Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Detroit Lions 53-Man Roster Prediction (Pre-Patriots Game Edition)

Maurice Stovall of the Detroit Lions celebrates after catching a touchdown pass from Drew Stanton.

I made one big change on each side of the ball for this week's Detroit Lions roster prediction. Let's start first with the change on offense.

WR Maurice Stovall in, FB Jerome Felton out

Stovall had an excellent game against the Cleveland Browns last week, catching four passes for 67 yards and one touchdown. More importantly, he showed he can be a reliable target at wide receiver. The same can't be said for Derrick Williams, who lost his spot in last week's roster prediction. Stovall has clearly passed him on the depth chart, and I now have Stovall securing a spot on the roster.

The difficult part about adding Stovall was deciding who should not make the 53-man roster. In the end I settled on Felton. When thinking about worth to the team, I ultimately decided that Stovall was more valuable to the Lions than Felton. Obviously there could be a problem with not having a true fullback on the roster, but I think Will Heller has shown enough at fullback to allow the Lions to part ways with Felton. Also, with Stefan Logan helping depth in the backfield (I probably should just list him as a running back instead of a receiver), the Lions can afford to go with Stovall at receiver instead of Felton at fullback.

Star-divide

LB Doug Hogue in, CB Nathan Vasher out

A number of you have disagreed with keeping Vasher over Hogue in my first two roster predictions, and I have finally come around to that line of thinking. In this edition I have Hogue, the Lions' fifth-round pick, making the team over the veteran Vasher.

The one disclaimer I will present is that Vasher not making the team is based on the assumption that Alphonso Smith will be healthy and ready to go in the regular season opener. It seems he's made progress with his broken foot, but if for some reason he's not healthy to start the season, you could see the Lions keep a sixth cornerback on their initial 53-man roster. I'm not sure which linebacker would be the odd man out in that scenario, but I have a hard time believing Hogue would make the team over Ashlee Palmer and Isaiah Ekejiuba.

In any case, you can check out my latest 53-man roster prediction below (players in bold are the ones I have making the team).

QB Matthew Stafford
QB Shaun Hill
QB Drew Stanton

QB Zac Robinson

RB Jahvid Best
RB Maurice Morris
RB Jerome Harrison
RB Aaron Brown

RB Mikel Leshoure (IR)
RB Ian Johnson
RB Mike Bell

FB Jerome Felton
FB Matt Clapp

WR Calvin Johnson
WR Nate Burleson
WR Titus Young
WR Rashied Davis
WR Maurice Stovall

WR Stefan Logan
WR Derrick Williams
WR Tim Toone
WR Nate Hughes
WR Demario Ballard
WR Dominique Barnes
WR Marcus Harris

TE Brandon Pettigrew
TE Tony Scheffler
TE Will Heller

TE Richard Dickson
TE Joe Jon Finley
TE Gijon Robinson

OT Jeff Backus
OT Gosder Cherilus
OT Jason Fox
OT Corey Hilliard

OT Johnny Culbreath
OT Kirk Chambers

OG Rob Sims
OG Stephen Peterman
OG Donald Thomas

C Dominic Raiola
C Dylan Gandy

C Dan Gerberry
C Rudy Niswanger
C Chris Morris

DE Kyle Vanden Bosch
DE Cliff Avril
DE Lawrence Jackson
DE Willie Young

DE Narada Williams
DE Keyunta Dawson

DT Ndamukong Suh
DT Nick Fairley
DT Corey Williams
DT Sammie Hill
DT Andre Fluellen

DT Robert Callaway
DT Quinn Pitcock
DT Montavious Stanley

LB DeAndre Levy
LB Stephen Tulloch
LB Justin Durant
LB Bobby Carpenter
LB Isaiah Ekejiuba
LB Ashlee Palmer

LB Doug Hogue
LB Caleb Campbell
LB Cobrani Mixon
LB DeJuan Fulghum

CB Alphonso Smith
CB Eric Wright
CB Chris Houston
CB Aaron Berry
CB Brandon McDonald
CB Nathan Vasher
CB Prince Miller
CB Paul Pratt
CB Anthony Madison

S Louis Delmas
S Amari Spievey
S Erik Coleman
S John Wendling

S Ricardo Silva
S Michael Johnson
S Aaron Francisco

K Jason Hanson
K Dave Rayner

P Nick Harris
P Ryan Donahue

LS Don Muhlbach

Comment 75 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Love it!

now if only we could get the FO to rubber stamp it!

