NFL Could Give Some Officials Full-Time Status Next Season
There have always been bad calls in the NFL, but the 2011 season has seemed to have set a record for the number of complains about officiating from week to week. It seems as though you can't watch a game without seeing some blatantly missed call, especially when the Detroit Lions are involved.
In response to all of the bad calls, fans have called for changes to be made with officiating, as well as the rules. While it seemed like nothing would change, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell said on Sunday that the league is going to consider making some referees full-time employees next season.
''Consistency is exactly what every club wants, and I think every fan wants. You want consistency in the way rules are applied,'' Goodell said. ''We are contemplating this offseason taking some of those officials from the field who are now part time - they have other jobs - and making a certain number of them, let's say 10, full time.''
While this isn't much, it would be a step in the right direction. The fact that a league as popular as the NFL doesn't have full-time officials is a joke, especially when you consider how many bad calls are made. Of course, bad calls won't disappear even if the league does hire some full-time officials, but hopefully the move would at the very least provide more accountability.
(Side note: Goodell made the above comments at a fan forum in Baltimore on Sunday. Earlier in the season at a fan forum in Detroit, he claimed that officials get 99 percent of the calls correct. The fact that hiring full-time officials is now under consideration indicates to me that the 99 percent number was either fake or misleading, because I doubt the league would be in need of a change like this if that was an accurate statement.)
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
They lie out their teeth, and when you catch them, they lie to you some more.
theyre going to “think” about getting full time officials…
"To achieve victory, we must mass our forces at the hub of all power and movement, the enemies center of gravity." -Carl von Clausewitz
Not trying to be negative but I am not sure what this will accomplish.
If making this a full time, highly paid position encourages younger, and hopefully more committed, people to become referees, then fine. But in the short term we are stuck with the same incompetence for another five years or so.
And 99% is not tremendously impressive when you consider how many refereeing decisions are made every play of the game. Football is a game where action away from the ball is just as crucial as what is happening with the ball. Based on how many terrible calls get made or not made around the ball, I shudder to think how poorly the off ball stuff is being called.
"I’m sorry for all the people who want us to run the ball 40 times a game, but we’re going to put the ball in No. 9’s hands and he’s going to make plays for us like he did today," Lions coach Jim Schwartz said. Amen to that Jim!
i believe the object is to allow these officials to focus on improving the product
instead of it perhaps taking a backseat to their other jobs. it should work EXCEPT that 10 is absolutely an insanely low number. they should do 2-3 full time PER GAME, minimum.
Well, each play you have half a dozen holding call possibilities, about as many pass interference/d holding possibles
an illegal formation, offside, roughing/chop blocks/clippings.
So, there’s about 20 possible calls per play. According to Goodell, they screw up every 5th play. Sounds about right.
If all sports fandom is a form of emotional gambling, football is poker and hockey is Russian roulette.
Goodell has to go
hes the worst thing to happen to this league. hes ruining this game by pushing for these rule changes that are overly complicated and unclear, and subject to interpretation. you want consistency, CLARIFY THE RULES! and why the hell cant they get AT LEAST 1 full time official per game? yeah, THAT’LL improve the consistency!
by haywood on Jan 16, 2012 7:41 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
AMEN!!!
He’s a typical rich, white, lying American male (I am white btw) with no testicular fortitude. Just a total douchebag who needs to be canned.
changes
Ok,why the hell is a coach limited on how many challenges they have? The NFL says too many challenges slow down the game…. Well how about replaying 8 plays a game….and even when that happens they still get it wrong. I think a coach should be able to challenge a call that’s wrong….why should a coach be limited to only challenge 2 times a game….. How about 2 per half or 4 for the game! Who picked 2? If a coach thinks a call has been made wrong,then he should be able to question it more than twice in a game! And a borderline touchdown should be replaced no matter what….a play in the endzone I mean….. Titus had a td that was called no td…..replay “assistant” should’ve replayed that call….whether the ref said out or not…..it was a blatantly bad call. If the NFL is gonna make changes regarding the refs,how about making sure they get calls right,cause they are not making 99% of their calls right….I’d say maybe 80% at best.
by hostage42 on Jan 16, 2012 9:18 AM EST via mobile reply actions
It's about damn time they do something about this.
I’m on board with what Brian Billick was talking about in one of our last games with incorporating replay/review into everything. If the telecasts can show the replay one second after a play happens and see it from five angles, why can’t officials in a booth? I can’t for one second think that there should be, under NO circumstances be instances in the rule book that call for anything that is wrong, not to be correct. This bullshit about “non-reviewable calls” has got to go. I don’t care if Joe Blow Official got whistle-happy or not. If it’s a fumble, dammit… it’s a fumble.
While I like the idea of full-time officials, I think the flaw is inherently in the system. Wholesale changes to the way games are officiated are needed to get the game up to the digital era. If NBC can “NBSee” it and show that a mistake is made to the millions watching, then it is now the time to get this shit right. I refuse to listen to those that think this would slow the game down or take away the human error portion that’s been in the game since the beginning. The goal should never be to let a game be decided by an official’s mistake, but only by the play on the field.
