Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

How to improve our rush offense

Best is avg. 2.9 Harrison is avg. 2.9 Williams is avg. 2.5 Anyone who reads my posts knows I think Best is not a lead back, and is best being our change of pace back. I know he can "hit the homerun" but right now a lot of his carries seem to be shotgun draws up the middle. I'd rather see Harriosn or Williams getting a lot more carries to free Best up for more productive carries in the middle and toward the end of games. I'm really leaning on Williams getting 10-15 carries per game, he's more of type of back Leshoure would and been in our offense, and I think Schwartz is kinda in a funk on what to do with Leshoure injured right now. I hope we can all agree giving Best extra carries right now is not the answer to Leshoure being injured. So my plan would be simple, Williams getting the bulk of the carries in the 1st quarter and increasing Best role as the games wears on. Harrison and Morris would fight for carries after that, just so we are all aware Morris has 4 carries for 0 yards thus far this year. I know were getting by with our rushing attack right now but that is gonna change the more the Lions get noticed and that's about to be pretty quick in the next few weeks, better start now rather then have this be the biggest topic of conversation which will happen if Linny and Schwartz don't at least put a little fear in teams that we can move the ball on the ground...



This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Pride of Detroit or its writers. FanPosts are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable fans.

Comment 43 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Don't worry about it.

I never valued running backs too much. It’s all about the guys protecting them. But if nothing’s working, might as well try anything.

We have our man. It's Stafford. It's Suh. It's Calvin. It's Delmas. What we need is Man Number Two to stand up.

by halfbackattack33 on Sep 28, 2011 8:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

if best hits a couple 40 yard

home runs in the next couple weeks I think this won’t matter. Its a small sample size. If we take best off the field our screen game takes a hit as well as our check down game. Best may bot be a top 10 rusher in the league but his value to this offense is a lot like the value of McCoy in Philly in my opinion.

I have a 9" personality

by Waitingfortheroar on Sep 28, 2011 6:26 PM EDT reply actions  

We had mostly bad playcalling last week

Some more screens and runs to the outside for best will give us a decent run game

Go check out the Datsyukian Deke , Detroit Red Wings Blog
http://datsyukiandeke.wordpress.com/

by Detroitnr1 on Sep 28, 2011 7:07 PM EDT reply actions  

All thoughs screens will be there later in games

Teams are getting used to knowing Best will get the ball from a draw out of the shot gun formation…

I don’t watch enough Philly games but he has to take the ball from some different formations than Best does…

Again look at his 2.9 yard per carry, I’m not a big fan of stats. But rather the eye ball test, were just not moving the ball well on the ground right now… I know I will take some heat on that comment but it’s the truth…

by msivits on Sep 28, 2011 7:29 PM EDT reply actions  

we absolutlely

Arent. But, the more we feed TEs in the seams and hit over the top routes we hit the more screens and draws will hit for big plays.

I have a 9" personality

by Waitingfortheroar on Sep 28, 2011 8:49 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Yep...

We took only 1 shot deep in the first half.. I think Schawtz realized that it was silly to not… so, I would assume we pepper in deep balls though out the game, for the rest of season.

All men are created equal. Its just that some men are more equal than others....

by CapitolLions on Sep 29, 2011 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

i dont know that any other back would have been much better

With that handoff out of shotgun. It is not my favorite play but
Then again having him there helped free grew, who helped free Titus who helped free cj…or you know having to account for all those guys

by BillySimsMadeMeDo on Sep 28, 2011 7:47 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

thats

My view on it also. If they have to account for Best every play, its essentially already accomplishing what a quallity running game does.

I have a 9" personality

by Waitingfortheroar on Sep 28, 2011 8:51 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I think Williams would get more yards in those situation because he is more of a power back

and instead of getting -1 yard or 0 yards you would get 3 or 4 yards…. and that may not be breath taking but it is a better down and distance ratio that getting nothing… just my opinion…

Plus if you look at K. Williams … Mike Shannhan always goes thru alot of runners.. when many thought K. Williams would end up as their main guy… and to be honest he could have been. It was just that he could not carry mcnabb… then again neither would best.

by Shankdiddy on Sep 28, 2011 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

but if it's the shot gun formation with that delay or immediate handoff

do you think the d respects Williams the same as a receiver?

