LoJack's Eight Sacks, or Was it Six Sacks?
It was brought to my attention that the Pro Football Focus stats on the number of sacks recorded by DE Lawrence Jackson (eight) was incorrect.
The sacks recorded by NFL.com says that LoJack had only six sacks.
Who got it right? Who got it wrong? Could they have been wronger? I was determined to find out, and heap shame upon the poser, whoever it might be.
So, I got out my Meerschaum pipe, my hounds tooth cap and donned my cape for an investigation.
"Come, come, Dr. Watson! We’re off to the film room!"
OK, I made that up. I was sitting at my laptop in my bathrobe, drinking coffee and dining on a Krispy Kreme. Alright! It was two Krispy Kremes.
You guys are brutal!
Off we went to that hallowed shrine Ty Shalter, of The Lions in Winter, aptly characterizes as "The Temple of the NFL Oracle." Otherwise known as YouTube videos.
First, I went into those Premium Stats at PFF (that were so kindly paid for by my part time employer, DraftTek.com). I looked up the game by game stats for our quarry, LoJack. Hmm. LoJack played in 11 games, starting none.
Now I looked at the column where those sacks were recorded. Indeed, there were eight of those nuggets, neatly tucked away for our perusal. I made some notes on which games those sacks were recorded, along with other data that I felt was pertinent.
Next, I consulted the Oracle—er, YouTube videos for those games where LoJack had recorded those eight sacks. Here’s what I uncovered:
Week 3 @ Minnesota
From the left DE position, LoJack played 8 of 74 defensive snaps. He recorded a sack on Brett Favre at 7:54 of Q4.
Week 10 @ Buffalo
From the left DE position, LoJack played 31 of 61 defensive snaps. He sacked Ryan Fitzpatrick at the 9:25 mark of Q1.
Week 11 @ Dallas
From the left DE position, LoJack played 36 of 65 defensive snaps. He sacked Tony Romo twice. The first was at the 13:45 mark of Q3. The second was at the 11:04 mark of Q4.
An anomaly was uncovered that might shed some light on the discrepancies between the NFL.com, and PFF.com stats. PFF does not record half—sacks. They award a whole sack for each sack that a player participates in.
LoJack’s first of two sacks in the Dallas game was indeed a half—sack.
Week 13 Green Bay
From the left DE position, LoJack played 54 of 66 defensive snaps. He sacked Matt Flynn twice. The first was at the 1:03 mark of Q2. The second was at the 6:58 mark of Q4.
Like the Dallas game, LoJack’s first sack should have been recorded as a half—sack.
Week 15 @ Tampa Bay
From the right DE position, LoJack played 38 of 73 defensive snaps. He recorded a sack on Josh Freeman at the 12:58 mark of Q4.
This sack was credited by the announcer to Turk McBride, but it looked like Freeman was tripped up from behind by LoJack. The video was inconclusive, so I dialed up a Pro scout associate and asked him to look at that point in the game film. I did not suggest to him who made the sack, but asked him to tell me who should have received the credit.
He phoned me back after watching four views of that play. The camera angle from behind the Buc’s offense clearly indicated that it was LoJack’s sack.
Week 17 Minnesota
Playing the right DE position, LoJack played 29 of 61 defensive snaps. He recorded a sack on Joe Webb at the 7:21 mark of Q3.
Conclusions (AKA My Spin)
If we take those two half—sacks, plus the sack on Freeman erroneously awarded to McBride, LoJack would have a total of six sacks.
Whose stats were correct? Well, both were wrong. PFF’s non recording of half—sacks is a glaring weakness in their recording criteria, and thus, their results. NFL.com’s failure to correctly award a sack to LoJack was likewise unforgivable.
The thing that I took away from the exercise was LoJack’s snaps per sack ratio. Applying seven sacks (the correct number) over the 377 snaps yielded 1 sack per every 53.9 snaps played.
"Honey, do we have any more Krispy Kremes?"
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Pride of Detroit or its writers. FanPosts are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable fans.
36 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks, Jeff!
Nope, this game was pre-Kitna, although Kitna collecting some rug burns would have been just as schweeeeet.
This last season? 11-21-10 We lost 19-35
by YpsilantiJeff on Jun 24, 2011 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Boxscore:
http://content.usatoday.com/sportsdata/football/nfl/game/Lions_Cowboys/2010/11/21
The upshot
Jon Kitna 18/24 149 75.0% 3tds 0ints
by YpsilantiJeff on Jun 24, 2011 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions
S'all good Brother Mikey :)
That game just frosted my bawls. Next to Scotty, Jon is my most loathed Lions QB. It still makes me squirm that he had such a lovely little outing against us. Also, I detest losing to the Pokes.
by YpsilantiJeff on Jun 24, 2011 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Jon Kitna bootleg TD for the win
I almost puked
'The reality is - the police become necessary in human society, only at that junction in a society where it is split between those who have, and those who ain't got' - Omali Yeshitela
"In the absence of logic it is not uncommon that sanity can only be found by embracing lunacy." – Leonuro, circa 2011
i think
the krispy kremes clogged your ears LOL
At that rate
Lo Jack could have 12-15 sacks next year if he gets a lot of reps (aka – partially takes over for KVB or there are some injuries to KVB or Avril again)…I’m going to go a head and guess 10 sacks – gotta be a little conservative right!?
The Dis-Assembly Line - The unofficial, official name for the next best D-line in football.
If Turk is on the roster in 2011, LoJack will probably get < 600 snaps.
