Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Defensive backs - Is it really as big an issue like it is made to be?

Hello everyone,

Been reading the POD for the past several years and I have to attest this is the best source of information for my lions by loyal fans. I finally decided to commit and sign up. Like a lot of the people my age, I became a lions fan after watching Barry Sanders in TV and on the field. Always rooted for them and am really proud and happy with what they have done in the last couple of seasons.

Now coming to my headline. I strongly feel our defensive backs are not an issue. If you look at the first half of the season, the defense dominated and was a top 10 in the league. This was because the front four were generating the pressure and DBs were not required to cover for long time. If a DB is expected to cover longer or against strong armed QB, there will be plays made by the opponents. In the second half of the season, most teams have had enough films to slice and dice our front four and find enough weaknesses to exploit. This led to the above situation with DBs having to cover for long or having to face more big play situations. Also when he was healthy, Wright wasn't targeted much. Most QBs respected him.

Overall, I am not sure if they scheme will change or if the Lions will mix it up next year. But except for depth, I don't think we have any issues with out DBs. If we pick a CB in the first couple of rounds, I think we will be set.

Also, I think the focus should be replenishing the O line. Every one bashes the O Line, but I think they were pretty good this year. While they did a great job of protecting Stafford (how could he have thrown 5000+ yards without protection from this line?). The issue here is run support. We need a road grade guard (to push Peterman) or a center like Brewster to succeed Riola (God bless his heart..but he is getting old and is not going to help the run game). We also need that elusive franchise LOT (some one like Mike Adams who might be available in the first round at 23). What do y'all think?

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Pride of Detroit or its writers. FanPosts are valued expressions of opinion by passionate and knowledgeable fans.

Comment 37 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

well you answered your own question

our DBs looked good when our line made them look good. And if your suggesting that instead of drafting a db, we should draft a better D line… Well lets just say i will go ballistic if we pass on another sweet cb (Cough Prince Cough) and draft a rotational DT.

by Joel Korson on Jan 10, 2012 10:33 PM EST reply actions  

Re: well you answered your own question

Hey Joel, I don’t think we need any addition to the DL as we have enough talent there. Old Gun will come up with something to fix the D line in 2012. The only change that would be a great additon there will be is Jim Washburn as the D line coach. I hope he lands up here now that the eagles defensive coordinator position is about to change.

Its the O line that needs attention as its getting old and is unable to open running lanes (although Backus and Sims are better). This is one group where the average age in the team is really high. We need to find successors ( I won’t say replacements) for Backus and Raiola. Peterman is OK..but we needed a Davis to get him to perform. Gos has been the most polarizing OT out there…sometimes he is lights out and sometimes he is below average. I don’t know if he will be replaced..I am excited about Fox (hope he comes back healthy and takes up what is his).

by MotownMauler on Jan 10, 2012 11:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Our awful run game is a bigger problem than our pass defense.

We had a pitiful run game all year. Our DBs did get shredded at the end of the season but that was after we had key injuries to Houston and Delmas. That tells me our biggest problem with the secondary is depth. We can afford to pick 2nd-5th round DBs. The OL needs an immediate upgrade.

Unless you think that Leshoure is going to solve all our problems, we need to go OL. The only other options I would be happy with is trading down or if a top DB talent drops to us at 23.

by ziggyz on Jan 10, 2012 11:13 PM EST reply actions  

I agree

The OL complements the run game. We did have an awful running game this year both because of injuries to the featured backs and because of lack of support from the OL for backups (Smith, Momo and KWill). I am not sure about how Leshoure will turn out after his injury. Best is one concussion away from retirement. Momo will probably be gone next year. They might invest another year with KWill. He used to be a beast out of HS but injuries killed his college. Lets hope he had a sophomore slump. With Best, Leshoure, Smith backed by Bell and KWill, I hope we could rotate and have a decent run game (100-120 yds per game) if the O Line can open paths for them. Both CJ nad Burleson are good blocking receivers…all we need is the route and burst…burst we have paths are closed though :)

by MotownMauler on Jan 10, 2012 11:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Mostly agree

I could also see us grabbing a DE or LB if a top-tier player falls to us. While I think we will use the other rounds of the draft a little more based on need, I think in the first round we will stick with the plan of just drafting whoever has the most talent when we are on the clock (excluding QB only).

by Adam Keith on Jan 11, 2012 10:07 AM EST up reply actions  

I was talking about OL vs DB.