I could see if we are in some power run formation, although I’d still like to see Best prove himself to be an everydown back

by BillySimsMadeMeDo on Sep 29, 2011 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

To me we need to use them based on their displayed skill set...it is a dream to just believe someone just turns into a good runner

even with some offensive line issues you have to want your runners to make some plays on their own. This isn’t a NEW pattern.. i remember a game like this vs Buffalo when best has 20 yards on 14 carriers and sometimes runners have that. But where is the balance?

All i am saying is i look at Best as a Matt Forte type… good in the passing game and good situationally but not a guy you expect to feed the rock too. In my humble opinion K williams would give us the best chance to have a decent running attack as the guy who we use on running downs and Best as that 3rd down type back… with Harrision and Mo Mo spelling…. just my humble opinion that would help with SOME of the issue.

by Shankdiddy on Sep 28, 2011 8:55 PM EDT reply actions  

I know it is college, but did you see Best at Cal?

he was carrying the rock not just catching it. Having him in just on third downs
seems kind of like leaving your best frozen beer mug in the freezer so you can drink
beer from the can…

by BillySimsMadeMeDo on Sep 29, 2011 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

This may run counter to intuition

but my take is that we should not start the game trying to establish the run. Let Stafford get in throws on first and 10 to begin. Let him build a rhythm. It won’t take long. Once he does, then throw in different running plays to throw the D even more off balance.

by jimoska on Sep 28, 2011 9:48 PM EDT reply actions  

As long as we're not down 20.

I’m all for running the ball, even if they are for little to no gains.

"You've got to respect your opponent, no matter who it is. You respect him best by going out there and beating him up." - Calvin Johnson

by Mavyrk on Sep 28, 2011 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jim, I was thinking the exact same thing during the Minnesota game.

Use the pass to set up the run. It would seem to play to our strength.

Did you guys see the size of that chicken?

by studmo on Sep 29, 2011 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

what about some new 2 TE and 3 TE sets that help establish the run

I mean thats what they are there for as well and Detroit is suppose to have 3 w/ 2 capable of blocking in Grew and Heller. Id actually like to see a little more motions and utilizing the full teams depth to help make anything happen in the run game. A lil more helping between the tackle and guard or center and guard .. got to get creative I think but I also still believe this is all part of scheme (Linehans) as well and why there is such a low expectation in terms of its use. His history shows the best runner he had was S. Jackson in St Louis and then you have players like Best and Culpepper who are in the top 5 rushers under his system.

At same time I think the answer is also already here on the team. Best should not be considered the every down back they want him to be. Situational at best (no puns intended) and I think to get those big gains we saw in him at first as a rookie they need less of him on the field trying to pound the ball. Wear down the defense a bit before punching them back in the throat w/ Best speed. Harrison, Williams and Morris need to step it up completely. 2-3 yds isnt much and eventually your going to get 5-10 yard gain .. but as someone said some of this is on the RB’s to make happen regardless of how bad the line may be playing. I know we have seen it w/ each back, seems like all they do is run right into the offensive line period, and rarely look for the holes and most times when they do, they somehow trip up a lot or you got tigger action and everyone trying to bounce … Right into a group of defenders …Yikes …

by JaiGaiaAries on Sep 28, 2011 10:33 PM EDT reply actions  

I think sometimes fans miss the point

It’s not always about what the player does but what they can possible do. Best puts us in a situation where he can break a long run, catch a screen or swing pass and turn it into a game changing play or have Stafford fake the hand off to him and create passing mismatches downfield by bringing the Linebackers up.