The Dis-Assembly Line - The unofficial, official name for the next best D-line in football.

by rames on Aug 26, 2011 5:25 PM EDT reply actions  

agree

this seems like a solid line up barring injury.

few things to consider is the 7 lb’s I could see Hogue over Ekejiuba and giving Vasher the last slot. Hogue has a lot of praise and from some of the interviews seems like Schwartz would be willing to give him that chance knowing he can take his time in development behind the LB in place when Durant Tulloch Levy and Carpenter will already be the main 4 on the field.

Morris and the RB position probably beating a dead horse but could he be a sacrificial lamb going into the season ? thats little over 1 mill back on cap.

Hill/Stanton/Robinson – I dont know but im starting to like the upside Zac could have and less and less liking Hill this year. Not to mention Zac doesnt play w/ the first or second groups really. Originally Hill signed to a 1 yr contract he got an extra year extension makin this his last year. Stanton coming along and the way he has been playing games says he could be ready to take over that 2 spot. Leaving the 3rd to a new project if necessary. Hill to Miami for a 4-5th round pic getting back at least the pick that was stolen due the tampering charges.

A coward dies a thousands Deaths a soldier dies once ....

by JaiGaiaAries on Aug 26, 2011 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Only reason I could see them not keeping Ekejiuba is if they feel the changed kick off rules make him less valuable- but then again, with our coverage unit- it looks like we could just have Hanson pop them up and go wallop guys – trying to force fumbles at or before the 15… in that case, he makes a big difference IMO (he’s good at FFs).

Morris=lock

I was an apologist for Hill last year, but with Stanton’s development, I just don’t see why we need him. Stanton has been outplaying him by all accounts…I’d go with the youth personally – but I certainly don’t mind keeping our best 3 QBs on the roster (Staff, Stanton, Hill)

The Dis-Assembly Line - The unofficial, official name for the next best D-line in football.

by rames on Aug 26, 2011 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm feeling same thing about hill

Stanton is looking very reliable for a 2nd string QB, and zac is looking solid, would be nice to see him with the 2nd string players though and see what he can do.

I agree, hill could be some nice trade bait if he was looking a little bit better, him to miami would be a great fit giving the fact he could start there.

by jay_8118 on Aug 26, 2011 8:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Practice Squad

Based on this roster, I think we go:
Ballard
Mixon
Fulghum
Silva
Culbreath
Clapp
Finley
Pratt

The top five should be locks; I wouldn’t mind switching one of the bottom three out for a defensive lineman, especially if Finley can be traded like Gronk.

by mcivor on Aug 26, 2011 5:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Would love for Clapp to continue to develop

he looks like a monster and I soooo want a bruising lead back! I like Silva a lot as well!

Hope Cullbreath isn’t stolen (again)

The Dis-Assembly Line - The unofficial, official name for the next best D-line in football.

by rames on Aug 26, 2011 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Um, maybe it's me

or my browser, but they’re all bolded.

[...]when Giants coach Steve Owen, a certified defensive genius, was asked how he planned to stop Nagurski, he said: "With a shotgun, as he’s leaving the dressing room."

by NobodySpecial on Aug 26, 2011 5:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Yea its a problem with your browser

At least mine have bolded and non bolded.

Anyways i love the list

by Liontotheextreme on Aug 26, 2011 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Me Likey

"Some people watch adult videos on their computer. I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That’s what gets me aroused." - Jim Schwartz

by Eddie Apoc on Aug 26, 2011 6:17 PM EDT reply actions  

I am thinking that they are using Hilliard at G so they may only carry 2 pure guards making a spot for Felton

by Scott Huh on Aug 26, 2011 6:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Ya, I could see that too...

Considering Gandy backs up C and G as well.

He who laughs last didn't get it.

by ZWC11 on Aug 26, 2011 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good point

That’s certainly possible

Pride of Detroit, for Lions fans | SB Nation Detroit, for Detroit-area sports fans

by Sean Yuille on Aug 26, 2011 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

think felton will make it

maybe one of the linebackers gets cut to keep stovall

by redwingxviii on Aug 26, 2011 6:46 PM EDT reply actions  

I think Felton is at this point

I Heller has been playing the “F” spot in a some offensive formations. But the fact that he is 6’6 could cause some problems for Matthew and his passing lanes if Will is in playing the normal FB position.

