let Tampa off the ish train lol

I have a 9" personality

by Waitingfortheroar on Mar 5, 2010 8:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Truth be told

That’s exactly why I would root less for them in a Superbowl situation. Their fans already won once this decade, and I’m just a socialist when it comes to sports happiness: redistribute the wealth for all!

Though they do have some epic years of suckitude that should cause me to root for them (despite being a rival), I’m very upset they finally ran a kickoff return for a TD a couple years ago. It was the first time in franchise history! They went 32 seasons, 1,902 tries and 512 games without a single one. That was undoubtedly one of the most improbable stats of futility in any major sport.

by Devin Grabarek on Mar 5, 2010 8:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Correction: I'm a sports socialist . . .

. . . except when it comes to my team. Then I’m a greedy, capitalist fat-cat!

by Devin Grabarek on Mar 5, 2010 8:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Great post

And a good pick…good work.

The Bringers of Hope: Stafford - Delmas - C. Johnson - Pettigrew - Levy - Hill - Schwartz
Zack Follett: he will hurt your mind.

by Hyperion Ecta on Mar 5, 2010 7:42 PM EST reply actions  

Nicely Done!

DOn’t see too many posts with pics and vids…its was nice to see that. and congrats to you and your team…you guys deserved it more than any other city

The beginning of the end of the misery

by latif on Mar 5, 2010 8:43 PM EST reply actions  

Thanks!

It’s been a great year for us. I just hope I don’t become our fans don’t become bitter and entitled when the stars don’t align just right for us in the future. For all the bliss that comes with a title, there is something great about being the fan of a scrappy underdog team with a history of futility that I think we might have lost with a year of success.

by Devin Grabarek on Mar 5, 2010 8:48 PM EST up reply actions  

love my big ten

huge drew brees fan

The best there is, The best there was, and the best there ever will be - Bret the Hitman hart

by The Profiler on Mar 5, 2010 9:58 PM EST reply actions  

Clearing a few things up...........

There’s been a lot of talk about “where you draft ____position, and where you don’t.”

So let’s get this straight………

1. Some NFL owners (Al Davis, etc.) and GM’s (Matt Millen, etc.) are idiots and make bad draft picks?

2. Players from ALL positions have flopped as high picks in the past? Drafting a certain position over another in the top 3 does not guarantee a “sure thing”?

3. Schwartz said he wants to draft the PLAYER, not the POSITION?

"When talk about that slot and how much money it’s going to take, it’s a different animal,‘’ Schwartz said. "I’ve said before, we want to make sure we get the right person there, not necessarily lock into a particular position. The mistakes I’ve seen made in the NFL are ‘Hey, we have to draft a running back here,’ Or ‘We have to draft an offensive line or a quarterback.’ I think a better philosophy is to let your hand play out. Try to get the right player, not necessarily the right position.’’

4. Historically, very few safeties AND very few DT’s have been drafted in the top 3?

This reminds me of something I read about former Oakland A’s GM Billy Beane and his “moneyball” concept. Some have the mistaken impression that it was all about slow power hitters who could draw walks. According to Beane, what it actually was about was drafting and signing things that were undervalued in the market. Baseball, like football, evolves, which means some coaches/GM’s will be innovators who are ahead of the curve, and some will be stupid, stubborn, resistant to change, live in denial, spout cliches about picks and shovels and trenches, and lag behind the curve.

So it is with the NFL. The NFL has increasingly become more of a passing league, with rule changes to protect QB’s and receivers, more Martz-style 4-wide sets, faster TE’s, etc. To counter this, some innovators like Jim Schwartz, Dick LeBeau, and Tony Dungy have incorporated faster safeties with man cover skills into their defenses, guys like Louis Delmas, Chris Hope & Michael Griffin, Troy Polamalu, and Bob Sanders. These guys have been to Pro Bowls and have often been dominant on defense. The value of Polamalu and Sanders in particular has been noticable in the play of their defenses when they are absent. Yet some are still in denial about the change in the influence of safeties…….attributing it to other players, sunspots, phases of the moon, and maybe the Mayans. But the play of elite safeties is obvious when they’re on the field, and the difference in play by their replacements is just as obvious. It’s not the “other players”……..it’s not the Mayans, either. It’s like trying to deny that many TE’s are now faster. The offenses evolve, and defenses evolve to counter those new tricks. It’s been going on as long as the NFL has been in existence.