Both were productive and played well on both sides of the line. Having DE’s and DT’s that see less than 600 snaps would keep those legs fresh and they would be even be more effective.
great write up and LoJack got heart too
and wasn’t it the dallas game where it looked like he got knocked out and came back to get a sack?
think he was listed as questionable the following week
by BillySimsMadeMeDo on Jun 24, 2011 5:43 PM EDT reply actions
funny
LoJackson94 Lawrence Jackson
Almost tackled this guy today at USC…. yfrog.com/kk8hioj
15 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply
I asked God for a bike, but I know God doesn't work that way. So I stole a bike and asked for forgiveness.
well
i guess you can’t link pics from twitter. it’s a picture of a guy walking by LoJack wearing a packers t-shirt, lol
I asked God for a bike, but I know God doesn't work that way. So I stole a bike and asked for forgiveness.
by yooperlionfan on Jun 24, 2011 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions
the article was nicely written
kinda reminds me of “the sports guy, bill simmons” stuff. and i mean that in the best way, (even if bill simmons sometimes has no clue what he’s talking about). he always talks about his kids or donuts apparently- and it makes him lots of moneys.
it’s nice to see something really well written, especially when now at all the detroit pistons sites everybody is just arguing over brandon knight…
lol.. Your in the Bathroom,
Drinking coffee, and eating doughnuts while on your laptop? Dude, isn’t that what the kitchen table is for? I will never look at crispy creams the same way again.
"Never underestimate the power of the Schwartz..."
"I see your Schwartz is as big as mine..."
"May the Schwartz be with you..."
"Liquid Schwartz!!!"
oh, bathROBE
My bad, sorry.
"Never underestimate the power of the Schwartz..."
"I see your Schwartz is as big as mine..."
"May the Schwartz be with you..."
"Liquid Schwartz!!!"
To be fair
he didn’t say he wasn’t in the bathroom. You could still be correct. Nice article Mikey, you keep writing them, I’ll keep reading them…although, now that I think about it, that’s not an enticing incentive for you to keep writing them…
It's turkey, Lions and Macy's. Any other combination is just ludicrous.
"Only a real man quotes himself in the 3rd person" - Nate D. circa 2011
"Ambition is a poor excuse for not having sense enough to be lazy." - Charlie McCarthy
Lay off the Krispy Kremes then.
DFA The Tampa Bay Rays
I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
Fear the Roar.
by TheLoneDavid on Jun 26, 2011 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Over 377 snaps, 7 sacks is remarkable.
I think if you asked any of these D-linemen, they would be proudest of their stats as a group. That’s how they roll.
Just a couple notes.
You’ve got it Week 13 Green Bay. Green Bay was week 14, not 13. That confused me for a bit because I was looking at the Chicago game and was confused as to why I couldn’t find the sack you mentioned.
ANYWAYS.
I went through the game books (which are what the NFL.com stats are derived from) and I came up with this.
2-4-DET 28 (8:33) B.Favre sacked at DET 36 for -8 yards (L.Jackson) – Week 3
3-10-DET 42 (9:30) (Shotgun) R.Fitzpatrick sacked at DET 49 for -7 yards (L.Jackson) – Week 10
3-15-DAL 15 (13:49) (Shotgun) J.Kitna sacked at DAL 7 for -8 yards (sack split by N.Suh and L.Jackson) – Week 11
1-5-DET 5 (13:39) J.Kitna sacked at DET 13 for -8 yards (L.Jackson) – Week 11
2-10-GB 41 (1:09) (Shotgun) M.Flynn sacked at GB 34 for -7 yards (sack split by L.Jackson and T.McBride) – Week 14
1-10-GB 18 (7:02) M.Flynn sacked at GB 12 for -6 yards (sack split by T.McBride and L.Jackson) – Week 14
1-10-DET 46 (13:01) J.Freeman sacked at TB 40 for -14 yards (L.Jackson) – Week 15
3-12-MIN 28 (7:27) (Shotgun) J.Webb sacked at MIN 20 for -8 yards (sack split by L.Jackson and C.Avril). – Week 17
You notice in bold is the Tampa Bay game. The announcer made the mistake, not the NFL. He was correctly credited for that sack. HOWEVER, you will also note the sacks from week 17 AND the second sack in week 14 were half-sacks.
Giving this data, you can see there were four total sacks and four half-sacks on LoJack’s year, amounting to a total of 6 (according to the NFL) or 8 (because PFF doesn’t record half-sacks.)
So what this all means is:
two rights don’t make a wrong.
I thought being lazy was a bad thing, So I gave up thinking.
by Wayne Fontes on Jun 26, 2011 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions
No, it doesn't
That’s like saying two positive numbers equal a negative number if you average them, and they don’t (not even if the second number is bigger than the first :)).
"It's a great day to be great, baby!"
"Here I am, brain the size of a planet,
and they ask me to pick up a piece of paper.
You call that job satisfaction?
'Cause, I don't."
So 6 or 7?
After all that analysis you still give two sack counts in your conclusion!
You meant seven right?
I say lets just use 8 as an unoffical/ offical POD stat.
from now on when ever I refer to LoJacks sack total. I will use 8.
Yooperlionfan is officially "the man"
the Lions D-Line: the Four Horsemen of the A-sack-alypse
Jim Schwart: Erasing the stink of Millen, one fist pump at a time.
P.C.P: It is not just for recreation anymore.
Like a Cliff Avril sack
Suh usually pushes a guy back into the QB,the QB will try to get away starts to fall and Avril is closest to the play so he gets a sack.This must have happened 5-6 times last year,I wonder why Suh didn’t get the sack,when clearly the guy was going down from the Suh play.

by 




