But you’re right. If any elite talent other than a QB or DT falls to 23 we should pick them. I just view elite OL or elite DB as the most likely to be available and the most desirous.

This is how I view it:
Elite OL>Elite DB> Elite Other>Top Tier OL>Trade Down>Top Tier DB>Top Tier Other>Etc.

by ziggyz on Jan 11, 2012 11:54 AM EST up reply actions  

I think our top 3 CBs are fine

Wright, Houston, and Berry are as good as most NFL teams have. When they were healthy the secondary played pretty well. The problems came when they got hurt and we had to play Brandon McDonald and Alphonzo Smith.

Brandon McDonald looked very good in training camp and had seemingly won one of the top three spots. Then Berry jumped him on the depth chart and he said some things online that got him in trouble. Everything seemed to go downhill between him and the Lions after that. He was eventually released and the only reason he is back is because of injuries. I do not expect the Lions to keep him over the long term.

It is clear that Alphonzo Smith is a one trick pony. If he doesn’t make the pick, he becomes a big liability. It is clear that the Lions coaches have talked to him about aspects of his game that they want him to work on and he is not taking the coaching well. His battles with Gunny and Jim Schwartz are going to put him out of the picture for next season, I believe. Just as an aside, Alphonzo Smith gave up five touchdowns in the games against the Chargers, Packers, and Saints at the end of the season. That is more than any other Lions cornerback.

I expect the Lions to replace those two corner positions for next season. It is clear that they must upgrade the talent coming off the bench. That may also extend to Chris Harris at safety, since he did not play as well as the coached probably expected when Delmas was out

I do not have a clear read on the Chris Harris situation. I like Harris personally, but he seems to have lost a step as a player. Of course, that could just be a slight delay from his not being familiar with the Lions system. I expect that he will be in camp because he has a cap friendly contract, but he may not be able to hold his roster spot if the Lions are looking to upgrade the position.

Listen to the Two Bro's Talk podcast!

by TuffLynx on Jan 11, 2012 12:32 AM EST reply actions  

I think Harris is OK as a backup.

Not a solution as a starter though. We need some mid-round draft picks at CB to add depth and to develop into starters.

by ziggyz on Jan 11, 2012 12:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Harris was a bandaid... nothing more.

He will not be on the Lions roster next year.

http://twitter.com/#!/rumbulls

by CLF on Jan 11, 2012 11:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Re: I think our top 3 CBs are fine

My thoughts exactly. Brandon is a goner for sure and Phonz screwed the pooch through his jawing with old man Gun on the sidelines and by giving that interception ball to Schwartz in that GBP game. I feel they will find a mid round safety and promote Silva to get more snaps. He has the size and attitude to be a decent DB and they say it takes 3 seasons for a DB to mature. Like Willie young on the D line…I feel Silva will end up as the surprise late pick to become a starter or rotation player…Also like you said, Berry has a lot of upside and is only one step away (becoming a ball hawk) from becoming a complete CB. He was pretty good in college and went undrafted because of off the field issues. Gun seems to have taken a special interest in him and he seems like one of Gun’s side project.