Yooperlionfan is officially "the man"
the Lions D-Line: the Four Horsemen of the A-sack-alypse
Jim Schwart: Erasing the stink of Millen, one fist pump at a time.
P.C.P: It is not just for recreation anymore.

by JCruize on Aug 26, 2011 6:54 PM EDT reply actions  

yeah, but we rarely pass when we have a FB

when we do, I feel like the pocket often moves (such as bootlegs)

The Dis-Assembly Line - The unofficial, official name for the next best D-line in football.

by rames on Aug 26, 2011 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

BTW

Logan is, in fact, a “running back” now.

by Forward Down The Field on Aug 26, 2011 7:35 PM EDT reply actions  

'Tis a special time for Lions fans

For the first time in a long time, our 53-man roster is league-average and very competitive. By next year, I expect us to be having to part ways with a whole lot more NFL-caliber talent during camp cuts – and it’s going to feel good.

by Hussein Beydoun on Aug 26, 2011 7:52 PM EDT reply actions  

meh

I think we’ll be in a very similar situation…there is a cap limiting us…

The Dis-Assembly Line - The unofficial, official name for the next best D-line in football.

by rames on Aug 26, 2011 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am good with this roster

Barring injury or some surprising performances down the stretch, your roster is very close to what I would keep as well. Any differences we might have would be a matter of preference in where to have more depth, so I am not going to nitpick over that.

by TuffLynx on Aug 26, 2011 8:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Is Stovall really all that?

I saw him in his “breakout” game, but did he play well in the first game and has he looked good on special teams?
Given the Lions problems at RB, I would be surprised if they let Felton go for a WR. Felton is a useful special teamer too from what I recall.
I like the idea of keeping Hogue over Vasher although I think the Giants, Vikings, and Raiders will probably snap Vasher up.

Good article though. I am sure we all enjoy seeing the Lions have some hard decisions to make.

"Filling a need doesn’t necessarily mean you’re getting a good player," said Schwartz. "It doesn’t necessarily mean that you’re getting a player that best fits; it doesn’t necessarily mean that you’re getting a player that’s better than what you have already."

by NorthLeft12 on Aug 26, 2011 8:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Almost

I would drop WR davis and keep an extra O lineman like OT Johnny Culbreath
just sayin after a few of these guys come back to the line are they really gonna be 100%
just sayn

by BlackieP on Aug 26, 2011 8:44 PM EDT reply actions  

I'd rather have the development guys over the career special teamers

It’s great to have someone like logan to return kicks. But in the case of the O-line, I’d much rather have Lydon Murtha right now instead of wendling or ekejuiba, or even zach follet. We kept follet because he was a special teams beast but in the process risked losing a potential starting tackle, or at the very least a solid back up. With the new kick off rules I’m not sure how valuable wendling or davis will be so I’m totally in favor of keeping culbreath, hogue, or clapp over them.

The future is bright.

by joecool5672 on Aug 26, 2011 9:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Follett retired

He who laughs last didn't get it.

by ZWC11 on Aug 26, 2011 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

ya i know...

but its irrelevant because him retiring doesn’t bring lydon murtha back. i was talking about their rookie years when we put took him off the pc i believe.

The future is bright.

by joecool5672 on Aug 27, 2011 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

crap!

the ps!!!! (practice squad)

The future is bright.

by joecool5672 on Aug 27, 2011 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Follett

As I recall, both Follett and Murtha were on the practice squad. Follett was activated part way through the season for his special teams play. It’s not like Murtha was only on the PS because Follett took his roster spot.

by mcivor on Aug 27, 2011 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Special Teams is an important unit too

Just because the kickoffs are 5 yards closer doesn’t mean you can ignore special teams. We will still have to return and cover kicks. Teams are going to bring it out from further back then before and even if a team only returns one kickoff in a game, it’ll hurt if that return goes for 7.
Besides, we still need to cover punts. Good teams excel at all three phases of the game; offense defense AND special teams and that is not going to change; even with the new rules.

by waybai51 on Aug 26, 2011 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

field position is an under-rated component

both in terms of your chances to score and prevent scoring…

The Dis-Assembly Line - The unofficial, official name for the next best D-line in football.

by rames on Aug 27, 2011 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

i think last years special teams unit was just fine

so drop davis and wendling, keep hogue and culbreath. i wont be upset if we have a few good special teamers. but i think it is also possible to have a surplus when you end up sacrificing future starters to the ps, and risk losing them all together. also, so someone doesn’t state the obvious below, i realize wendling was on the team last year. i think coleman has played just fine on st and i’d be comfortable with him over wendling and just keeping 3 safeties.