The Defense has to account for Best when he is on the field, with the other backs they don’t. They can contain those guys with their base sets and not really worry about the big play as much. The flip side of that is if you run in someone else to run the ball, the defense will key on that guy. Best just needs to get his reps and make the most of them until his true average catches up. He will break a few long runs to average out with his shorter ones. Hell, he might get a few long ones this week with the depleted Cowboys secondary having a true passing team for the first time. If this was week 8 I would say we should worry, but for right now I’m cool with Best being an every down back.

by ncbur10 on Sep 28, 2011 11:36 PM EDT reply actions  

OK, I am going to say this again, because some folks don't get it.

Just because the ball is delivered to the quarterback in a shotgun DOES NOT make the play a draw when he hands of the ball. I am so fricking sick of hearing that crap because it is just ignorant about football.

A draw play is characterized by the offensive line using a pass blocking scheme despite the play being a run. It is the exact opposite of a play action pass where the line will run block even though the run is faked and the quarterback passes the ball.

Most of the hand offs to Best DO NOT use pass blocking. They are mainly a variety of counters and traps. Get your head out of your bum and stop calling the run plays a draw just because the snap is delivered in a shotgun. How the ball is snapped has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the type of play you are running.

I never met him, but he was family to me... R.I.P. Tom Kowalski We will all miss you.

by TuffLynx on Sep 28, 2011 11:37 PM EDT reply actions  

o.k.

Put me down...Lions win at least 11 games next season! 1/6/11

by LonnieLion on Sep 29, 2011 12:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Draw play or not

Stafford takes the ball out of the Shotgun waits a hot second then shoves it in Best gut then best takes off in which ever direction he has a crease in. That done what seems to be 7-10 times a game is not smart football rather crossing your fingers hoping Best breaks one to the house…

by msivits on Sep 29, 2011 6:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

it looks delayed and has a different momentum

then the typical run up the gut, left or right type play

they could be like body blows softening up for the knockout
it just seems like Ol’ Scotty sticks with it and takes his time setting those up
so that watching them live they seem a little like wasted plays

can’t argue with 3-0 though

by BillySimsMadeMeDo on Sep 29, 2011 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, that is true.

The shotgun plays a role in the perception of a delay because the ball is handed off so deep in the backfield. In that sense I can agree that it is a delayed counter or delayed trap that is being run, and that could be part of the problem. I really would like to see Stafford go back under center for the snap.

I never met him, but he was family to me... R.I.P. Tom Kowalski We will all miss you.

by TuffLynx on Sep 29, 2011 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fucking +1 on that

Stafford in Shotgun way too much…

by msivits on Sep 29, 2011 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree, for a couple of reasons.

Handing off the ball out of the shotgun is a difficult proposition. As I mentioned, your running back is so deep that they take a long time to hit the hole. The benefit of the QB being under center is the running back can gain forward momentum while the quarterback is turning to hand off the ball. It makes the hand off a little more difficult because the running back is moving when they take it, but the running back does not have to wait to get the ball before they start running, so they hit the hole a bit quicker and make the job of run blocking easier because of that.

Maybe the Lions should experiment with the short shotgun that is used in the Pistol offense. That is a decent compromise because the running back can still get a running start and the QB is a couple steps behind the center to start. I think that would be a good compromise between the long shotgun they use now and moving Stafford back under center.

I never met him, but he was family to me... R.I.P. Tom Kowalski We will all miss you.

by TuffLynx on Sep 29, 2011 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oops, I forgot to mention the second thing...

When you hand off the ball so deep it gives the defense more time to recognize a play action fake before the running back hits the line. That split second is often all the defense needs to readjust themselves. By giving the hand off closer to the line, it forces the defense to commit to defend the run more quickly which will make play action more effective in my mind.

I never met him, but he was family to me... R.I.P. Tom Kowalski We will all miss you.

by TuffLynx on Sep 29, 2011 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes

I’ve been waiting to see the Pistol more. They debuted it a bit last year. Maybe they’re holding off on it for certain situations or something, but I’m a fan. hope to see it in Dallas.

The Dis-Assembly Line - The unofficial, official name for the next best D-line in football.

by rames on Sep 29, 2011 11:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

The o line seems to get pushed back at the point of attack.