I also think that penalties should be reviewed. We may be hard-pressed to ever see that, but a hold should be a hold, pass interference should be pass interference, etc. The replay booth should be able to quickly convene on a 58 yd pass interference play and say… “yeah, he got that call right” or “this one needs to be looked at for a second”. The technology is there, but the NFL refuses to move forward. IMHO, the stakes are just too high. With only 16 regular season games, one loss because of a bad call can be the difference between home field advantage throughout and being a wildcard team and having to play every game on the road. It’s the difference between a playoff game and sitting home on wildcard weekend. It’s people’s livelihoods and families. If a mistake is made because of gameplay, different. Again, officiating should never dictate the outcome of the game, only assess penalties that ACTUALLY occur and guide the game so that the calls on the field are correct… that’s it. That should be the goal… making sure that what happens on the field is called correctly.
one loss because of a bad call can be the difference between home field advantage throughout and being a wildcard team and having to play every game on the road
Or my favorite example, Chicago winning the division last year vs. being out completely solely because of the Calvin Johnson rule.
Fan of the Detroit Tigers, Lions and Red Wings.
That would make every game 6 hours long.
What's so funny 2011 Lions? Gordon Bombay doesn't think losing is funny.
Leshoure = 2012 Beastmode
Draft Konz!!
Hey.....
thanks for coming along and being “that guy”. You really think that while the next play is being set – while we are all ALREADY watching the replay for the 10th time on live television – that the replay officials in the booth can’t make a quick decision on whether or not the play needs to be looked at closer? C’mon… if there are that many wrong calls on the field, we have more problems than long games.
Seldom am I the voice of reason
and this may sound paranoid, but if anyone thinks for one second that the way games are called is gonna change they are living in a dream world. Any league that REQUIRES an injury report so that Vegas and the mob can set their point lines wants variability for the purpose of influence. It’s why coaches only get 2 challenges, it’s why there are “non-reviewable” calls and it’s why when one team fumbles the whistle gets blown and when another team fumbles the whistle stays in the pocket.
The only thing that can be done is to kick butt in all 3 phases and go to championship games with a good looking star quarterback to become media darlings and get on the side of the whistle that the Pack, Saints and Pats live on. I was rooting for the Pack against NY and the non fumble made my stomach turn, but I knew it was coming because we’ve seen it all year.
Not to mention TV ratings
the Vegas bit is a huge influence, but TV ratings stay high when teams like the Giants, Patriots, and Packers are playing. They’re also high in huge offensive games, which is why we’ve seen less and less offensive holding calls, which keeps quarterbacks from finding themselves on the turf.
You build on failure. You use it as a stepping stone. Close the door on the past. You don't try to forget the mistakes, but you don't dwell on it. You don't let it have any of your energy, or any of your time, or any of your space.
-Johnny Cash
by TheLoneDavid on Jan 16, 2012 10:51 AM EST up reply actions
Sorta paranoid, but....
I’m sure that some of the handcuffing of the league is because of that side of things. Deep down, I want to believe that gambling has no effect on the outcome of NFL games. I want to think that blown calls are random and teams that seem to get preference only seem to get it because they are good or that we hate them and all that. But… dammit, it seems no so coincidental sometimes. That non-fumble made my stomach turn too, because it was so blatant.
I’ve watched enough Packer games to know that in those games, they got the long end of the stick almost every time. Calls that any one of us could have easily made by the views we had on our HD big-screen TVs are ignored by paid officials. Something stinks there and hopefully, the fans and commentators have talked about it enough this year – because it has been the WORST full year of officiating I can ever remember – to usher in some wholesale changes in the coming year and years.
Agree with you about the Packers getting almost every call their way this year.
All part of their magical season.
"I’m sorry for all the people who want us to run the ball 40 times a game, but we’re going to put the ball in No. 9’s hands and he’s going to make plays for us like he did today," Lions coach Jim Schwartz said. Amen to that Jim!
by NorthLeft12 on Jan 16, 2012 12:01 PM EST up reply actions
Deep down, I want to believe that gambling has no effect on the outcome of NFL games.
Me too man.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GROW THE F UP
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Some people mistake the way I talk for the way I am thinking."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just not reality. They have to be betting on the games.
How else do you explain such a travesty of officiating? Seriously, if it was not so bad, it would be funny.
I predict that less than ten years from now a story will come out where a former NFL official admits that there was betting going on.
Audit any Refs finances
Once they have say 3 or 4 questionable calls during the season.Even if they turn out legit, they’ll still have a hell of an incentive to get their calls correct.
We've become so dumb we don't know how dumb we've become. Source Obscure.
Don't sweat the petty stuff & don't pet the sweaty stuff.
by Lionz Fowlweatherfan on Jan 16, 2012 4:21 PM EST up reply actions
Seems strange how close the odds are to the final outcome of games
I really don’t think no ones that good at setting them. its amazing how many pushes their are in a season.
We came! We saw! We lost to the Saints
The 2012 Lions will conquer
by Wayne Fontes on Jan 16, 2012 4:41 PM EST up reply actions
Doesn't matter seems if one guy from the crew has a vendetta against Detroit
He will call BS or not call obvious penalties on the other team I’ve seen it to often where the same douche ref screws us the entire game who’s to sa yit will change if that guy becomes a full-time douche.
We came! We saw! We lost to the Saints
The 2012 Lions will conquer




