The future is bright.

by joecool5672 on Aug 27, 2011 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

whoa

3 safeties. And what happens when 2 of them are injured? Then we’re back to square 1 – looking like the Lions of old…at least Wendling has been serviceable as a spot safety (all the while a pro bowler on ST)…

The Dis-Assembly Line - The unofficial, official name for the next best D-line in football.

by rames on Aug 27, 2011 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

well take your pick

wendling or coleman, it’s not a big deal to me. i’d rather have o-line depth so i’m willing to sacrifice a safety spot. that being said i haven’t really taken my time going through the roster. my main point is to keep developmental guys over a couple special teamers.

The future is bright.

by joecool5672 on Aug 27, 2011 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

If we had kept Murtha

would we have signed Corey Hilliard off someones PS toward the end of the year? Probably not imo. I think we’re better off with Corey.

Ah but I was so much older then and younger than right now

by Justan Oldfart on Aug 27, 2011 7:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

why

do they need a roster limit at all, why shouldn’t you be able to have as many players as you can sign, within the given salary cap? why not just let the cap, and a team’s ability to deal, dictate how many players they have?

I asked God for a bike, but I know God doesn't work that way. So I stole a bike and asked for forgiveness.

by yooperlionfan on Aug 26, 2011 9:53 PM EDT reply actions  

I think the logic is this.

It is simply because players want to play. Teams that are good could just hold good players that are better than guys on other teams to give themselves an edge. Good players could end up stuck on a depth chart and never see playing time and therefore never be afforded the oppertunity to earn more money. In the spirit of competition you want every team to be the best they can be too.

by MonteCarlo7888 on Aug 27, 2011 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good Roster!

Hey guys, long time reader. About three years to be exact, but first time poster. I usually, read these posts from work where I’m blocked from logging in. But thanks to the new app, here I am! I everyone’s insight, and being a Lions fan in Bears country I rely on all of you a lot!

Anyway, great roster, though I do think Felton and Vasher make the team. I’m just not sure who’d you take off. Personally, I’d like Brown gone, but I know I’m in the minority there.

by slopes44 on Aug 27, 2011 1:54 AM EDT via iPhone app reply actions  

sorry

Should be “I love everyone’s insight”

by slopes44 on Aug 27, 2011 1:56 AM EDT via iPhone app up reply actions  

I am with you as far as Aaron Brown. I just don't see that he adds anything to the team.

I would keep Felton over Brown. Logan can do what Brown does IMO.

"Filling a need doesn’t necessarily mean you’re getting a good player," said Schwartz. "It doesn’t necessarily mean that you’re getting a player that best fits; it doesn’t necessarily mean that you’re getting a player that’s better than what you have already."

by NorthLeft12 on Aug 27, 2011 7:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree about Brown.

But I can’t justify keeping him either but only because it’s a numbers game and can’t he how a fits into the overall picture.

.Does your momma have a Big Ass like your head?

by delusional on Aug 27, 2011 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

i like your icon!

didn’t notice it before.

The Dis-Assembly Line - The unofficial, official name for the next best D-line in football.

by rames on Aug 27, 2011 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks, it's good to be here

And actually participate for a change rather then just muttering to myself. BEST APP EVER!!!

by slopes44 on Aug 27, 2011 1:40 PM EDT via iPhone app up reply actions  

welcome

The Dis-Assembly Line - The unofficial, official name for the next best D-line in football.

by rames on Aug 27, 2011 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

Someone posted above...

about the PS, but since this is really the first year I’ve followed Pro football with any sort of depth, I have what is most likely a stupid question:
Is there a limit to how many players they can have on the PS? How do those spots get picked?

Sorry for my incompetence/ignorance/lack of knowledge. TIA.

by Dubie on Aug 27, 2011 7:30 AM EDT reply actions  

Welcome to the Pride and remember there are no stupid questions.