How this relates to moneyball is that even though the intrinsic value of elite safeties has increased due to the changes in the game, some stupid GM’s (remember, they do exist…..we should know) still refuse to draft safeties high. Safeties are currently undervalued in the draft relative to their influence on the game. Old dinosaur GM’s still think they can get a “good enough” safety later, and don’t realize the value of an elite safety in today’s ever-changing game.

The final irony is that historically, DT’s have ALSO rarely been drafted in the top 3, yet I keep hearing the argument that “you can’t draft a safety that high”……….but I don’t hear the argument that “you can’t draft a DT that high”. It’s hypocrisy, pure and simple.

Luckily, Schwartz doesn’t care about any of that. He drafts the player, not the position.

Honorary Driver of the Kyle Wilson Bus and Keeper of the Dreadlocks!
The 313 Missile Squadron: Delmas, Berry, Wilson......seek and destroy!
Hey, as long as Zack Follett keeps hitting people, he can rap to Barney the Dinosaur for all I care.

by GRLion on Mar 6, 2010 3:15 AM EST reply actions  

I agree with you on 95% of the content

The only thing I would say(just playing devils advocate) is that most of the teams who are consistantly good the colts, steelers, patriots, etc, always draft the big 4 positions in the first 2 rounds cositently. They are(obviously you have to have a good QB first) LT, CB, DE, and wide out. It helps to always be picking in the latter third of the 1st round and not have to pay them top money also.

I have a 9" personality

by Waitingfortheroar on Mar 6, 2010 9:52 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree about 95% too

Except for the fact that teams do have to be somewhat aware of the position of the player and the typical cost of them. The best quarterbacks in the game get $100 million+ contracts (over mutiple years, of course), so paying $40-$50 million (how much does a team spend on 2nd pick exactly) on one with the 2nd pick of the draft isn’t that big of a deal. Kickers, on the other hand, are much cheaper. That $40-50 million would make your kicker the richest in the league. Without a salary cap, this may not be such a big deal, but with one it is.

I agree with the point that safeties (and DTs), though historically not taken as high as other positions, are probably worth it in the modern game. After the effect Darren Sharper had for my team this year, I can certainly advocate safeties being able to change the quality of a defense.

by Devin Grabarek on Mar 6, 2010 3:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's blog that is your source for everything Detroit Lions.
Start posting about the Lions »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Lions_small
Chapter IV - A New Hope
Leo-smurf_small
Suh's Double Facemask Takedown Inspires Fear Into Hunted Quarterbacks
Small
Serious Question
Dylan_small
I can't stand this any longer
Dirkness_small
What's New Around the NFC

Recent FanPosts

Small
Why stop at K Smith .. next ? :)
Bilde_small
SUH Fined $7,500- NO SUSPENSION
Small
Preseason is nothing more than glorified practice
Hanginthere_small
Which bubble player makes the cut based on last nights game?
Leo-smurf_small
Five unanswered preseason questions: 2. Will Jay Cutler survive the regular season?
Valentine-vodka-_small
Lets "Mayhew" the Steelers?
Small
Defence?
Lions_small
Strangest play of the night...........
Img00013-20100717-2143_small
K-Smooth

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo

2010 NFL Preview, Dallas Cowboys: Playing For A Home Super Bowl

Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger warms up before a preseason NFL football game against the Denver Broncos Sunday, Aug. 29, 2010, in Denver. (AP Photo/Jack Dempsey) +49 updates

Ben Roethlisberger's Suspension Reduced To Four Games By Roger Goodell

PITTSBURGH - AUGUST 25:  Byron Leftwich #4 of the Pittsburgh Steelers warms up prior to the preseason game against the Carolina Panthers on September 2 2010 at Heinz Field in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania.  (Photo by Jared Wickerham/Getty Images) +1 updates

Steelers QB Situation Takes Turn For Worse: Byron Leftwich Has Partially Torn MCL

More from SBNation.com >


Managing Editor

Pod_small Sean Yuille

Writer

New-lions-logo_1__small DrewsLions

Icon_small ty@thelionsinwinter