Lions Content with Julian Peterson's Contract?
The Lions' situation at linebacker has been one of the more interesting storylines this offseason. The emergence of DeAndre Levy at the end of 2009 set the wheels in motion for the Larry Foote saga that ultimately resulted in him going back to Pittsburgh, but that was far from the only thing going on at the position. For example, Ernie Sims was traded to Philadelphia right before the draft, opening up a starting spot at linebacker and causing speculation to fly over who would replace him.
The other storyline at linebacker dealt with Julian Peterson. Going into the offseason, many believed out of Peterson, Foote, and Sims, it was the former Spartan that had the smallest chance of returning to the Lions. After all, he isn't getting any younger, and his contract this year is worth $7.5 million. What's more, Martin Mayhew revealed at the combine that he had talked with Peterson's agent, possibly about restructuring his contract.
All of the speculation over what would happen with Peterson was really pushed aside by the other storylines that I already mentioned. With the news that Foote was not going to be brought back and Sims was headed to Philly, suddenly Peterson became an afterthought because he was the only proven linebacker left on the roster. That is still the case as we near June, and it looks like that will probably not change as we get closer to the season, both because right now it doesn't seem like the Lions are going to bring in a new linebacker and also because it doesn't look like Peterson is going anywhere.
Peterson said Thursday he hadn't heard about his contract since Mayhew's initial talk with Poston.
"As far as I know, they just had a nice conversation," Peterson said. "I'm still here. We'll see. I want to stay here."
The Lions could approach Peterson again before the regular season starts. But unless they are willing to cut or trade him, they would have no leverage. And it should be noted there is no salary cap in the NFL this year.
Asked whether he has any nervousness or feels in limbo at all, Peterson said: "I've been around too long. It is what it is, at times. You can't worry about that. You've got to go out here and do your job, everything else will take care of itself."
Big contract or not, the Lions can't afford to lose a player like Peterson in my opinion. If Larry Foote had been re-signed or if Ernie Sims was still on the team, then the Lions would have some flexibility and as mentioned in the quote above, some leverage. Right now, though, Peterson has the leverage simply because he is the Lions' only proven linebacker. Detroit can't go to him and say, "Julian, we need to restructure your deal or make a move to get rid of you. We have younger players that deserve a chance, so it's your call -- take the pay cut or pack your bags."
The reason the Lions can't say that is because they essentially already did with Foote and Sims. Foote wanted a deal the Lions weren't going to offer, so Detroit decided to simply go with DeAndre Levy. With Sims, they had the opportunity to trade him because they obviously feel good enough about somebody like Zack Follett. While a hole was created, Lions coaches must not be too concerned about the task of finding someone to replace Sims.
With two changes coming already to the starting lineup at linebacker this coming season, the Lions can't afford to cut a veteran like Peterson loose. That would stretch the depth too thin, and besides, in this case paying the $7.5 million is worth it to not have to worry about the linebacker position suffering from another loss.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Its good it looks like hes not going anywhere...
…hes the best LB we have and this year will be even better with the improved D Line.
by BennieBladesFan on May 24, 2010 3:43 PM EDT reply actions
have to agree as well
sure he is getting older ut julian has a great track record thats very hard to agrue with. He a solid vetran and I think his 2nd year in this defense will be much better and with the new D line it should allow him to do much more in blitz packages and improve his coverage as well. Say what you want but theres a reason peterson makes the big bucks$$$
Louis Delmas is gonna lay the MAC down on your candyass
Follett and Suh IN YO FACE!!!
by The Profiler on May 24, 2010 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Watch out next year Peterson
Without great numbers, you will be dropped for… um… who else we got back there? The Army kid? Uh, watch out or we might get a free agent to replace you!
Yup...
…Id hate to the spartan go but if he doesnt prioduce he wil be gone…No reason to think he wont though.
by BennieBladesFan on May 24, 2010 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions
He's obviously wildly overpaid
but, as you said Sean, he’s the only proven NFL LB on the roster, so we don’t really have a choice in the matter, we have to hold on to him for at least this season, and due to the lack of a cap this year it won’t hurt us. HOWEVER, barring a Pro Bowl season from him (and since he’s turning 32 in July that seems very unlikely) I don’t see how we can keep him next year for what he’s making. He made it clear he wasn’t willing to restructure his contract, so I will be shocked if he’s still a Detroit Lion in 2011.
We'd have to keep him
He’s all we’ve got at LB, plus, he wasn’t horrible last year, although I’d rather see him play improve a bit this year. I don’t expect to see JP goin anyway.
"Zack Follett: he will hurt your mind." - Pride Leader, Sean Yuille, wielder of the Ban Hammer.
2010 Wests Tigers : Current record - 4-2 : Current Position - 7th : Last game - Defeated by Canterbury Bulldogs 24 - 4
I agree he is overpaid but a wise man once said, you are worth what you can get.
If the Lions are comfortable with his contract then so am I.
I also agree with the sentiments above regarding a pending improvement this year of Peterson’s performance. The 2nd year in the defense, the improved defensive line, and a year of evolution. What I mean by a year of evolution is that the defense we ran last year was very basic. It was new to everyone so there were a lot of things we did not even have in the playbook. Not only was it a new defense but we had some glaring holes on the roster that prevented us from being as flexible as we can be in play calling, not to mention the fact that we were always against the ropes on the score board. Add in the third factor of evolution in special players like Suh and KVB and there is overwhelming indication that not only will Julian’s play be better this year, but many other players too.
To go back to a Schwartzism, the idea is to basically keep adding talent around other talent and the play on the field increases exponentially as the talented players feed off of each others good plays.
I believe Sims
Will be to Philly… as Redding was to Seattle.
I don’t think he has it ‘upstairs’ to be a stand out starter on that caliber of team.