It’s hard for anyone not named Barry Sanders to overcome this kind of a definciency.

Did you guys see the size of that chicken?

by studmo on Sep 29, 2011 12:11 AM EDT reply actions  

*Deficiency*

Did you guys see the size of that chicken?

by studmo on Sep 29, 2011 12:13 AM EDT reply actions  

My take and um....I vote myself the winner.

Remember when San Diego had Tomlinson and Sproles. Tomlinson was 1st, 2nd down back that could catch and sproles was 3rd down , pass catching "specialist. Not saying by any stretch Williams is LT, BUT, he is a “running” back, which allows us to truly decieve defense. Best plays off that as reciever or an effective draw play because D thinks he’s there to catch ball. It’s all about fooling the defense and I think right now our running game is too predictable.

Put me down...Lions win at least 11 games next season! 1/6/11

by LonnieLion on Sep 29, 2011 12:15 AM EDT reply actions  

good points for sure!

The Dis-Assembly Line - The unofficial, official name for the next best D-line in football.

by rames on Sep 29, 2011 11:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Barry Sanders could not run behind this o-line.

by HouseofSpartans on Sep 29, 2011 9:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Hold on playa.

Hoooooold on.

Hold the damn phone.

You go to your room, young man. No.

"You've got to respect your opponent, no matter who it is. You respect him best by going out there and beating him up." - Calvin Johnson

by Mavyrk on Sep 29, 2011 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Hahah

Barry could run behind no line.he did for years!

by Michael21 on Sep 29, 2011 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

90s

Barry had a very good O-line in the early 90s before tragedy hit it in Utley and Andolsek. Both were very good, combined with two pro-bowlers in Brown and Glover.

They just were not the massive line that was in Dallas, which got all the publicity (as did the team in general).

What Barry missed all those years was a good QB and headcoach.

by Incantrix on Sep 29, 2011 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Williams will get more carries....

he is still getting comfortable the O and Schwartz doesn’t want to push it to the point where the possibility of a back breaking mistake or miscue could occur. I did like that 3rd and short run he pulled off last week. I’m thinking we can expect to see some more of that.

"They counted on America to be passive...They counted wrong." ~ R. Reagan

by Roughneck 7 on Sep 29, 2011 2:27 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm all for getting Williams involved

However, we need to get him on the field more in passing situations. Otherwise, the D will be all like, “Yo dogg, there is that Williams kid again. Let’s go tackle him.” “I smell what you’re stepping in valued teammate. I will follow you. Homie.” Those are direct quotes, obviously.

It's turkey, Lions and Macy's. Any other combination is just ludicrous.

"Only a real man quotes himself in the 3rd person" - Nate D. circa 2011

"Ambition is a poor excuse for not having sense enough to be lazy." - Charlie McCarthy

by Leonuro on Sep 29, 2011 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

obviously

and concure!

The Dis-Assembly Line - The unofficial, official name for the next best D-line in football.

by rames on Sep 29, 2011 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

concur

The Dis-Assembly Line - The unofficial, official name for the next best D-line in football.

by rames on Sep 29, 2011 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's blog that is your source for everything Detroit Lions.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Matthew Stafford & Will
Dylan_small
POD's Offseason Open Thread
Mikel-leshoure2_medium_small
Top 10 Fanpost!

Recent FanPosts

Small
Poll
Mikel-leshoure2_medium_small
AOL SportingNews' Bad Attempt At Ranking 32 NFL Coaches
Lion_facepalm_small
Last Rookie Contract numbers
Small
Bold predictions (offense)
Small
Broyles - Value AND Reach?
Small
All other fans hate and disrespect the Lions and their faithful fans (us)
Calvin_dallas_small
Stafford Stats Stand Strong
Desolationrowlarge_small
The 3-4 Look
Index_small
Calvin Johnson v.s. Fitzgerald
Small
Titus Young trade bait?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Pod_small Sean Yuille

Writers

Detroit-lions_small simscity

Untitled-2_small Latif Masud

41li1jpy5il Mavyrk