Here is a good article from 2010 covering the rules for Practice Squad players:
LINK: http://www.arrowheadpride.com/2010/8/24/1648313/nfl-practice-squad-explained-rules

You are allowed eight players and they can’t have much NFL experience. They can also be signed by any other team at any time. They just have to be kept on the signing team’s roster. I am not sure if there have been any changes to the PS in the new CBA. I did not notice anything on my Google search.

"Filling a need doesn’t necessarily mean you’re getting a good player," said Schwartz. "It doesn’t necessarily mean that you’re getting a player that best fits; it doesn’t necessarily mean that you’re getting a player that’s better than what you have already."

by NorthLeft12 on Aug 27, 2011 7:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Great

Thank you! I’ve been a lurker for a while this summer and preseason. I plan on visiting much more often during the season.

by Dubie on Aug 27, 2011 8:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

There are no stupid questions, just stupid people

I was only kidding!!! Thas ok, another qualude and you love me in the morning!

Go Blue!

Revenue - Expenses = Profit

by dezznutz1001 on Aug 27, 2011 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Still rooting for Ian Johnson

 With Javid sitting out this game, I really hope he can really make an impact and make the final roster. I’m not really sure if he has impressed the coaches and staff yet, but hopefully he can get some time with the first or second string this game.

Yeah, I'm on Zoloft, but I take that to keep from killing ya'll! - Mike Tyson

by xanderjd on Aug 27, 2011 7:46 AM EDT reply actions  

as am I!

I’m also rooting for Ballard and Clapp, but I honestly don’t see any of them making the team unless an injury occurs. Hopefully we can hide them on the PS.

by slopes44 on Aug 27, 2011 9:35 AM EDT via iPhone app up reply actions  

agree

The Dis-Assembly Line - The unofficial, official name for the next best D-line in football.

by rames on Aug 27, 2011 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

my bold prediction for the 53 man roster...

Not only does Ian Johnson find a way to make the roster, he single handedly leads us to a SB victory where we inevitably rush upon the field to purpose to him!

by slopes44 on Aug 27, 2011 12:52 PM EDT via iPhone app up reply actions  

The only change I would like to see is Ian Johnson making the roster

I have no idea who Jerome Harrison is, and don’t care much for Aaron Brown.

but that’s probably because Brown went to TCU. idk.

My grandfather was a Packers fan, my father is a Vikings fan, I am a Lions fan, and there is no way in hell I am raising a Bears fan.
Oh, and I hate the Philadelphia Eagles (but like the Phillies)

by tbl2020 on Aug 27, 2011 10:00 AM EDT reply actions  

as i said before the lions will add afew rbs from camp cuts also the lions might keep rudy niswanger as backup on offensive line beacuse he can play 3spots instead of 2spots licke 2of our backups from last year licke thomas also culbreath might macke roster as backup og /ot if the dont keppand extra offline men licke they did with fox last year then will be the 1st player on the pracice roster this year but with all the injureys this year to the offlisive line thet might keep an extra ot/og on the rosteer this year .

by kwfords on Aug 27, 2011 10:28 AM EDT reply actions  

I think you nailed it, Sean, and mcivor's practice squad looks good as well.

With three days left before the first cuts are made I think that there are only a couple of spots that could surprise. Here’s one of them:

SS Ricardo Silva beating out Erik Coleman

Silva has been a revelation in training camp and has produced good results during preseason games (a fumble recovery and an interception). Coleman has shown a propensity for being burned in run support and plays a too soft zone.

by mikeyclaw on Aug 27, 2011 10:37 AM EDT reply actions  

was thinking same thing

the 4th safety spot could still be won out by a strong preseason and camp performance by Silva.

 the only other question mark i see is on OLine How is Fox looking I know he’s still in boot or w/e but I wonder if this could be another roster spot for the O Line pending how far along his recovery is coming.

A coward dies a thousands Deaths a soldier dies once ....

by JaiGaiaAries on Aug 27, 2011 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

on 2 carries

they were nice, but not enough of a sample to make an evaluation…

It’s hard to tell if Linney isn’t giving Felton a chance because he know what Felton can do and that they will keep Felton (and use him more in the regular season – but don’t want to show their hand) or if Felton’s already as good as gone…

The Dis-Assembly Line - The unofficial, official name for the next best D-line in football.

by rames on Aug 27, 2011 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

I suspect

Gerberry makes the team and we say bye to Gandy. Gandy has not shown much and though Gerberry may not be an improvement he’s at least younger and cheaper.