Harris will probably be gone before the regular season starts in 2012. He was brought here because of our depth issues (Eric Colemen’s injury) and if Coleman is healthy…he will be a front runner compared to Harris because he has a better cap friendly contract ($765K compared to Harris’s 2 yr 3.5 mill…we picked him from the waiver wire remember?). Both their contracts end in 2011 and are free agents for 2012. I guess they will go with Eric Coleman…

by MotownMauler on Jan 11, 2012 2:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Harris needs to go

I liked Coleman better, though not by much. I’d just love to see a decently high round CB pick and a middle-grade vet CB brought in to fill Phonze and Mcdonald’s spots.

The boys are back in town!

by rames on Jan 11, 2012 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Personally

I think our smaller but quick CBs work. The issue is when we put 5-11 Delmas or Spievey on a 6-5 TE. That is the issue. I know I been harping on this issue for a while but it bears repeating we need a bigger Safety to deal with those type of players. Outside of that one issue I am satisfied with our DBs for the starters. Our roatational and backups well they can and should be replaced.

by MisterEK on Jan 11, 2012 3:24 AM EST reply actions  

The bigger safety

would have to also be AT LEAST as fast, and have ball skilz to be better than Del or Spievey….So we’re talking about a top teir S (1st or 2nd round or pay good $ for a FA)

The boys are back in town!

by rames on Jan 11, 2012 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Okay, lets look at the teams we faced in the first eight games.

TB, KC, Minn, Dallas, Chicago, SF, Atl, Denver. Five of those teams are very poor passing teams. Dallas shredded the Lions through the air until Romo threw three picks in the second half. Cutler kept his team in a game they had no business being in, and Ryan had some big passing plays when he needed them.

The last eight games were a different story; Chicago, Carolina, Green Bay, New Orleans, Minnesota, Oakland, San Diego, and Green Bay, then New Orleans again. Everyone of those QBs torched us. Even the Minnesota QBs had numerous big plays in the air and on the ground before the Lions pulled it out. Rivers moved the ball very well through the air against us too.

And the performance had nothing to do with D Line pressure [which was sub par all year] but with the quality of the QBs we faced.

"I’m sorry for all the people who want us to run the ball 40 times a game, but we’re going to put the ball in No. 9’s hands and he’s going to make plays for us like he did today," Lions coach Jim Schwartz said. Amen to that Jim!

by NorthLeft12 on Jan 11, 2012 10:27 AM EST reply actions  

Quality of QB

I think it is less quality and more the new ruleset the NFL is using.

When a backup QB can come into his 2nd start in the NFL and set a franchise record for passing, something is wrong with the picture. They are turning the NFL into Arena football.

Our DBs are adequately fine as a whole, we have skill and speed. We upgraded over last year. All of our problems come from our formations. You cannot play a deep zone on every play and expect to stop either the run or the pass. Watch were our damn CBs line up on recievers, 10 yrds downfield <—— Even on 3rd and 5, still 10 yrds downfield. Someone mentioned our run def suffered when Wright and Delmas were hurt. I’m sorry, but if your DBs have to stop the run, you’re already in trouble.

Zone can no longer work in the NFL with the defenseless reciever rule. Recievers used to get pummeled over the middle, making them skittish. Now its 15 yrds even if they drop the ball. This is the main reason TEs are flourishing now. They can run the middle endlessly open because no one wants the penalty AND ensuing FINE, but I won’t even go there.

This leaves only 1 option, you MUST get pressure on the QB. I’m not keen on the new NFL and generally only watch 1/2 games anymore. I remember the days of defense, there really is none anymore and it is just not football.

by Incantrix on Jan 11, 2012 11:06 AM EST up reply actions  

NorthLeft

I too was going to mention the harder schedule in the later part of the season. And of course the injuries. I also agree with the general premise that our top 3 CBs are serviceable, but I still would support picking up a corner in the draft.

Other than secondary, the O Line has to be the priority. While they did a pretty good job with pass protection, particularly in the second half, we don’t have the push to have a decent running game. And they are aging. We also didn’t have much depth at Oline and were an injury away from disaster.

Lion fan in the Great Land!

by AlaskaLion on Jan 12, 2012 2:29 AM EST up reply actions  

I love the Lions

and I am generally the optimist. I even told people that I thought we were going to upset the Saints. But I remember an ex-GM that once said “If you think you are one or two players away, you are most likely 4-5 players away.” So if a Lions fan thinks we are 3-4 players away from a title, they probably need to adjust to the idea that we are 8-9 players away. In my opinion, the true answer to your question is that if Houston is the biggest db on our roster and we don’t have two cb’s on the roster better than him or Wright, our D will not be able to take a front tier offense off the field consistently. Like wise, If Dom and Backus are our cornerstones of the line, we will not be able to keep a top tier offense off the field enough.

This, IMO, is why Bellicheck stockpiles 2nd round picks all the time. With aging of players and cap issues you simply must bring in way more talent than average teams do to be a consistent winner. As a side note, I love Houston and Wright but they are simply not big enough to be effective through 16-19 games. They can’t take the beatings and a db can’t cover anyone when they are all banged up.

by Lionsickness on Jan 11, 2012 10:34 AM EST reply actions  

Stockpiling picks

Bill’s draft record is crap, even with a million picks.

by Incantrix on Jan 11, 2012 11:08 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

not sure where you get your information from

but out of 22 starters I think all but 4 are either patriot draft pics our udfa’s? Maybe they don’t start a lot of first rounders but I always attribute that to trading back to stock up picks. Draft position is overrated anyway. All that matters is if they can play. Like W. Young and T Brady.

by Lionsickness on Jan 11, 2012 5:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Recked you Incantrix.

Look at the Patriot drafts from 2006 to 2009. Terrible.

Thirty-nine 39 picks, fourteen in the first three rounds, with Gostkowski, Mayo, Chung, Vollmer, and Edelman the only players left that are contributing to the Pats.

His 2010 draft looks good right now, but lets see after the end of 2012 how many are left.

"I’m sorry for all the people who want us to run the ball 40 times a game, but we’re going to put the ball in No. 9’s hands and he’s going to make plays for us like he did today," Lions coach Jim Schwartz said. Amen to that Jim!

by NorthLeft12 on Jan 12, 2012 7:37 AM EST up reply actions  

We still are missing a #1 guy...

Subtract Wright and Add a true #1 and our DB’s are okay.

I really want a bigger center and RG.

The biggest thing for this team is staying healthy and adding quality depth.

by Veihl789 on Jan 11, 2012 10:48 AM EST reply actions  

I see the Lions looking for a Big Safety and taller Cornerbacks.

As the NFL keeps moving towards passing… the Offenses do so by having taller/bigger WRs.

Defenses will and should start moving to a 3 safety Defense… Tampa 2 already uses the MLBer in the deep zone. Furthermore, the upcoming drafted CornerBacks will need to be Taller and bigger, 40 times won’t be as important. (See Seattle’s secondary for an example of large cornerbacks).

http://twitter.com/#!/rumbulls

by CLF on Jan 11, 2012 11:25 AM EST reply actions  

disagree that 40 times won't be as important

Because these taller WRs and new breed of TEs seem to run very fast. You need defenders who can match up, but that doesn’t mean they’ll be able to match up if they’re not a new breed of bigger, yet faster DB…

The boys are back in town!

by rames on Jan 11, 2012 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

So you're saying...

A team would take a shorter faster, smaller corner over a bigger, taller, slower CB?

We’ll agree to disagree.

http://twitter.com/#!/rumbulls

by CLF on Jan 11, 2012 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

It depends what kind of defense you're running.

If a team is going with the type of defense CLF is advocating, with 3 deep safetys, they don’t need as much speed at corner because on every throw there will be deep safety help.