Ah but I was so much older then and younger than right now

by Justan Oldfart on Aug 27, 2011 1:49 PM EDT reply actions  

I wonder what Flullens fate would be

if Fairley was healthy. Not sure the exact numbers, but isn’t he a little pricey for our 5th DT. I like his versatility, but wonder if he’s worth keeping a roster spot instead of younger developmental talent.

Guess it’s a moot point at the moment.

by slopes44 on Aug 27, 2011 2:15 PM EDT via iPhone app reply actions  

Its that versitility that gives him an edge

I do think we keep 9 DLineman and I do think that he will make it.

Go check out the Datsyukian Deke , Detroit Red Wings Blog
http://datsyukiandeke.wordpress.com/

by Detroitnr1 on Aug 27, 2011 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with you, but

At what point do we part with our 5th best DT, who, while versitale, will never be more then he is, when we can keep a guy who has a potential to develop into something more. It’s a fine line to walk and I’m not sure which side of the line is right. But, if it comes down to keeping flu or Houge/Culbreath, maybe even Callaway, I’d choose one of them. Flu isn’t the only one, I wonder about Ekejiuba as well. Though, at least he is a bit of a special teams ace.

Like I said, kind of a moot point with Fairley banged up, no way he gets cut… Yet!

by slopes44 on Aug 27, 2011 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Question

I know that Don Mulbach is good at what he does but cant we look and see if we can find a backup C or G that can do the same thing and open up a spot?

Go check out the Datsyukian Deke , Detroit Red Wings Blog
http://datsyukiandeke.wordpress.com/

by Detroitnr1 on Aug 27, 2011 3:27 PM EDT reply actions  

you would think

the funny thing is that most teams have a designated LS.

Yooperlionfan is officially "the man"
the Lions D-Line: the Four Horsemen of the A-sack-alypse
Jim Schwart: Erasing the stink of Millen, one fist pump at a time.
P.C.P: It is not just for recreation anymore.

by JCruize on Aug 27, 2011 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Truthfully

No. I’m sure we could find a backup WR who’s a really good punter too, but it makes no sense to. Fundamentally, Mulbach is as important to special teams performance as a punter is. He’s there for the same plays, his consistent good performance is critical to punts and field goals, etc.

by Mavyrk on Aug 28, 2011 3:04 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Dom

is our backup long snapper

Ah but I was so much older then and younger than right now

by Justan Oldfart on Aug 27, 2011 3:45 PM EDT reply actions  

I want to see more of Hughes before i write him off...

" Maybe for a writer...but i am sure most of you can tell i am not a writer". det32

by SmittyJ on Aug 27, 2011 6:30 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

That's a tough one

Vasher played well tonight and it wouldn’t hurt to keep him around with Alphonso Smith’s injury. I like Hogue but I think it might come down to who’s more valuable: A rookie linebacker, a veteran corner who has shown he can play, or possibly even a DE/DT hybrid that is Andre Flu? I think it’s a 3-way battle between those guys for a roster spot bc I don’t see Hogue making the team over a guy like Ekeijuba or Palmer

Watching #49 was a blast but now it's time for some #53

by TheForceOfFollett on Aug 28, 2011 12:38 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's blog that is your source for everything Detroit Lions.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Matthew Stafford & Will
Dylan_small
POD's Offseason Open Thread
Mikel-leshoure2_medium_small
Top 10 Fanpost!

Recent FanPosts

Small
Poll
Mikel-leshoure2_medium_small
AOL SportingNews' Bad Attempt At Ranking 32 NFL Coaches
Lion_facepalm_small
Last Rookie Contract numbers
Small
Bold predictions (offense)
Small
Broyles - Value AND Reach?
Small
All other fans hate and disrespect the Lions and their faithful fans (us)
Calvin_dallas_small
Stafford Stats Stand Strong
Desolationrowlarge_small
The 3-4 Look
Index_small
Calvin Johnson v.s. Fitzgerald
Small
Titus Young trade bait?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Pod_small Sean Yuille

Writers

Detroit-lions_small simscity

Untitled-2_small Latif Masud

41li1jpy5il Mavyrk