I’m not convinced that NFL defenses will be abandoning the Cover 2 anytime soon, but if they do, putting a bigger premium on size over speed makes sense.

by ziggyz on Jan 11, 2012 1:46 PM EST up reply actions  

the lions will draft taller and biger cb //ss //fs when the collage coach es start playing them thier its hard to draft big taller cb when thier our verry few to draft . the same goes for ss /fs in collage yes the seattle secondary has large cbs but it spent alot of draft picks in the last 3drafts to get them and they it on a few of the bigher cbs that they drafted and lost on some picks that the way drafting goes .most collage coaches tacke players who our 6ft and up and add weight to them to macke them weack side olb or stong side de to rush the qcb .my point if you tacke a lock at all players in collage football most cbs our under 6ft and ss //fs our just 6ft or biger so findig one who cant mack your roster is tough just tacke a lock how manny get evear year .

by kwfords on Jan 11, 2012 12:30 PM EST reply actions  

I hear what you're saying.... I'm not saying its gonna be easy

But I also think that the Taller/Bigger “unknowns” will be had in the late round of the draft.

Seattle has a bunch of young Secondary that will be a force to recon with in years to come… Alot of people hate on Pete, but as soon as he gets a decent QB… San Francisco will have a fight on their hands.

http://twitter.com/#!/rumbulls

by CLF on Jan 11, 2012 12:53 PM EST up reply actions  

What?
but as soon as he gets a decent QB

You don’t think Tarvaris “Jump Pass” Jackson and Charlie “Clipboard Jesus” Whitehurst are decent? For shame.

It's turkey, Lions and Macy's. Any other combination is just ludicrous.

Twitter is for pussies. I follow people in real life.

"Ambition is a poor excuse for not having sense enough to be lazy." - Charlie McCarthy

by Leonuro on Jan 11, 2012 6:38 PM EST up reply actions  

lol

http://twitter.com/#!/rumbulls

by CLF on Jan 12, 2012 7:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Speaking of QB...

Not sure where Cousins ranks… but seems he’d be a steal as a 3rd rounder.

http://twitter.com/#!/rumbulls

by CLF on Jan 12, 2012 7:15 AM EST up reply actions  

There's an old football adage.

You can never have enough DBs. Particularly not in this pass happy league. While I agree that it’s not a great need to the level of our OL, it’s a big enough deal that spending a first rounder on a CB (via BPA) isn’t out of the question.

Unfortunately the way the draft works, if you’re just spending your picks sequentially by need, you’re going to wind up reaching on most of your choices. A top tier talent CB + a second round talent OG or OC is way better than a high second round worthy OG/OC and a high third round CB, basically.

Is our secondary “good enough”? Yeah, when everyone’s healthy on defense and having a good day, sure. Can it get better? Absolutely! Honestly, I see us drafting a DB in perpetuity from this point on (provided we have the picks to do so), because you really can never have enough; even if they’re late round picks or just ST aces.

Also, regarding the whole fast/tall thing, the unfortunate issue is those kinds of players are scouted on offense at a premium, even if they have stone hands (see also: Bryant Johnson). While they’d make great DBs, players of that ilk are always point scorers, which poses an interesting dilemma. That is, of course, outside of the rare Revis-types who play a lot bigger than they are.

"You've got to respect your opponent, no matter who it is. You respect him best by going out there and beating him up." - Calvin Johnson

by Mavyrk on Jan 11, 2012 9:03 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Agree with you Mav about looking at more than just a players numbers.

Especially, WRs. Two of the most critical skills for a WR are catching the ball and getting open. Those are skills that the scouts need to see for themselves in game situations. Titus Young is a case in point. The guy is not very big, nor does he have great straight line speed. But all I heard about him during Senior Bowl week was that he could get good separation from any CB and he was catching anything that got near him. That’s what we ended up seeing in the NFL too.

Also, I don’t see the Lions bypassing more talented players [in the first round mainly] to fill supposed needs. That is not what Mayhew does. While there are a few positions they won’t touch in the first round [TE, QB, RB, DT, K/P IMO] I think the rest are open for selection and will depend on the talent level available.
This team still needs good, young players at almost every position.

"I’m sorry for all the people who want us to run the ball 40 times a game, but we’re going to put the ball in No. 9’s hands and he’s going to make plays for us like he did today," Lions coach Jim Schwartz said. Amen to that Jim!

by NorthLeft12 on Jan 12, 2012 7:50 AM EST up reply actions  

To be honest.

If Trent Richardson fell to 23, I’d take him. He looks every bit as good as AP did coming out of college.

"You've got to respect your opponent, no matter who it is. You respect him best by going out there and beating him up." - Calvin Johnson

by Mavyrk on Jan 12, 2012 9:34 AM EST up reply actions  

I hope that is not put to the test.

Although I recall a mock draft or two which had him falling to the early twenties. It just seems that would be a bit of overkill, although we do have a lot of question marks among our RBs.

"I’m sorry for all the people who want us to run the ball 40 times a game, but we’re going to put the ball in No. 9’s hands and he’s going to make plays for us like he did today," Lions coach Jim Schwartz said. Amen to that Jim!

by NorthLeft12 on Jan 12, 2012 10:50 AM EST up reply actions  

i want holsey out of VA Tech

in the second. hes a strong corner who reminds me of a mix of houston and wright. extremely fast

"If you don't invest very much, then defeat doesn't hurt very much and winning is not very exciting." ~Dick Vermeil

"Some people watch adult videos on their computer. I go to YouTube and watch Jahvid Best highlight clips. That's what gets me aroused." ~Jim Schwartz

by DylanD on Jan 12, 2012 4:41 PM EST reply actions  

No, I don't think it's as bad as people are making it out to be.

I’m of the opinion that we need a true no. 1 CB, and that’s about it. Wright is more suited to play Nickelback, and Houston has always been a no. 2 masquerading as a no. 1 out of to necessity. Berry and Phonz could be solid depth at fourth and fifth on the depth chart.

I thought for sure we’d be able to get that guy with Cortland Finnegan, thinking that he would want to follow Schwartz, KVB and Tully over here from Tennessee, and seeing as the Titans seem to have little to no interest in bringing him back, but this possibly not reputable source makes it sound as though he would be more inclined to follow Jeff Fisher over to the Rams. I can’t for the life of me picture him wanting to join the lowly Rams over the playoff Lions, but it is what it is.

I really don’t see Safety as an issue. Delmas is, of course, a motherfucking beast, and while Spievey can be inconsistent as hell, he still looked much better this year then he did last season, and I don’t see why he won’t continue to improve, particularly when you consider that he’s still trying to learn the Safety position after converting from CB.

So… yeah. We need a true number one CB, which I’m hoping we can do with Finnegan. If we can’t, and if he does follow Fisher to St. Louis, then maybe we spend an early pick on a CB… if the value is right.

by motown313 on Jan 13, 2012 11:19 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Pride of Detroit, SB Nation's blog that is your source for everything Detroit Lions.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Matthew Stafford & Will
Dylan_small
POD's Offseason Open Thread
Mikel-leshoure2_medium_small
Top 10 Fanpost!

Recent FanPosts

Small
Martin Mayhew - One Question
Small
NEED YOUR HELP!!!!
Small
Poll
Mikel-leshoure2_medium_small
AOL SportingNews' Bad Attempt At Ranking 32 NFL Coaches
Lion_facepalm_small
Last Rookie Contract numbers
Small
Bold predictions (offense)
Small
Broyles - Value AND Reach?
Small
All other fans hate and disrespect the Lions and their faithful fans (us)
Calvin_dallas_small
Stafford Stats Stand Strong
Desolationrowlarge_small
The 3-4 Look

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Pod_small Sean Yuille

Writers

Detroit-lions_small simscity

Untitled-2_small Latif Masud

41li1jpy5il Mavyrk